M6785426I5422_QA.pdf
PDF 56 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M6785426I5422
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for Request for Information (RFI) M67854-26-I-5422 concerning an Electronic Limited Technical Inspection (LTI) and System Integration Solution for the Marine Corps.
The document addresses three primary areas of inquiry regarding contract structure, personnel requirements, and security compliance. Regarding contract structure, the Government has not yet determined whether the requirement will be awarded as a single contract or structured with separable hardware and software components under distinct awards or prime/subcontractor arrangements; the RFI is intended to inform this decision. For personnel and access constraints, all contractor and subcontractor personnel requiring physical base access or logical access to DMLSS, MAVEN, and the Marine Corps Enterprise Network must be U.S. citizens, possess a favorable background investigation (minimum Tier 1/T1 for CAC issuance or Tier 3/T3 for Secret clearance if accessing sensitive data), and complete mandatory DoD cybersecurity training. While remote/off-site development is permissible at contractor facilities, physical integration testing, training, and deployment support will occur primarily on-site at Camp Lejeune, NC, with potential expansion to Camp Pendleton, CA, and Camp Kinser, Okinawa, Japan. Regarding Risk Management Framework and Authorization to Operate requirements, the Government is flexible regarding whether the solution operates under a standalone Authorization Boundary or as an integrated subsystem within existing DMLSS/MAVEN authorization boundaries. Regardless of the final boundary determination, the contractor will be responsible for developing, compiling, and maintaining all required Risk Management Framework artifacts per DoDI 8510.01 to achieve favorable Authority to Operate approval from the Marine Corps Authorizing Official.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic LTI and System Integration Solution.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers
M67854-26-I-5422
Electronic Limited Technical Inspection (LTI) and System Integration Solution
1. The requirement describes both the provision of COTS/GOTS handheld data capture devices and the development of bidirectional interfaces with DMLSS and MAVEN.
Does the Government anticipate these being awarded under a single contract, or is it open to a structure in which the hardware and the software integration are separable, either as distinct awards or as a prime/subcontractor arrangement?
a. Answer: The determination regarding a single vs multiple award has not been made at this time. The intent of this Request for Information is to gather enough information to make this determination.
2. What constraints does the Government anticipate with respect to personnel citizenship, place of performance, and physical or logical access to DMLSS and MAVEN environments, both for prime contractor personnel and for subcontractor personnel supporting the software integration?
a. Answer: All contractor and subcontractor personnel requiring physical base access or logical access to DMLSS, MAVEN, and the Marine Corps Enterprise Network (MCEN) must be U.S. citizens, possess a favorable background investigation (minimum Tier 1/T1 for CAC issuance, or Tier 3/T3 for Secret clearance if accessing sensitive data), and complete all mandatory DoD cybersecurity training. Remote/off-site development is permissible at contractor facilities; however, physical integration testing, training, and deployment support will primarily take place on-site at Camp Lejeune, NC, with potential expansion to Camp Pendleton, CA, and Camp Kinser, Okinawa, Japan.
3. Regarding the RMF/ATO requirement: does the Government expect the vendor to pursue a standalone ATO for the solution, or would the solution be expected to operate under an existing DMLSS or MAVEN authorization boundary?
a. Answer: The Government is open to a solution that operates either under its own standalone Authorization Boundary (ATO) or as an integrated sub-system within an existing DMLSS/MAVEN authorization boundary. Regardless of the final boundary determination, the Contractor will be responsible for developing, compiling, and maintaining all required Risk Management
Framework (RMF) artifacts (per DoDI 8510.01) required to achieve a favorable Authority to Operate (ATO) from the Marine Corps Authorizing Official (AO).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .