Attachment 5-Question and Answer Responses.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Joint Program Support Office Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M6785422R7204
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITIATION
| ATTACHMENT # 5 | |
| M67854-22-R-7204 Joint Intermediate Force Capability Office |
Joint Program Support Officers (JPSOs)
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
| Question # | RFQ Reference | Question / Comment | Government Response | RFP Change Required (Y/N) | Location of Change |
| 1 | RFP page 39 Contract Information | The proposed NAICS code of 541611 is defined as Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services and most of the PWS refers extensively to RDT&E efforts such as studies, analysis, and research tasks. Additionally, all of the of the past support for this work has been through other NAICS codes to include 541715 (RDT&E) as the predominate code. Why did the government select 541611 when NAICS 541715 would be more appropriate code for this proposed effort per historical small business awards? | The services being solicited are not participating in the RDT&E therefore this is not RDT&E. Familiarity with the Research will help in the business management of the services but this is absolutely not and RDT&E contract. | N | |
| 2 | As one of the incumbents on the current JIFCO PSO contract, our employees were questioned by an outside entity that the government hired to help develop the JIFCO strategy going forward. Due to this support in establishing recommendations for future operations and informing the governments RFP development for JIFCO, it would appear that this company would have an OCI based on an unfair competitive advantage based on their overly intimate knowledge of the requirements. Is this consistent with the government’s view? | There is no OCI issue. No Contractor has been involved in the development of the Government's requirement. | N | ||
| 3 | RFP page 48 Subfactor 3-KEY PERSONNEL | Since it would appear that each PSO is the Key Person for their respective services JIFCO support, please provide the reasoning why they are not deemed Key to the execution of this contract, in comparison to the PM, who is critical for contract management, but not for daily professional support at each Service location. | All key personnel will be designated at the Task Order level, not at the contract level. Refer to PWS 1.16.2.1, currently only the PM is designated as Key Personnel. The PM manages performance of Task Order/PWS requirements/quality. Non-key personnel provide on site support to meet PWS tasks for the resepctive Service. | N | |
| 4 | RFP Page 49, Factor 2 - Past Performance, B. PPQs | For contract examples that are assessed using the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) can an offeror provide copies of those assessment records in lieu of soliciting feedback via the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)? | No, for any reference that is listed in the Performance Information Retrieval System(PPIRS), which you are calling CPARS, the Government has ability to pull that reference. The PPQ is used for a reference you believe is relevant that may not be listed in PPIRS. | N | |
| 5 | RFP page 25 vs. page 39. | Page 25/78 in the RFP states the Base Year Period of Performance is 9/1/22-1/31/23. That timeframe equals 5 months. However, page 39/78 states "USMC intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price (FFP) IDIQ of 54 months (6-month base period and 4 one-year options)." Would the Government please clarify if the Base Period is 5 or 6 months, and if this clarification requires a change to the Period of Performance dates listed in the RFP? | The period of performance will be determined by the date of the award. The base will end 31 January 2023. The RFP will be updated to reflect the correct PoP. | Y | |
| 6 | RFP | What level of proposal detail is required to be submitted by subcontractors? Does the Government wish to receive both a Cost Narrative and Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook from subcontractors? OR, does the Government just want to receive one Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook and Cost Narrative from the Prime for the offering team (Prime and Subcontractors)? | Your first question is vague and not really clear as to what you are asking. This is a performance based requirement. The level of detail is the Prime Contractor’s responsibility. The price should provide a cost narrative along with the Pricing workbook. If there are any subcontractors they should provide the information directly to the Contracting Officer, but their pricing should be included in what is being submitted by the Prime. The offeror bears the responsibility of ensuring that they do not omit crucial aspects of their proposal, including subcontracting, if subcontracting is used. | N | |
| 7 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | Should Offerors create a column in the "SUMMARY Labor" tab to accurately list labor categories proposed by either the Prime or a subcontractor? Or, does the Government wish to receive one set of labor category rates proposed by the Team? | The prime should submit one set of labor categories rates proposed by the Team. | N | |
| 8 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | Are offerors to assume that applicable indirect rates, such as material handling and/or G&A, are included in the Travel and ODC costs provided by the Government? Or, should Offerors apply their applicable indirect rates to the Government provided Travel and ODC costs. | This is a firm fixed price contract. Travel and ODC should not be included because both at actual cost. Travel and ODC will be separately priced and will have a CLIN for travel and ODCs. | N | |
| 9 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | Please describe what the Government want Offerors to list in the "Summary Labor" workbook tab, Column A, titled "Ref". | The pricing workbook will be updated to remove Colum A | Y | |
| 10 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | Please describe what the Government want Offerors to list in the ""Base" and "Option Year" workbook tabs, Column E, titled "QTY". | List the quantity or number of hours to cover the number of FTE for a full many year based on the number of FTE's required to complete the task of each CLIN. | N | |
| 11 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | Please describe what the Government want Offerors to list in the ""Base" and "Option Year" workbook tabs, Column G, titled "UNIT PRICE". | The unit price. | N | |
| 12 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | In the ""Base" and "Option Year" workbook tabs, please describe the difference between the "UNIT PRICE" and "TOTAL PRICE" Columns and what the Government wants to see in each Column. | The unit price is what the Government can expect to pay on a monthly bases. The Total cost is the unit price times 12 months. The columns should clearly show how much | N | |
| 13 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | Does the Government wish for Offerors to escalate labor rates in the 6 month extension period? Please clarify if this is allowed or wanted, as this is often discouraged in RFPs. | The rates are not to be escalated for the 6 month extension period. They should be the same rates as the 4th option period if the contract is to be extended IAW FAR 52.217-8 | N | |
| 14 | RFP | Does the Government wish to dictate what amount of hours constitutes a Full-Time Equivalent (FTE)? E.g. 1920, 1902, 1880, etc. Or, should each Offeror propose what they deem appropriate for FTE hours per year? | No. Each Offeror should propose the number of hours for what they deem appropriate as a full man year for an FTE. | N | |
| 151 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | Is it the Government's intention to award $33,333.33 in Travel costs in the 6-month Base Period? Please clarify, as this is the same total Travel amount Offerors are to propose in each of the 12-month Option Years. | The travel is not guaranteed and the contractor will not be paid for travel not completed. The amount listed is a plug number for all Offerors to propose the same for Travel. It is a NTE amount; use the locations for the PSOs to determine a rough estimate of what travel might be. | N | |
| 16 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | Does the government want the Prime Contractor to include their "Material and Subcontractors" (M&S) Pass through rate cost separately in the Pricing workbook? Or does the Government want the M&S rate applied to the subcontractors rate to maintain the cost in a fully burden hourly rate format? | This is a contractor decision in regards to allocation of this cost. As long as it is allowable by law the contractor may use its preferred accounting method for pass through and G&A costs | N | |
| 17 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | May Offerors manipulate the spreadsheet to add columns and rows to best propose our labor? | No. | N | |
| 18 | Attachment 1 Pricing Workbook | In the "SUMMARY Labor" workbook tab, row 30, the Government included the following statement - "*Labor Categories may be broken down by CLIN as applicable, if for entire contract, leave blank." | This is not a question. | N | |
| 19 | RFP page 48 and 53/54 | In the Subfactor 3- KEY PERSONNEL instructions (pg. 48) it states "shall include resumes for key personnel". However, on pages 53/54 under FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED Subfactor 3 KEY PERSONNEL it states "shall include the narrative of experience and qualifications via a position description for key personnel roles, not by providing individually identified resumes of current Contractor employees." Can the government clarify if resumes are required? | Resumes for individuals are NOT allowed. Position descriptions or sample resumes for a personnel member who may fill the position may be submitted. Key personnel are not individuals but billets to be filled at the contractor's discretion by individuals/multiple persons (including the possibility of personnel changes throughout the tenure of the contract). | Y | |
| 20 | PWS pg. 9-11 Table 1 | Q: What is considered PSO overall related SME experience? | Cumulative among required and preferred qualifications and experience. SME experience can be wide ranging, as long as it is comparable to the JPSO PWS requirements and qualifications. | N | |
| 21 | PWS pg. 9-11 Table 1 | Q: What is considered Background in Force Protection Experience? | Reference DoD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms and DOD Instruction O-2000.16, Volume 2 DoD Antiterrorism (AT) program Implementation: DoD Force Protection Condition(FCON) System | N | |
| 22 | PWS pg. 15 paras 3.1-3.3 | Q: Will access devices (e.g. MOBI keys) be provided to permit NIPR access for a PSO to work from home if required? | No. Refer to PWS Part 3. | N | |
| 23 | PWS pg. 15 paras 3.1-3.3 | Q: What are the conditions (if any) and requirements for a PSO to work from home? | Refere to PWS paragraph 1.7 On-site working Conditions, Holidays, and other Closures. | N | |
| 24 | PWS pg. 17, para 4.2h | Q: Where are the NLW warfighter and industry Conferences/Symposiums held? | Unknown - TBD. Task 4.2b deliverable facilitates annual planning for Government and PSOs. | N | |
| 25 | General | Q: Is there an incumbent? Q: If so, please provide the incumbent's name and contract number? | Yes. SURVICE Engineering Company LLC GS00Q14OADS437, and Technology Management Group Inc sub SciTech Services W911SR-19-D-006 | N | |
| 26 | RFP pg. 45 of 78 paras 1.6.1 (Indexing and Organization) and 1.6.2 (Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms) | Q: Are the table of contents and glossaries used in each volume exempt from the page count limitations? | No, the page count includes all material except that listed as exempted. | N | |
| 27 | RFP pg. 46 of 78 para 2 Volume I Contract Documentation | Reference validation of personnel with a minimum of a Secret clearance. Q: Is the Government asking for clearance validation for just Key Personnel or all personnel? Q: If so, what documentation do you require? | All personnel. Contractor shall attest to fully adjuidcated clearances within TAB 3 Go-no go factors 3 page limit. Do not submit personal identifiable information. A visit request via DISS will be required prior to contract performance start for official validation. | N | |
| 28 | RFP pg. 47 of 78 Sub-factor 2: Staffing Plan, last paragraph of page. | The Staffing Plan guidance states "Do not include resumes in any volume." However pg. 48 Subfactor 3 - KEY PERSONNEL states resumes are required for key personnel. Q: Are resumes to be provided for Key Personnel? Q: If resumes are to be included in Factor 1 Sub Factor 3 KEY PERSONNEL, are the resumes exempt from the Technical page count? | No, the page count includes all material except that listed as exempted. Also, see answer to #20 above. The contractor should not include specific person's resumes but should include position descriptions/sample resumes. | Y | |
| 29 | RFP pg. 48 of 78 Factor 2 - Past Performance para A and B. Pg. 54 of 78 para 3.1.3 and 3.1.3.1. | Pg. 48, Para A states past performances must be within the past 5 years. Para B states past performances performed in the past three years, offerors should provide a PPQ. Page 54 paras 3.1.3 and 3.1.3.1 state only past performances within the past three years will be evaluated. Q: Are all past performances to have been performed in the past five or three years? | Yes | N | |
| 30 | RFP pg. 48 of 78 Factor 2 - Past Performance para B. | The second paragraph of B states PPQs are to be submitted "by the deadline below." However, there is no deadline. Q: What is the deadline for PPQs to be submitted? | This section of the RFP will be updated to provide the deadline for all PPQ's. The deadline is the same date as the due date of the RFP. | Y | |
| 31 | RFP pg. 49 Factor 2 Past Performance, para B, 3rd subparagraph | This paragraph states the Contractor's POCs are to submit completed PPQs to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer. Q: Is the "Contractor's POC" the Offeror's client Contractor's POC? If so, the organization table on pg. 43 shows offerors are to submit completed PPQs in Section 3 of Tab B Factor 2 Past Performance. Government KO/COR usually will only submit PPQs to the proposal Contracting Office, not to the contractor. Q: Are offerors directed to obtain completed PPQs from our Government clients and include them in Tab B Factor 2 Section 3 and direct our clients to also submit PPQs the proposal Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer? | (1) The Contractor's POC is the Government COR or person that can speak to your reference; (2) No, the Government POC is the person that should submit the PPQ to the Contracting Officer and Specialist. | Y | |
| 32 | RFP pg. 50 of 78 para 5. Volume IV - Contract Proposal Item. | Q: Will the Government provide more details of what is to be provided in Volume IV? | See the Chart on page 43. This is the completion of the IDIQ solicitation material. The paragraph is to specify that any and all attachments should be included. | N | |
| 33 | RFP Contract Terms and Conditions Required pg. 61 of 78 | The Government has selected 52.222-41 and 52.222-44 related to Service Contract Labor Standards. However the qualifications in Table 1 and Specific Tasks in Part 4 appear to be professional positions. Q: Are all positions including the PM and APM to be Service Contract Labor Standard labor categories/pricing? | FAR Clause 52.222.41 and 44 will be removed because they are not applicable for this action. | Y | |
| 34 | RFP page 61 of 78, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires | The Government has selected 52.222-42. Q: Will the Government provide the Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires? | FAR Clause 52.222.42 will be removed because it is not applicable for this action. | Y | |
| 35 | ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS 1.1.2. (page X); ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (page 52) | You state you may eliminate submissions to reduce those being evaluated to a reasonable competitive size. If there are more responses than you find reasonable, what criteria will you use to select responses to eliminate? | Refer to Section 1.1.2 Competitive Rage Determination. Should the Government determines there is a need to establish a competitive range, the Contracting Officer will select the proposals that have the best chance of providing the best value to the Government to remain in competition for award. | N | |
| 36 | ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS 1.1.2. (page X); ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (page 52) | If a company has not recent past performance will they be eliminated before their technical approach is read if the competitive field is too large for a reasonable competitive size? | No. | N | |
| 37 | ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS 1.1.2. | Will introduction or inclusion of state-of-art commercial technical approaches to information management that does not currently have Authority to Operate on government systems but be used by the contractor in FEDRMP Moderate cloud location be cause for elimination from competition? | No | N | |
| 38 | ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS 1.1.2. (page X); ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (page 52) | If there are more responses than you find reasonable, what criteria will you use to select responses to eliminate? | The Government will use the criteria within the RFP to determine which proposal presents the best value to the Government. | N | |
| 39 | ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS 5. Volume IV -- Contract Proposal Items (page 51). | Do you anticipate awarding the IDIQ Model Contract? | The section on Volume IV has been removed. | N | |
| 40 | ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS 5. Volume IV -- Contract Proposal Items 3.1.3.3 (page 55). | Will a 20 year history of satisfactory performance across a broad spectrum of related DoD service be sufficient to raise the performance confident assessment to "Satisfactory Confidence" if the offeror has no recent relevant experience? | This question is not appropriate at this time. All past performance references will be evaluate when submitted. | N | |
| 41 | PWS, Section 1.16.1, Non-Key Personnel | Who/where is the Material Developer? | Material Developer is not referenced, nor a qualification or experience requirement. | N | |
| 42 | PWS, Section 1.16.1, Non-Key Personnel | Who/where is the Training Developer? | Training Developer is not referenced, nor a qualification or experience requirement. | N | |
| 43 | ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS, 3. Volume II Technical Proposal, Factor 1- Technical Approach, Sub-Factor 2: Staffing Plan | Can the Government provide historical or estimated staffing requirements with Labor Categories and FTE? | No, this is a performance based acquisition. All Offerors should propose their best response. | N | |
| 44 | ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS, 3. Volume II Technical Proposal, Factor 1- Technical Approach, Sub-Factor 2: Staffing Plan | (2) 52.222-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires (MAY 2014) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. chapter 67) is marked as a included clause but we could not find any equivalent rates provided. Can the Government please provide those? | Refer to the response for questions 33 and 34 above. | N | |
| 45 | General | Who is the incumbent contractor providing this support? What contract numbers are being used for the current support? | SURVICE Engineering Company LLC GS00Q14OADS437, and Technology Management Group Inc sub SciTech Services W911SR-19-D-006 | N | |
| 46 | RFP, Page 43, Vol 4 | Vol 4 Contract Proposal Items - the government does not specify what should go into this volume other than IDIQ model contract, which was not provided? Is this volume required, if so, please provide details on what needs to be provided in this volume and how it will be evaluated – given there is no evaluation criteria for this volume. | RFP changed to fix the confusion on the matter; moved to new location and expanded upon. Vol IV has been removed to clear up confusion. | Y | |
| 47 | RFP, Page 46, Go/No Go | Given the government's requirement for a valid current facility security clearance and individual clearances, will the government provide the DD-254 for this contract? It is typical for DD-254's to be released with the RFP. | Yes, the Government will provide the Draft DD-254 with the amendment to the RFP. | N | |
| 48 | RFP, Page 46, Go/No Go | Go/No Go Factors: |
1. Offeror shall have a Top Secret Facility Clearance
2. Offeror personnel shall have a Secret Clearance
Offerors shall submit documentation to show they have a valid current Top Secret facility clearance and their personnel have, at minimum, a valid current Secret clearance.
| What documentation is required for demonstrating a company has a current TS facility clearance? What documentation is required for demonstrating personnel have a Secret clearance? | 1. Contractor shall attest to fully adjuidcated clearances within TAB 3 Go-no go factors 3 page limit. Do not submit personal identifiable information. | ||||
| 2. Contractor shall attest to the a Top Secret Facility Clearance within TAB 3 Go-no go factors 3 page limit. Government will use CAGE code to validate facility clearance status. | N | ||||
| 49 | RFP, Page 46, Go/No Go | Given the role of the PM, and the fact that he/she will predominately work from contractor facilities, is there a requirement for remote or contractor site storage of classified materials? Will the government include this in the contract in order to ensure offeror can obtain classified storage privileges? | No. No. Refer to DD 254. | N | |
| 50 | Vol 1 Price workbook | The government put 9,999 quantity / units both in the workbook and the RFP. Is that the correct number of units or are we allowed to change the number of units? | The 9,999 is for the IDIQ Contract. The quantity for the Task Order will be different. This is used to ensure we can award the appropriate number of Task Orders over the life of the contract within our Contract writing system. The Task Order quantity should be based on a monthly bill rate for the number of FTEs each Offeror deems is necessary to perform the work. | N | |
| 51 | Vol 1 Price workbook | On tab 1 the government put in TO vs Option Years. Are those columns Task Orders or Options Years? | Option years | N | |
| 52 | Vol 1 Price workbook | On the following Tabs (Base and OYs), the government has requested pricing to be broken down by specific work areas (CLINs). Given the nature of the work will change over time and what that might be is unknown by industry or by the government clients and since this FFP, would it be more appropriate to build these costs based on the number of FTEs required vs CLIN work areas? | The CLINS cost should be based on the number of FTEs required to perform the work for each CLIN. | N | |
| 53 | PWS, Page 4 and 9 | The PWS has conflicting information related to security clearances. On Page 4 it states "1.11 Security Requirements. This contract shall require at least one contract person to have to have a fully adjudicated Top Secret security clearance and the remaining personnel performing on the contract shall have a fully adjudicated Secret security clearance." Then on page 9 it states "1.16.1 Non-Key Personnel Must be eligible for SECRET clearance." Please confirm that the requirement is TS and that one of the non-key personnel will require a TS clearance. | Refer to PWS Table 1. Non-Key Personnel Non-Key Personnel for SOCOM. | N | |
| 54 | PWS 1.16.2 | Will the government confirm the only Key Personnel is the PM? If so, please state the requirements for the PM? | Refer to PWS paragraph 1.16.2.1. Currently only the PM is designated as Key Personnel. The PM manages performance of Task Order/PWS requirements/quality. Non-key personnel provide on site support to meet PWS tasks for the resepctive Service. | N | |
| 55 | PWS 1.16.1 | What is the historical LCAT breakout of the Non Key positions in support of PWS para 4.1-4.5? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 56 | PWS 1.16.1 | Please provide additional information ref the LCAT "non key personnel Additional JPSO as requested"? Is this a surge LCAT? Is this LCAT anticipated to support a specific JPSO position, i.e. Army, Navy, USMC, USCG, SOCOM? What is the historical level of effort for the Additional JPSO as requested LCAT? | Refer to PWS paragraph 1.9. | ||
| There have never been additional JPSO positions; therefore no history. | N | ||||
| 57 | PWS 1.16.1 | What is the historical level of effort for the non key USA PSO LCAT? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 58 | PWS 1.16.1 | What is the historical level of effort for the Non-key Personnel USMC PSO LCAT? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 59 | PWS 1.16.1 | What is the historical level of effort for the Non-key Personnel USCG PSO LCAT? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 60 | PWS 1.16.1 | What is the historical level of effort for the Non-key Personnel USAF PSO LCAT? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 61 | PWS 1.16.1 | What is the historical level of effort for the Non-key Personnel USAF Acquisition PSO LCAT? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 62 | PWS 1.16.1 | What is the historical level of effort for the Non-key Personnel USN PSO LCAT? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 63 | PWS 1.16.1 | What is the historical level of effort for the Non-key Personnel USN Requirements PSO LCAT? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 64 | PWS 1.8 | What is the historical level of effort for the USA PSO LCAT at located at Ft. Eustis, VA? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 65 | PWS 1.8 | What is the historical level of effort for the USN PSO LCAT at located at Norfolk VA? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 66 | PWS 1.8 | What is the historical level of effort for the USN Requirements PSO LCAT located at Norfolk VA? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 67 | PWS 1.8 | What is the historical level of effort for the USMC PSO LCAT located at MCB Quantico VA? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 68 | PWS 1.8 | What is the historical level of effort for the USAF PSO LCAT located at Lackland AFB, TX? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 69 | PWS 1.8 | What is the historical level of effort for the USAF Acquisitions PSO LCAT located at Lackland AFB, TX? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 70 | PWS 1.8 | What is the historical level of effort for the SOCOM PSO LCAT located at MacDill AFB, Tampa FL? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 71 | PWS 1.8 | What is the historical level of effort for the USCG PSO LCAT located at Anacostia, MD? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 72 | PWS 1.9 | para 1.9 states "There may be requirements for JPSO’s to work for other customer sites other than current Government/Contractor locations. Other contractor facilities shall be capable of internet access to use CAC-enabled websites, telephone availability, and use of official .mil e-mail addresses." Does contractor facilities need to be capable of use of official.mil email addresses prior to award? What is the historical use of contractor facilities? How many FTEs have worked from contractor facilities pre COVID and post COVID time period? | Refer to PWS 1.7, 1.7.1, and 1.8, Part 2, and Part 3. Internet connectivity is required at other than Government work sites. All PSO locations have on-site location requirements. There have never been any PSOs working exclusively from contractor facilities. | N | |
| 73 | PWS 1.8 | What is the anticipated level of effort for the JIFCO SIOD PSO LCAT at MCB Quantico VA? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 74 | PWS 1.8 | What is the anticipated level of effort for the USA PSO LCAT at Ft. Benning Ga? | This is a performance based acquisition. All Offeror should propose their best offer in response to the task within the PWS. | N | |
| 75 | Table 2. Key Deliverable Overview Table. | As little detail is provided in daily/weekly support and deliverables, "What is the historical level of effort for the non key USA PSO LCAT?" Short of this information, the current incumbent has a significant advantage in developing a staffing plan and fair and reasonable price. | PSO and locations to achieve performance requirements are listed in PWS Table 1. | N | |
| 76 | Who are the current Primes providing similar or identical task support? What are their respective contract numbers? | SURVICE Engineering Company LLC GS00Q14OADS437, and Technology Management Group Inc sub SciTech Services W911SR-19-D-006 | N | ||
| 77 | pg 39 Contract Info and pg 25 states Base Period is 1SEP22-31JAN23 | It appears the PoP stating 54 months is actually 53 months (5 month base period and 4 one-year options) | The RFP will be updated to indicate the PoP being dependent upon when the contract is awarded. The PoP will end 31 January 2023. | Y | |
| 78 | PWS page 1 | Martin Luther King Day is missing out--Should there be 11 Government holidays? | The PWS will be updated to add Martin Luther Kind Day | Y | |
| 79 | pg 68 and pg 36 | Page 68 states that the NAICS for this acquisition is 541611 with a size standard of $16.5M; however pg 36 states it is 500 exmployees. Which size standard is correct? | This is the standard clause with only the relevant information filled in. The subsection in question about employees states " other than on a construction or service acquisition" and this is a service acquisition so it does not apply. | N |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .