RHGPK_SOW_Attachment 1_16 Dec 2020.pdf

Attachment 1, Statement of Work

Statement of Work for

Marine Corps Reducible Height Gunner Protection Kit

(RHGPK)

December 16, 2020

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D.DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO THE

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND DOD CONTRACTORS ONLY.

REASON: CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY.DATE OF DETERMINATION: 2006-07-25

OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE

U.S.ARMY TANK AUTOMOTIVE AND ARMAMENTS COMMAND, ATTN: SFAE-

CSS-MR-VS, WARREN, MI 48397-5000.

WARNING: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS TEHCNICAL DATA WHOSE

EXPORT IS RESTRICTED BY THE ARMS EXPORT CONTROL ACT

(TITLE 22, U.S.C., SEC. 275I ET. SEQ.) OR THE EXPORT

ADMINISTRATION ACT OF 1979, AS AMENDED (TITLE 50, U.S.C.

APP. 240I EE. SEQ.) VIOLATIONS OF THESE LAWS ARE SUBJECT

TO SEVERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES. DISSEMINATE IN ACCORDNCE

WITH PROVISIONS OF DOD DIRECTIVE 5230.25.

1 Summary

1.1 Scope. This Statement of Work (SOW) sets forth the requirements for the procurement, manufacturing, program management support, Configuration Management (CM), warranty repair, technical documentation, for the Reducible Height Gunner Protection Kit hereafter referred to as RHGPK. An RHGPK system includes all the mechanical and electromechanical vehicle integration components; hatch assembly, gear rings, turret drive motors, and controllers

(Integrated Turret Drive System (ITDS)). An RHGPK includes both opaque and transparent armor. The RHGPK system will be procured in three (3) separate kits: The RHGPK, the ITDS kit, and the Conversion kit.

1.2 Background. Marine Corps Systems Command Program Manager, Infantry Weapons (PM

IW) located at Quantico, VA, develops components and weapon systems to meet evolving requirements for tactical vehicles employing turret systems. Meeting these requirements often utilizes traditional and exotic materials, exceptional high tolerances, and precise features. Both traditional and non-traditional manufacturing methods have been used for fabricating production quantity hardware for military tactical vehicles.

2 Applicable Documents

Marine Corps Systems Command

DWG 19200 – 13102670 Reducible Height Objective Gunner Protection Kit

DWG 19200 – 13023999 Integrated Turret Drive System (ITDS) Kit

DWG 19200 – 13102671 Conversion Kit Turret, ITDS Ready (JLTV)

US Army Test and Evaluation Command

TOP 2-2-710 Test Procedure, Ballistic Tests of Armor Materials

ITOP 1-2-601 FR/GE/UK/US International Test Operations Procedure, Laboratory Vibration Schedules

TOP 1-2-501 Test Operations Procedure (TOP) 1-2-501 Rail Impact

Testing

US Army Tank and Automotive Command

ATPD 2352 rev R Armor Transparent Purchase Description

Federal, Military and DOD Approved Standards

SAE-AMS-595 Colors Used in Government Procurement

(Formerly FED-STD-595)

MIL-STD-810 H Environmental Engineering Considerations and Lab Tests

MIL-STD-1275 Characteristics Of 28 Volt DC Input Power to Utilization

Equipment in Military Vehicles

MIL-STD-1472 Human Engineering

MIL-STD-2073-1E Standard Practice for Military Packaging w/Change 1

MIL-DTL-53072 Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) System

Application Procedures and Quality Control Inspection

DOD-HDBK-743 Anthropometry of US Military Personnel

Environmental Protection Agency

EPA 550-B-15-001 Consolidated List of Chemicals Subject to the Emergency

Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the

Clean Air Act

Other Goverment Documents

US Army FM 3-11 Multiservice Tactics, Techniques and Procedures for

(USMC WP 3-37.1) Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defense Operations

US Army FM 3-11.5 Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear

(USMC WP 3-37.3) Decontamination

MIL-STD-130N (1) Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, 16 Nov

Availability of DOD Documents. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents may be viewed or downloaded from the ASSIST database at http://quicksearch.dla.mil/.

Non-Government Standards and Other Publications.

ASQ/ANSI/ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems– Requirements, 21 Oct 2015

ANSI/EIA-649-B Configuration Management Standard, Apr 2011

Availability of Non-Government Standards and Other Publications. Non-Government

Publications are available from the American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd

Street, 4th floor, New York, NY 10036, or at http://webstore.ansi.org/default.aspx.

Order of Precedence. In the event of a conflict between the text of this document and the references cited herein, the text of this document shall take precedence. Nothing in this document shall supersede applicable federal, state, or local laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

3 Requirements

The Contractor shall deliver RHGPK systems in accordance with (IAW) this SOW and the

RHGPK Technical Data Packages TDP accompanying the RFP referred herein as the

RHGPK TDP. The Contractor shall provide all material, services, and necessary support documentation needed to complete the tasks identified within this SOW.

Meetings, Formal Reviews, Conferences and Audits

3.2.1 Program Management. The Contractor shall be responsible for the manufacture of the

RHGPK and its overall performance. The Contractor shall establish a program management structure that ensures the overall quality of the RHGPK and compliance with delivery schedules.

The Contractor shall ensure that it adequately addresses all task requirements pertinent to contract performance. The Contractor shall define and maintain appropriate subcontract and associated contract relationships to support all contract requirements. The Contractor shall designate a point of contact responsible for substantive communication with the Government.

The Contractor shall provide monthly progress reports identifying the status of delivery orders, warranty repairs, Interim Contractor Logistics Support (ICLS), data deliverables, failure analysis and corrective actions, Engineering Change Proposals (ECP), requests for variance, programmatic issues, technical issues, significant meetings, upcoming events, and milestones.

The Contractor shall participate in monthly telephone conferences to review the monthly status and progress reports, with exact dates and times mutually agreed upon with the Government.

(CDRL A001, Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report)

3.2.2 Post-Award Conference (PAC)/Provisioning Guidance Conference (PGC). A Post-

Award Conference/Provisioning Guidance Conference shall be held at the Government’s facility within ten (10) calendar days after contract award. An exact date for the conference shall be mutually agreed upon after contract signing. The conference will specifically discuss all sections of the contract in detail with emphasis on programmatic points of interest, to include manufacturing readiness, quality management, and requirements compliance. At the PAC, the

Contractor shall furnish provisioning data and subsequently at mutually agreed upon intervals.

The Contractor shall prepare presentations and provide a copy to the Government within seven

(7) calendar days after the conclusion of the conference.

(CDRL A002, Presentation Materials)

3.2.3 Interim Reviews (IPR). IPRs shall be in accordance with Table 1-1. The Government reserves the right to cancel any review or to require any review to occur during the period of performance. Agenda items shall include the Contractor’s progress, management, technical support services (if any), administrative, assurance of compliance with contract requirements, program status, funding, and problem identification and resolutions. For each agenda item, the

Contractor shall detail actual performance in comparison to expected performance. The

Contractor shall prepare presentation materials overviewing all agenda items. The Contractor shall prepare presentations and provide a copy to the Government within seven (7) calendar days after the conclusion of the conference.

(CDRL A002, Presentation Materials)

3.2.4 Production Readiness Review (PRR). A Production Readiness Review (PRR) shall be held at the Contractor’s facility within 90 calendar days after contract award. An exact date shall be mutually agreed between the Contractor and the Government. The Contractor shall show that the system design includes the key production factors (e.g., minimum time, manufacturing simplicity/flexibility, resource availability) necessary to assure the system’s delivery is on schedule. The initial production readiness review shall take place at the Contractor's facility. The

Government may require, at its discretion, follow-on production program reviews at the

Contractor's facility. The PRR agenda shall include the following items:

A manufacturing program overview, to include the overall manufacturing system and detailed factors such as:

a. Manufacturing organization, responsibilities, facilities and equipment, manufacturing methods, and production flow.

b. A status review of all production efforts and concerns to minimize risk to the production schedule.

c. A status review of production engineering efforts, tooling and test equipment demonstrations, and proofing of new materials, processes, methods, special tooling and test equipment.

d. The status of long lead items for production, if applicable.

The Contractor shall prepare presentations and provide a copy to the Government within seven

(7) calendar days after the conclusion of the PRR.

(CDRL A002, Presentation Materials)

3.2.5 Physical Configuration Audit. The Contractor and the Government shall perform a baseline Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) to verify the RHGPK and its component parts are accurate, complete, and compatible. The PCA shall also verify that the particular component is in accordance with the specification. The Contractor shall consolidate the results of its audits on subcontractors for configuration management of the RHGPK. The Government and the

Contractor shall conduct the system-level PCA jointly, at the Contractor’s place of performance and the Government will chair the audit. The Contractor shall plan, organize, chair, and conduct audits on subcontractors, with the Government serving in a support capacity when necessary before submitting the baselined CIs. The PCA shall verify that the components reflect the "as-built" configuration of all newly developed or modified portions of the system; confirm that accurate form, fit, function information is provided on control patterns for all CIs; and confirm the components accurately represent the "as-built" production configuration. The Contractor shall participate and assist the Government in developing the PCA, using the guidelines contained in MIL-HDBK-61A, Section 8. The Contractor shall document the PCA results after each audit and correct all audit discrepancies documented in the configuration audit summary reports, which are data deliverables. In the event the Government finds any discrepancies, the

Government reserves the right to request revisions until the Contractor corrects all discrepancies and the Government approves the configuration audit summary report. The completion of the

PCA establishes the product baseline.

(CDRL A003, PCA Report)

3.2.6 Provisioning Conference. The Government will clarify any provisioning issues during the evolution of the data cleansing process. The Contractor shall identify provisioning and other pre-procurement screening data to be submitted for Government screening. Provisioning and other pre-procurement screening data are used to identify existing National Stock Numbers

(NSNs) for items, validate currency of an NSN, and aid in maximum use of known assets. The

Contractor shall provide Provisioning Technical Documentation as applicable for new, changed or updated parts. This Documentation shall include complete item nomenclature, prime manufacturer’s and contractor’s parts number, line drawing(s), estimated unit price, and unit of issue. The Provisioning Parts List (PPL) shall contain the end item, component or assembly and all support items which can be disassembled, reassembled, or replaced at the Field Level of

Maintenance, and which, when combined, constitute the end item, component or assembly and shall include items such as parts, materials, connecting cabling, and fittings required for the operation and maintenance of the end item, component, or assembly. The PPL is a tool used to determine the range of support items required to maintain the end item for an initial period of service. The PPL shall contain all repair kits and repair parts required to maintain the end item, component, or assembly equipment unless excluded by the provisioning requirements.

(CDRL A002, Presentation Materials)

(CDRL C001, Provisioning Parts List)

Table 1-1: Meetings, Formal Review, Conferences and Audits

Event Frequency Time Frame Location

Post-Award

Conference

(PAC)

Once Within ten (10) calendar days of contract award Government’s Facility

Interim Progress

Reviews (IPR) Quarterly

As required and 90 days prior to commencing production runs

Alternate between

Government and

Contractor Facility

Production

Readiness

Review (PRR)

Once Within 90 calendar days after contract award Contractor’s Facility

Physical

Configuration

Audit (PCA)

Once Ten (10) days before delivery of First

Article Test (FAT) articles Contractor’s Facility

Provisioning

Conference Once As required Government’s Facility

Systems Engineering

3.3.1 Manufacturing Capability. The Contractor shall fabricate, assemble, test, inspect, pack, and deliver the production quantity hardware and spare parts in accordance with the RFP and the

TDP accompanying the RFP. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing all equipment, tooling, and material required to produce the required hardware and spare parts. The Contractor shall be familiar with and possess the capability to build a system from a detailed Government

TDP, procure certified aluminum armor plate, procure an Integrated Turret Drive System (ITDS)

Kit, laser cutting and/or water jet cutting, metal removal processes, Computer Numerical Control

(CNC) machining, welding on ferrous materials including welding armor grade steel MIL-STD-

3040, forming/bending of mild steel, Rolled Homogeneous Armor (RHA) steel armor plate and aluminum plate, applying adhesives, Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC), MAGNI 565

Aluminum protective coating, and procure/manufacture transparent armor. The Contractor shall be capable of working with machining, welding, and assembling components comprised of armor grade metals and ballistic equivalent transparent armor materials. Armor Grade Metals are Rolled Homogeneous Armor (RHA) (MIL-A-12560), High-Hard Steels (MIL-DTL-46100 or

MIL-DTL-46177), and Aluminum 7085 (MIL-DTL-32375).

3.3.2 Tooling. The Contractor shall be able to fabricate tooling, modify tooling to achieve required tolerances, or modify tooling to fabricate revised designs. The Contractor shall be able to maintain and store tools for the duration, as a minimum, of the contract. The Contractor shall be able to determine the optimal parameters for tooling and equipment to fabricate hardware parts.

3.3.3 Certified Materials. The Contractor shall be able to procure certified materials.

3.3.4 Hardware Fabrication. The Contractor shall be able to fabricate hardware components, perform process development and manufacture of parts and assemblies, and assemble subsystems/systems containing said hardware components. Records of processing parameters for each run of parts shall be maintained for use in further production or for future analysis, and made available to the Government.

3.3.5 Inspection Reports. The Contractor shall be able to provide final documented inspection reports and material certifications for completed parts. All equipment/devices used to generate inspection reports shall be calibrated and certified. Inspections shall be performed at the

Contractors’ site.

Configuration Management

3.4.1 Technical Data Package (TDP). The configuration to be produced and delivered under this contract will be under the configuration management control of the Government buying activity. Any request for changes to the configuration shall be directed in writing by the

Contracting Officer. All designs supplied by the Government under this contract or derived from these designs shall remain confidential between the Government, the Contractor, and its subcontractors, unless approval from the Government for drawings supplied by the Government explicitly state otherwise.

3.4.2 Changes to the TDP. Any engineering change proposal (ECP) or value engineering change proposal requires Government approval. Changes to the TDP shall be approved by the

Government in advance. Prior to implementation, requests shall contain sufficient rationale, test data, engineering analysis, etc., as to why the change is necessary and if performance is affected.

If there is a change in cost as a result of any configuration change, an all-inclusive cost summary to implement must accompany the engineering change documentation. Any configuration change requests shall be submitted as an Engineering Change Proposal or as a Notice of Revision

(NOR).

(CDRL B001, ECP)

(CDRL B002, NOR)

3.4.3 Request for Variance (RFV) of Non-Conforming Materiel / End Item. The Government requires notification of:

a) Any non-conforming materiel to be used in the production of the delivered hardware, or

b) If the final product as delivered to the Government does not meet the requirements of the TDP, the Government has final acceptance/rejection authority on all non-conforming material used in the production of contract deliverables.

(CDRL B003, RFV)

3.4.4 Request for Variation. The Contractor shall submit RFVs to the Government as required.

If there is known non-conforming materiel that has not yet been used in the production of the deliverables or if the finished product is not in compliance with the TDP provided, the

Contractor shall submit a request in writing to the Contracting Officer in accordance with

(CDRL B003). Such requests shall contain sufficient rationale, test data, engineering analysis, etc., as to why the request is necessary and how performance is limited or not affected by the non-conformity.

(CDRL B003, RFV)

3.4.5 Quality Management System (QMS). The Contractor, and subcontractor(s) with production responsibility, shall maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) in accordance with ISO 9001 or equivalent system and the supplemental requirements contained herein. If the

Contractor desires to utilize an alternate quality management system, a request shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer for approval.

3.4.6 Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP). The Contractor shall maintain a documented

QAPP in accordance with the Contractors Quality Management System (QMS). The plan shall include the quality system compliance/certification status, and a description of the current or planned programs that will be in place for the production of the system, to include lot traceability and Vendor/subcontractor oversight. The plan shall include sections covering Inspection/Test

Plan (including, but not limited to: incoming inspections; in-process inspections and controls;

and final inspections), Critical Defect Program, Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Process Control Documentation, a system to address non-conforming materials and corrective actions in the event of a nonconformance, and rework. The Contractor shall submit the QAPP, for both the prime and subcontractor (s) in accordance with CDRL B004 for Government review and approval. An updated QAPP shall be submitted if there is any change for either the prime or subcontractor(s) and shall be subject to Government approval. The Contractor shall provide a review and update schedule for this plan in accordance with the QMS. This document shall be available for Government review.

(CDRL B004, QAPP)

3.4.7 Conformance Inspection and Test Methods. The Contractor shall be responsible for delivering hardware that meets all the requirements of the Applicable Documents in Paragraph

3.3.1 unless otherwise specified in the contract. The Contractor shall establish inspection and test methods and procedures necessary to assure compliance with all of the requirements contained herein. Each requirement shall be carefully analyzed and a determination made as to the methods, procedures, equipment and sequence of inspection and tests, which will best ensure the acceptance of those components and products which meet the specified requirements and reject those that do not.

3.4.8 Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE)/ Special Inspection Equipment.

The Contractor shall furnish detailed descriptions (i.e., part numbers, manufacturer, model, calibration records, and accuracy) of all acceptance and inspection equipment used for inspections and tests of all critical, major, and special QAP characteristics. Contractor AIE utilized for the inspections of characteristics identified as minor is not required as part of the submission; however, if the Contractor desires its review and evaluation, the submission shall include the appropriate information specified herein. Equipment shall have an accuracy of 10% of the total tolerance zone of the dimension being inspected and will refer to MIL-W-63150, MILITARY SPECIFICATION: WEAPONS AND SUPPORT MATERIEL STANDARD

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS FOR, Paragraph 3.8.1. Test and Inspection equipment designs used to verify compliance with the requirements for inspections and tests shall be submitted by the Contractor to the Government for approval in accordance with CDRL B005.

The Government reserves the right to disapprove, at any time during the performance of this contract, the use of any AIE not meeting the requirements of the approved documentation.

(CDRL B005, AIE)

3.4.9 Acceptance Inspection/Test Documentation. The Contractor’s quality program or detailed inspection system shall provide and retain for the duration of the contract documented and validated evidence of compliance with all specified requirements in accordance with the applicable requirements specified in the contract. The Contractor shall document the results of any receiving, in-process and final inspection(s)/test(s) performed on components, subassemblies, the final assembly, and any items delivered as spares. As part of inspection and test, the Government reserves the right to conduct a configuration audit when it deems it necessary to verify parts and assemblies are in accordance with the TDP and this SOW.

(CDRL B006, Test/Inspection Report)

First Article Test. The Contractor shall notify the government 15 days prior to initiating the FAT of the time and location of the testing so that the Government may witness the tests. The

Contractor shall conduct and pass an initial FAT. The requirement may be waived when supplies identical or similar to those called for have previously been delivered by the Offeror and accepted by the Government. The Government may exercise a FAT for any reason. First Article hardware shall be representative of items to be manufactured using the same processes and procedures in production. An (additional) first article sample or portion thereof, may be ordered by the Contracting Officer in writing when:

a) A major change is made to the TDP,

b) There is a lapse in production for a period in excess of 90 calendar days, or

c) A change occurs to performance, manufacturing process, material used, drawing, specification or source of supply.

When any or all of the conditions above occurs, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting

Officer so that a determination can be made concerning the need for an additional first article sample or portion thereof, and instructions concerning the submission, inspection, and notification of results are provided by the Government. Costs of the additional FAT resulting from any of the causes listed herein that were originated by the Contractor and not due to changes directed by the Government shall be borne by the Contractor.

3.5.1 First Article Test (FAT) Plan. The Contractor shall develop a First Article Test Plan that is acceptable to and approved by the Government prior to implementation. The Contractor shall submit a FAT plan in accordance with CDRL B007 (First Article Test Plan) for Government approval. The Contractor shall submit the FAT Report, in accordance with CDRL B008

(TEST/INSPECTION REPORT) within fifteen (15) calendar days from the completion of the

FAT. Within 30 calendar days after receiving the test report, the Contracting Officer shall notify the Contractor in writing of the conditional approval, approval, or disapproval of the First

Article. A notice of conditional approval or disapproval shall not relieve the Contractor from complying with all requirements of the specifications and all other terms and conditions of this contract.

(CDRL B007, FAT Plan)

(CDRL B008, FAT Report)

3.5.2 First Article Inspection. The five (5) First Article samples shall be subjected to a 100% dimensional inspection to verify compliance with TDP requirements to include but not limited to: drawings, approved ECPs, approved RFVs, specifications, and associated QAPs, including visual inspection of packaging and the packaging material.

3.5.3 Components and Assemblies. The Contractor shall be responsible for performance of the first article inspection. The first article inspection sample shall consist of each component and assembly that comprises the items being procured. The parts shall be representative of the items to be manufactured during full-rate production, utilizing the same manufacturing processes, equipment, and procedures. These components and assemblies shall be utilized to create the first article systems.

3.5.4 First Article Test (FAT) Rejection. If any component, or test specimen fails to comply with any applicable requirement, the FAT may be disapproved. At the completion of the FAT and within 15 days after acceptance of the FAT Report, the Contracting Officer will notify the

Contractor in writing of the conditional approval, approval, or disapproval of the samples. The notice of conditional approval or approval shall not relieve the Contractor from complying with all requirements of the specifications and all other terms and conditions of the contract. A notice of conditional approval will state any further action required of the Contractor. A notice of disapproval will cite reasons for the disapproval.

3.5.5 Lot Acceptance. The maximum lot size shall be established by the Contractor but requires approval from the Government. Each inspection lot shall be identified with a lot number. The reason for rejection of any inspection lot shall be recorded. When a rejected lot is resubmitted after Government-approved reconditioning, it shall be identified as such.

(CDRL B009, LAT Plan)

3.5.6 Lot Acceptance Inspection and Test. The Contractor shall perform Lot Acceptance

Testing (LAT) in accordance with the TDP and this SOW. The Contractor shall submit an LAT plan in accordance CDRL B009 for Government approval. At least 30 calendar days before the beginning of Lot Acceptance Testing, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing of the time and location of the testing so that the Government may witness the tests. The

Contractor shall commence LAT within 14 calendar days after the lot production is completed.

The LAT shall be conducted at the Contractor’s facilities and/or at facilities that the Contractor has contracted out. The LAT may or may not be witnessed by a Government representative. The

Contractor shall submit the lot acceptance test report with the DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report for Government review prior to lot acceptance by the Government.

(CDRL B009, LAT Plan)

(CDRL B010, LAT Report)

3.5.7 Failure Analysis Report. In the event of a failure of the first article or lot sample to meet requirements, the Contractor shall conduct a failure analysis to identify the reason(s) for failure, test results to demonstrate the failure is understood and reproducible and propose validated solutions to preclude future failures of the same nature. These activities, findings, and results shall be summarized in a Failure Summary and Analysis Report.

(CDRL B011, Failure Summary and Analysis Report)

3.5.8 Test Article Disposal. The Contractor shall pay the expenses associated with returning test articles consumed during Government testing to the Contractor for disposal.

Supply Support and Sustainment Planning.

3.6.1 Repair Kits. The Contractor shall assemble individual and organizational repair kits as ordered under CLINs 0xxx and 0xxx as well as provide the required quantities in accordance with the delivery instructions identified in each delivery order. Individual and organizational repair parts and components will be listed in Exhibit X and Exhibit X.

3.6.2 Provisioning Parts List (PPL). The PPL shall contain the end-item, component, or assembly and all support items that can be disassembled, reassembled, or replaced at the Field

Level of Maintenance (LoM). The Contractor may use MCO 4790.25 Ground Equipment

Maintenance Program (GEMP) as a guide for Marine Corps LoM.

(CDRL C001, Provisioning Parts List)

3.6.3 Recommended Buy List (RBL). The Contractor shall provide recommendations for a

RBL for the Initial Issue Provisioning spares packages and shall provide the currently available supporting Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Durability data for the RBL. The RBL shall contain nomenclature, Contractor part number, cost of part (to include step ladder pricing), CAGE code, and recommended quantities for a period of two (2) years. The Contractor shall provide the RBL during the PAC/PGC.

(CDRL C002, Recommended Buy List)

3.6.4 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS). The Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer in writing whenever the Contractor believes that one (1) or more of the components of materials intended to be incorporated directly into an item specified to be delivered under the purchase order or contract is a Diminishing Manufacturing

Sources (DMS) component. The notice shall identify the part number, National Stock Number, and nomenclature of each DMS component.

(CDRL C003: DMSMS Report)

3.6.5 Item Unique Identification (IUID). The Contractor shall comply with MIL-STD-130N, DoDI 5000.64, and DoDM 4140.01 using Government provided TDP. The two-dimensional

IUID data matrix shall be machine-readable with scanning devices and shall be accompanied by the corresponding human readable markings when practical. All two-dimensional data matrices shall be permanently affixed or engraved and able to withstand and perform within the same environmental conditions as the RHGPK. Proposed size and location of IUID markings shall be

IAW Government TDP provided to the Contractor.

3.6.6 Warranty. The Contractor shall provide warranty of the hardware and spare parts that shall be free from manufacturing defects in material and workmanship for a period of twelve

(12) months from date of accepted Form DD 250. Warranty repairs shall be corrected by the

Contractor without additional cost to the Government.

3.6.7 Preservation and Packaging. The Contractor shall develop packaging data in accordance with MIL-STD-2073-1 and all appendices for the end item and all repairable components. The

Contractor shall preserve and package (P&P) all items scheduled for domestic shipment for immediate use in accordance with the best commercial practices of ASTM D3951. The

Contractor shall P&P items scheduled for overseas shipment for immediate use in accordance with the best commercial practices of ASTM D3951, Export Requirements. The Contractor shall

P&P items scheduled for storage, as identified by the instructions provided in each specific delivery order with the Level “B” requirements of MIL-STD-2073-1, Method 31. The Contractor shall P&P spare or repairable components that are not, Electrostatic Sensitive Devices (ESD) in accordance with the best commercial practices of ASTM D3951. Packaging and Preservation data shall be updated upon implementation of any Government directed ECPs and delivered to the Government for approval.

(CDRL C004, Preservation and Packaging Data)

Security Requirements. The information provided to the Contractor will be unclassified and/or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The Contractor is not required or expected to have a Facility Clearance and Contractor personnel supporting this effort are not required to possess Personnel Clearance Levels.