17R1217-_USMC_Pack_Solicitation-_Amendment_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to: 1) update Section M.1 and 2) update the Government's Response to Industry Questions attachment.

Updated information is highlighted in yellow for convenience. Please see page 2 for details.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-May-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M6785417R1217

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Apr-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-May-2017

CODE

MARCORSYSCOM

2200 LESTER ST

QUANTICO VA 22134

M67854 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M6785417R1217

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

BASIS FOR AWARD

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

SECTION M

M.1 BASIS FOR AWARD

This acquisition uses Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection procedures in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.101-2. The Government will make no technical tradeoffs and give no additional credit for exceeding the minimum technical requirements. The Marine Corps System Command (MCSC) will award one, 60-month, Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for the USMC Pack System to a responsible Offeror whose proposal submission conforms to the solicitation’s requirements, has the lowest evaluated price, and is technically acceptable with acceptable past performance. and the lowest evaluated price.

To award, the Government will first evaluate the PDMs against Factor 1 (Technical Capability), Subfactor 1 (End Item Visual Examination) and Subfactor 2 (End Item Dimensional & Fit Examination) to determine the PDMs' technical acceptability. The Government will next organize the proposals associated with the acceptable PDMs by total evaluated price from lowest to highest. Beginning with the lowest priced proposal with a technically acceptable PDM, the Government will continue evaluating the Factor 1, Subfactor 3 (Compliance with Performance Requirements) and Subfactor 4 (Manufacturing Capability) as well as Factor 2 (Past Performance) for acceptability. A proposal must be acceptable in all factors and subfactors listed in the solicitation to be technically acceptable for award. If the lowest-priced proposal with a technically acceptable PDM is unacceptable in Subfactor 3, Subfactor 4 of Factor 1 or unacceptable in Factor 2, the Government will progress to evaluate the next lowest-priced offeror with a technically acceptable PDM in the same manner until reaching an awardable offeror that is acceptable in Factor 1 and Factor 2. The Government will evaluate no further proposals after determining that a lowest price offeror is acceptable under Factor 1 and Factor 2 and therefore awardable, nor will the Government make any partial awards.

Table 1: Evaluation Factors

Factor 1 Technical Capability

- Subfactor 1 - End Item Visual Examination

- Subfactor 2 - End Item Dimensional & Fit Examination

- Subfactor 3 - Compliance with Performance Requirements

- Subfactor 4 - Manufacturing Capability Factor 2 Past Performance Factor 3 Price

The Government will use the following to represent the rating given for Factor 1, Technical Capability. The rating will only apply to the factor level.

TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY RATINGS

Rating Definition http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm#P25_3805

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and make an award on an “initial offer” without discussions. Should the Government determine that discussions are necessary; it will establish a competitive range and notify all Offerors in writing of their inclusion or exclusion. Discussions will occur only with Offerors in the competitive range. Upon receiving Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs), the Government will organize offers by dollar value from lowest to highest and evaluate FPRs in the same manner it evaluated the original proposals. If the lowest-priced offeror is not technically acceptable, the Government will progress to the next lowest-price offeror until an offeror is awardable for being technically acceptable with acceptable past performance.

M.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor : Technical Capability

Subfactor 1: End Item Visual Examination Subfactor 2: End Item Dimensional & Fit Examination Subfactor 3: Compliance with Performance Requirements Subfactor 4: Manufacturing Capability

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Price

The Government will use the following to represent the rating given for Factor 1, Technical Capability. The rating will only apply to the factor level.

TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY RATINGS

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

M.2.1 Factor 1: Technical Capability

M.2.1.1 Subfactor 1: End Item Visual Examination Using one Product Demonstration Model, The Government will conduct End Item Visual Examination in accordance with the tables below as outlined in the FILBE DTLSPEC dated 18 April 2017. The technical evaluation board may disassemble or destroy Product Demonstration Models (PDMs) during inspection or evaluation, and the Government may not return any PDMs used for evaluation.

Pass/Fail Criteria for Subfactor 1 is as follows:

a. Table IV. Infrared Spectral Reflectance Requirements for Coyote 498 (Class I) and Tan 499 (Class 6)

When the measured reflectance values at four or more wavelengths do not meet the limits specified below, it will constitute a test failure and render the entire proposal technically unacceptable.

Table IV. Infrared Spectral Reflectance Requirements for Coyote 498

WAVELENGTH

(nm)

REFLECTANCE (%)

MIN MAX

600 8 20 620 8 20

640 8 22 660 8 24 680 12 24 700 12 34 720 16 42 740 22 46 760 30 50 780 34 54 800 36 56 820 38 58 840 38 58 860 40 60

b. Table XI. Infrared Spectral Reflectance Requirements for Black 357

When the measured reflectance values at four or more wavelengths do not meet the limits specified below, it will constitute a test failure and render the entire proposal technically unacceptable.

Table XI. Infrared Spectral Reflectance Requirements for Black 357

c. Table XIII. End Item Visual Examination The Government will conduct an End Item Visual Examination upon both PDMs. Four or more total major defect findings across both PDMs constitutes a test failure rendering the entire proposal technically unacceptable. (E.g., two PDMs with two major defects each constitutes a test failure because there are four total major defects among the two PDMs.) Seven or more total minor defect findings among both PDMs constitutes a test failure rendering the entire proposal technically unacceptable. (E.g., a PDM with three minor defects and a PDM with four minor defects would constitute a test failure because there are seven total minor defects among the two PDMs.) Defects repeating across PDMs constitute one defect. (E.g., Subassemblies not attached as specified on both PDMs counts as one defect.)

Table XIII. End Item Visual Examination

CLASSIFICATION

EXAMINE DEFECT MAJOR MINOR

Fabric Hole, cut, tear, smash, broken or missing yarn, or open place clearly visible at normal inspection distance (approximately 3 feet)

Shade bar or abrasion mark 201 Defective or partially omitted coating 202 Webbing or Tape Any hole, cut, tears, or smash 102 Not firmly and tightly woven, edges frayed or scalloped 103

WAVELENGTH

(nm) Max 700 20 720 30 740 33 760 33 780 34 800 34 820 35 840 35 860 35

Multiple floats 203 Abrasion mark, slub, or broken end or pick 104 Cut ends of webbing not fused as specified 105 Fastener Tape Any hole, cut, or tear 106 Hooks flattened, broken, or missing and impairing function 107

Hardware

Broken or malformed, failing to serve intended purpose, corroded area, burr or sharp edge

Finish omitted or not as specified:

- on brass or aluminum components

- on steel components

Area of partial or no finish 110

Any required component improperly installed causing failure to serve intended purpose 111

Not assembled as specified 112 Size or type not as specified 205

Snap fasteners

Any fastener not functioning properly (i.e. fails to snap closed, provide a secure closure, or to open freely)

NOTE: The fasteners shall be snapped and un-snapped twice to determine whether parts of fastener separate freely; and also affect a secure closure

Clinched excessively tight, cutting adjacent material 114

Clinched loosely, permitting any component to rotate freely but not to the degree that any component can be expected to become detached during use

Clinched loosely to the degree that components can be expected to become detached during use NOTE: Incomplete roll of end of button or eyelet barrel is evidence of improper and insecure clinching

Incorrect style 116 Any split in eyelet or button barrels 207 Drawstrings Cut, chafed, or abraded 117 Ends not fused 208 Not threaded through grommets or knotted as specified 209 Omitted 118

EXAMINE DEFECT MAJOR MINOR

Barrel lock Reversed 210 Sub-assemblies Not attached as specified 211 Brass grommets and eyelets

Clinched excessively tight, cutting adjacent material 119

Insecurely clinched to a degree that grommet or eyelet may be detached from material

Washer installed on incorrect side of material 212 Eyelet barrel split 213 Slide fastener

Not functioning properly, failing to effect a secure closure or to open freely

Not specified type or size 214 Slider jams or fails to interlock 122

Thong omitted 123 Fastener tape cut or torn 124

SEAMS AND STITCHING:

Open seam 1/2 inch or less 215 More than 1/2 inch

NOTE: A seam shall be classified as open when one or more stitches joining a seam are broken or when two or more consecutive skipped or run-off stitches occur. On double stitched seams, a seam shall be considered open when either one or both sides of the seam are open

Raw edge (on edge required to be finished)

More than 1/2 inch when securely caught in stitching NOTE: Raw edge not securely caught in stitching shall be classified as an open seam

Run-off (see open seam)

Seam and stitch type Wrong seam or stitch type 126 Bartacks Any bartack omitted 127 Any bartack not as specified or not in specified location 217 Loose stitching, incomplete or broken 218 Stitch tension Loose, resulting in loose bobbin or top thread 219 Excessively tight, resulting in puckering of material 220 Stitches per inch Up to two stitches less than minimum specified 221 Three or more stitches less than minimum specified 128 One or more stitches in excess of maximum specified

NOTE: Variation in the number of stitches per inch caused by the operator speeding up the machine and pulling the fabric in order to sew over heavy seams, or in turning corner shall be classified as follows:

(a) Within the minor defect classification no defect

(b) Within the major defect classification minor defect

Stitching ends Not secured as specified. 223 Thread breaks, skipped stitches, or run-offs

Not overstitched as specified NOTE: Thread breaks or two or more consecutive skipped or run-off stitches not overstitched shall be classified as open seams

Rows of stitching Any row missing except on box, and box-x stitching 129

On box, and box-x stitching:

- one row of stitching omitted

- two or more rows of stitching omitted

Component and assembly Any component part omitted or not as specified or any operation omitted or not as specified (unless otherwise classified herein)

Needle chews 132 Any mend, darn, patch, splice or other unauthorized repair 133 Any material pleated or caught in stitching where not specified

Plastic frame; Chip, cut, crack, splinter, broken end or space, failing to 134

Stiffener or Film serve intended purpose Binding Loosely applied but not exposing raw edge of material 227 Loosely applied exposing raw edge of material 135 Ends of binding on pocket flap and on ammunition pockets not caught in seams

Ends of binding on pocket flap and on grenade pockets not caught in seams

Darts (on pouch pocket flaps)

Not formed and sewn separately on pouch pocket flap as specified

One or more omitted 230 Ammunition and grenade pocket and flap Flaps improperly set or distorted failing to affect a full and smooth closure

Pocket or flap not formed as specified 231 Binding tape not securely attached 232

Cleanness Grease, oil, dirt or ink stains clearly noticeable 233 Thread ends not trimmed as specified 234 Location markings Drilled or Permanent 138 Printed marking more than 1/32 inch in width or not covered by component part

M.2.1.2 Subfactor 2: End Item Dimensional & Fit Examination

The Government will evaluate PDMs for compliance with the FILBE DTLSPEC dated 18 April 2017.

The Government will evaluate one PDM against Table XIV and Table XV of in the FILBE DTLSPEC dated 18 April 2017. The Government may disassemble the PDM for the evaluation.

The Government may evaluate the PDM against one or more tests listed in Table XVI: Material Tests outlined in the FILBE DTLSPEC dated 18 April 2017. The Government may request additional raw materials or finished end items if it requires a test.

The inability to meet the end item fit requirement, as outlined in the FILBE DTLSPEC dated 18 April 2017 shall constitute a failure and render the proposal technically unacceptable.

Should a specified item or material not be commercially available at the time of PDM submission, the Offeror may provide a written corrective action with the proposal submission detailing its plan to comply with the requirement for FAT and production. This absent item/material will not be considered a defect if the corrective action plan demonstrates that the FAT and production units will meet the requirement that is absent in the PDM. Any item or material not meeting the specified requirement and without a corrective action plan will render the proposal unacceptable.

Pass/Fail Criteria is as follows:

a. Table XIV. End Item Dimensional Examination The Government will conduct an End Item Dimensional Examination upon both PDMs. Two or more total major defect findings across both PDMs constitutes a test failure rendering the entire proposal technically unacceptable.

(E.g., two PDMs with one major defect each constitutes a test failure because there are two total major defects among the two PDMs.) Four or more total minor defect findings across both PDMs constitutes a test failure rendering the entire proposal technically unacceptable. (E.g., two PDMs with two minor defects each would constitute a test failure because there are four total minor defects among the two PDMs.) Defects repeating across PDMs constitute one defect. (E.g., Grommets set off center on hems by more than 1/4 inch on both PDMs count as one defect.)

Table XIV. End Item Dimensional Examination

Dimensions (overall) Smaller than nominal dimensions and applicable minus tolerance indicated on drawings.

Larger than nominal dimensions and applicable plus tolerance.

Component and location dimensions

Not within specified tolerance 238

Stitch margin or gage Not within specified tolerance 239 Box, box-x and stitching Dimensions not within specified tolerance 240 Brass eyelets Not spaced on equipment within specified dimensions 241 Grommets Set off center on hems by more than 1/4 inch 141

b. Table XV. End Item Fit Examination

Failing to meet the End Item Fit Examination requirement renders the entire proposal technically unacceptable.

Table XV. End Item Fit Examination

Gauge fit into pocket/ pouches & closure of flaps

Failure of gauge to fit properly within pocket/pouches without excessive force. Inability to completely close flap down in order to secure the strap fastener without applying excessive force.

Note: The gauges referenced in the table above replicate items, such as radios, carried in the USMC Pack system.

c. Table XVI. Material Tests

Failing to meet three or more of the Material Test requirements renders the entire proposal technically unacceptable.

Table XIV. Material Tests

Characteristic Required Paragraph Test Method

Fabric Textured Nylon Weight 3.5.2 ASTM D 3776 Breaking strength 3.5.2 ASTM D 5034 Water repellency 3.5.2 AATCC METHODS Colorfastness to:

Laundering, after 3 cycles 3.8.2 AATCC METHOD 61-1994 Laundering (accelerated black print only) 3.8.2 AATCC METHOD 61-1994 Light 3.8.2 METHOD 16-1993 Crocking 3.8.2 METHOD 8-1989 Resistance to frosting, for carbon black 3.7.4 METHOD 119 1/

Infrared reflectance Table 1 / 4.4.1 Matching standard sample 3.8.1 Visual Spray rating ATCC-22 Direct Transfer Hydrostatic resistance ATCC-127 Thread Breaking strength 3.5.1 ASTM D 2207 Water repellency 3.5.1 / 4.4.4 ASTM D 2207 2/

Characteristic Required Paragraph Test Method

Webbing and Tape 1 inch webbing 3.5.6.1 Weight 3.5.6.1 ASTM D 3776 Breaking strength 3.5.6.1 3/ Fastness to:

Laundering 3.5.6.1 AATCC 61-1994 4/ Light 3.5.6.1 AATCC 16-1993 5/ Crocking 3.7.11.1 AATCC 8-1989 1 inch elastic webbing 3.5.6.2 Weight 3.5.6.2 ASTM D-3776 Load range 3.5.6.2 3/ Tension set 3.5.6.2 3/ Fastness to:

Laundering 3.5.6.2 AATCC 61-1994 4/ Light 3.5.6.2 AATCC 16-1993 5/ Crocking 3.5.6.2 AATCC 8-1989 1 ½ inch webbing 3.5.6.4 Weight 3.5.6.4 ASTM D-3776 Breaking strength 3.5.6.4 3/ Fastness to: 3.5.6.4 Laundering 3.5.6.4 AATCC 61-1994 4/ Light 3.5.6.4 AATCC 16-1993 5/ Crocking 3.5.6.4 AATCC 8-1989 Spectral reflectance 3.5.6.4/4.4.1 3 ½ inch webbing 3.5.6.5 Weight 3.5.6.5 ASTM D-3776 Breaking strength 3.5.6.5 3/ Fastness to:

Laundering 3.5.6.5 AATCC 61-1994 4/ Light 3.5.6.5 AATCC 16-1993 5/ Crocking 3.5.6.5 AATCC 8-1989 Spectral reflectance 3.5.6.5/4.4.1 Tape, binding 3.5.6.3 Weight 3.5.6.3 ASTM D-3776 Breaking strength 3.5.6.3 3/ Fastness to:

Laundering 3.5.6.3 AATCC 61-1994 4/ Light 3.5.6.3 AATCC 16-1993 5/

The Government reserves the right not to conduct any or all tests.

M.2.1.3 Subfactor 3: Compliance with Performance Requirements The government will evaluate the USMC Pack system and components per the FILBE DTLSPEC dated 18 April 2017, to include but not limited to the following:

• The Frame’s conformity with the requirements in paragraph 3.3.1.1.

• The Hydration Bladder System’s conformity with the requirements in paragraph 3.3.11, to include 3.3.7 through 3.3.7.5.

• The Sternum Cinch’s conformity with the requirements in paragraph 3.3.8.

• The Sub-Belt’s conformity with the requirements in paragraph 3.3.9.

• The whole system’s durability per the requirements in paragraph 3.12.3 through 3.12.3.1.

M.2.1.4 Subfactor 4: Manufacturing Capability

The Government will use information provided in accordance with Section L.3.2.1.3 to evaluate the Offeror’s ability to deliver 500 USMC Pack Systems and 1,000 parts per month no later than 60 days after FAT acceptance as well as the capability to deliver 6,000 USMC Pack Systems and 12,000 parts over a 12-month period beginning on or about February 2018.

Further, the Government will evaluate an offeror’s Manufacturing Plan and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan for effectiveness in ensuring reliable manufacture of items conforming to technical requirements throughout the contract period of performance.

M.2.3 Factor 2: Past Performance The Government will establish an overall rating, per FAR 15.305(a)(2), of the Offeror’s ability to meet the requirements of the solicitation. The table below describes the ratings.

Table 4: Past Performance Ratings

Rating Evaluation Criteria

Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below)

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.308(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

M.2.4 Factor 3: Price The Government will assess the Offeror for completeness and conduct a price analysis using one or more of the techniques specified in FAR 15.404-1(b)(2) to determine price reasonableness and balanced pricing.

The Government will calculate the total evaluated price for the USMC Pack System, Spare Components and associated CDRLs. This total evaluated price will be the sum of the quantities evaluated for all respective CLINs (CLINS 0001 through 0019) priced in accordance with Section B Pricing Instructions.

CLIN Description Evaluation

Quantity Proposed Unit Price

Total

0001 USMC Pack System, Excluding Sub- Belt 18,002 $ = Evaluation Quantity x

Proposed Unit Price

0002 Main Pack Suspension, Assembled 200 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0003 Main Bag 1,800 $ = Evaluation Quantity x

0004 Frame 18,000 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0005 Hip Belt, Complete 1,800 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0006 Shoulder Harness Assembly 14,800 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0007 Sustainment Pouch 3,240 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0008 Hydration Pouch 3,240 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0009 Assault Pack 29,600 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0010 Assault Pouch 3,800 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0011 Replacement Plastic Internal Stiffener 1,800 $ = Evaluation Quantity x

Proposed Unit Price

0012 Hydration Carrier 32,700 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0013 Hydration Bladder 7,500 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0014 Hydration Tube Kit 1,500 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0015 Hydration Bite Valve Cover 1,800 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0016 Sub Belt 6,000 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0017 Sternum Cinch 1,800 $ = Evaluation Quantity x Proposed Unit Price

0018 USMC Pack Buckle Repair Kit - User Level 139,500 $ = Evaluation Quantity x

0019 CDRLs Not Separately Priced

(End of Summary of Changes)