M0068118Q0037_Questionnaire-Attachment1.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M0068118Q0037
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Attachment1 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment2-M0068118Q0037_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment1-M0068118Q0037Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| M0068118Q0037_A00002_FINAL.pdf | ||
| M0068118Q0037_A00002_FINAL_-_Conformed.pdf | ||
| M0068118Q0037A00001Solicitation-FINAL.pdf | ||
| M0068118Q0037Solicitation-FINAL.pdf | ||
| M0068118Q0037Pricing_Spreadsheet-Attachment2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the U.S. Marine Corps, Camp Pendleton Regional Contracting Office to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: melodee.hall@usmc.mil.
I. Contract Data (for the proposed effort)
Contract Number
Project/Requirement
Customer/Agency
Project/Requirement Description
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |X| N/A |
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
V. Performance Evaluation
1. Technical Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the technical requirements of your contract?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Performance
Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.
2. Schedule Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Schedule Performance
Please provide rationale for assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s schedule performance in the following areas.
| Schedule Performance |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Work completed on time.
The Contractor’s ability to resolve Schedule Problems
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
3. Management
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Management
b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.
| Management |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS—Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND Customer satisfaction.
SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
4. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost Control
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
VII. General Comments:
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it.