M0026424R0006 Instructional Support Evaluation Form FINAL (Attachment 3).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M0026424R0006
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document appears to be an Instructional Support Evaluation Form (Attachment 3) related to the Marine Corps University Wargaming Training and Education Support Services Contract solicitation (M0026424R0006). The evaluation form assesses vendors' understanding and capabilities in the areas of wargaming methods, solutions, tools and terminology, as well as their knowledge of educational frameworks and the Professional Military Education (PME) environment. The form provides scoring criteria ranging from "Excellent (5)" to "Absent or Plagiarized (0)" for evaluating vendors' responses in these key areas. The overall solicitation is seeking services to support the Marine Corps University's wargaming training and education requirements.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Excellent (5) | Good (3) | Poor (1) | Absent or Plagiarized (0) | Total Points | |
| 1. Awareness of Wargaming Methods. | Vendor displays an excellent understanding of available wargaming methods and proposed methods that would not only enable and enhance PME learning outcomes. | Vendor displays an base line understanding of available wargaming methods and proposed methods that would meet the PME learning outcomes. | Proposed Methods are not consistent with PME learning frameworks and outcomes. | Missing or plagiarized | |
| 2. Awareness of Wargaming Solutions. | Vendor displays an excellent understanding of available wargaming solutions that could enable and enhance the PME learning outcomes. | Vendor displays an base line understanding of available wargaming solutions that would meet the PME learning outcomes. | Proposed Solutions do not align with PME learning frameworks and outcomes. | Missing or plagiarized | |
| 3. Evaluation of Wargaming Tools and Methods | The vendor demonstrated excellent evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages that various wargaming tools and methods offer for PME use cases. | Vendor articulated an understanding of how to compare two wargaming methodolgies or tools. | Explanation of the advantages and disadvantages does not indicate that the vendor has an understanding of the unique opportunities and challenges of wargaming in a PME environment. | Missing or plagiarized | |
| 4. Wargaming & Joint Force Terminology. | The vendor displayed excellent knowledge of wargaming terms and of joint warfighting doctrinal terms and concepts as they relate to the defined scenario. | Vendor displays a basic understanding of currently joint force terminology and aligns them correctly with the scenario and proposed solution. | Terminology is incorrect or does not align to the scenario and proposed solution | Missing or plagiarized | |
| 5. Educational Frameworks. | The vendor displayed excellent knowledge of educational frameworks, adult learning concepts, and PME learning outcomes and environment. | The vendor displayed suitable knowledge of the professional military education environment, adult learning concepts, and potential learning outcomes | The vendor did not display a clear understanding of adult learning concepts and does not show a clear understanding of PME or Learning outcomes. | Missing or plagiarized |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .