Attachment_1_-_PPQ.pdf

Attachment 1

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions:

The Offeror will complete Sections II and III (blocks A through C) and provide the form to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror on a previous relevant contract). The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the

Solicitation) copies of Sections I through III of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.

The assessor, will verify Sections II and III, correcting any information accordingly. The assessor will complete the questionnaire and submit it to the Contracting Office.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the US Marine Corps to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail or FAX the completed questionnaire(s) to: judith campbell@usmc.mil or fax to 703-784-

5908.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

Solicitation Number M00264-18-R-0001

Project/Requirement Marine Sierra Hotel Aviation Readiness Program (M-

SHARP)

Customer/Agency Training and Education Command (TECOM)

Project/Requirement Description The objective of this requirement is to continue execution of efforts to deploy and support M-SHARP and implement new and enhanced functionality of the application by July 2020 and beyond to fully support the Fleet Marine Forces, Headquarters

Marine Corps (HQMC) and Aviation Training System (ATS) needs of Marine aviation, allow more simulator and ground utilization, increase functionality on multiplatform based systems, and increase security and current functionality. M-

SHARP application increased functionality and sustainment will allow for ground and other units to use and build on current capabilities. Sustained development and support of a user friendly, web-based and stand-alone application are paramount to ensure M-SHARP remains a viable and authoritative resource for US Marine Corps Aviation flight hour and sortie based training data.

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is correct or incorrect.

CONTRACTOR NAME &

ADDRESS:

Contract No

Type of Contract mailto:jason.r.griffin1@usmc.mil

Initial Final

Contract Value

Period of

Performance/Delivery

Schedule

Project/Requirement

Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR

Termination History Convenience Default N/A

III. Assessor Information

A. Assessor Name

B. Title

C. Phone Number/Email Address

D. Assessor to identify role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA)

Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Customer Satisfaction

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the customer satisfaction?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Customer

Satisfaction

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

2. Timeliness

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule

(Timeliness)?

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Performance

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness in

Completion of

Contract/Task

Order/Delivery

Timeliness in

Meeting

Milestones

Timeliness in

Submitting

Deliverables

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please explain your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

Timeliness

3. Technical Success

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s technical success?

Technical

Success

b. Assess the Contractor’s technical success in the following areas.

Technical Success Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

TECHNICAL

EXECUTION—(timeliness, completeness, and quality of products and service, problem identification, quote submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)

SUBCONTRACT

MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.)

PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT—

(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)

MANAGEMENT OF

PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the

Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)

INTEGRATED PRODUCT

TEAM MANAGEMENT—

(commitment and participation to the IPT process)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

4. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Quality of

Performance

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Conformance to Contract

Requirements

Conformance to

Specifications

Standards of

Good

Workmanship

(technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

5. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Cost Control

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

COST/PRICE

ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)

COST EFFICIENCIES—

(realization of any in accomplishing contracted effort)

INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission

FORECASTING/MANAGE

MENT/COST CONTROL

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments: