Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-102725 Statewide Survey Database Checks and Survey Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000446
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and local agencies to assess consultant performance on completed projects. The form captures evaluations across two primary rating categories: Management (four factors) and Prosecution and Progress (three factors). The Management section evaluates the consultant's resource management, independence from agency staff, adherence to scope of work, and communication and responsiveness. The Prosecution and Progress section assesses whether deliverables were completed by agreed-upon dates, whether invoices, studies, reports, and design requirements were complete and accurate with minimal revisions, and whether work remained within budget constraints. The evaluation uses a five-point scale where 5 indicates exceeding requirements, 3 indicates meeting requirements, and 1 indicates not meeting requirements, with N/A as an option when applicable.

The form includes sections for consultant and agency project manager information, project description, scope, phase, and service dates. Evaluators must provide written justifications for all scores, and both the agency project manager and consultant have signature lines for acknowledgment. The scoring methodology weights individual ratings based on the number of factors rated, with single-factor sections worth up to 50 points and multi-factor sections proportionally scaled. The form requires sign-off from the Agency/Owner PM, the Consultant PM, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, creating a formal record of project performance for future reference and qualification assessments.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .