Legacy Evaluation Form (1).xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-050626 Drainage Analysis Inventory & Inspection Services (DAII)
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000569
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and local agencies to assess consultant performance on project delivery. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management (four factors) and Prosecution and Progress (three factors). Management factors assess resource management, consultant independence, scope adherence, and communication and cooperation with agency staff. Prosecution and Progress factors evaluate timely completion of deliverables, quality and completeness of invoices and documentation, and budget compliance. The evaluation is applied to the Drainage Analysis Inventory & Inspection Services (DAII) project in Georgia, which involves drainage analysis, inventory, and inspection services. The form structure allows for evaluation dates, project phases, service dates, and consultant/agency information to be documented.

The scoring methodology employs a five-point scale where 5 indicates exceeding requirements and expectations, 3 indicates meeting requirements and expectations, 1 indicates failing to meet requirements and expectations, and N/A is available when not applicable. Scores are weighted and totaled based on the number of rating factors, with a single factor worth 50 points, two factors worth 30 and 20 points respectively, three factors worth approximately 16.67 points each, and four factors worth 12.50 points each. The form requires justification for all scores from the Agency/Owner Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert, provides space for consultant response, and requires signatures from the Agency/Owner PM, Consultant PM, and Agency Evaluator's Supervisor to formalize the evaluation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
IM_Manual.pdf PDF
LAP Evaluation Form (1).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Statewide Stormwater Field Maps Manual_v3.pdf PDF
RFQ_484_050626 Drainage Analysis Inventory Se.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .