LAP Evaluation Form (1).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000569
- Issued by
- Georgia
About this file
This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on state and local transportation projects, specifically related to Drainage Analysis Inventory & Inspection Services (DAII). The evaluation form is designed to rate consultant performance across two primary categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The form captures essential project information including the GDOT Project Identification Number, Project Manager details, Agency information, Project Description & Scope, Project Phase, and Service Dates. Evaluators assess consultant performance on factors such as resource management, independence from agency staff support, scope adherence, communication and cooperation with GDOT personnel, timely delivery of deliverables, completeness and accuracy of invoices and reports, and budget compliance.
The evaluation utilizes a five-point rating scale where 5 indicates performance that exceeds requirements and expectations, 3 indicates performance that meets requirements and expectations, and 1 indicates performance that does not meet requirements and expectations, with N/A available when not applicable. Scores are weighted through a scoring factor table that assigns point values based on the number of rated items, with single ratings valued at 50 points for a score of 5, 30 points for a score of 3, and 10 points for a score of 1. The form requires mandatory justification from the GDOT Project Manager for all scores and includes signature blocks for GDOT Project Manager, Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, and Consultant Project Manager acknowledgment. Additionally, Assistant Office Head and Office Head acknowledgements are required if any rating of 1 is recorded, ensuring executive oversight of substandard performance evaluations.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| IM_Manual.pdf | ||
| Legacy Evaluation Form (1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Statewide Stormwater Field Maps Manual_v3.pdf | ||
| RFQ_484_050626 Drainage Analysis Inventory Se.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
LAP Evaluation Form
Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form
Evaluation Date:
Consultant:
GDOT PI No:
GDOT PM:
Agency:
Agency PM:
Phone:
Email:
Project Description & Scope:
Project Phase:
Service Dates:
Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation
| A | Management | Rating | Factor | ||
| 1 | Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.) | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 2 | Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 3 | Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 4 | Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
| B | Prosecution and Progress | Rating | Factor | ||
| 5 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 6 | All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 7 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
Total Score: 0
| GDOT PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: | |
| Supervisor's Acknowledgement: |
Local's Comments:
Local's Acknowledgement:
| The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above. |
| AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement: |
| Consultant PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
| Agency Evaluator's | ||
| Supervisor (if applicable): | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
&12&A Page &P of &N
Scoring
| 1 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| N/A | |||||
| Factor Table | |||||
| Section Value: | 50 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | Ratings | 50.00 | 30.00 | 10.00 | |
| 2 | Ratings | 25.00 | 15.00 | 5.00 | |
| 3 | Ratings | 16.67 | 10.00 | 3.33 | |
| 4 | Ratings | 12.50 | 7.50 | 2.50 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .