LAP Evaluation Form (1).xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-050626 Drainage Analysis Inventory & Inspection Services (DAII)
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000569
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on state and local transportation projects, specifically related to Drainage Analysis Inventory & Inspection Services (DAII). The evaluation form is designed to rate consultant performance across two primary categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The form captures essential project information including the GDOT Project Identification Number, Project Manager details, Agency information, Project Description & Scope, Project Phase, and Service Dates. Evaluators assess consultant performance on factors such as resource management, independence from agency staff support, scope adherence, communication and cooperation with GDOT personnel, timely delivery of deliverables, completeness and accuracy of invoices and reports, and budget compliance.

The evaluation utilizes a five-point rating scale where 5 indicates performance that exceeds requirements and expectations, 3 indicates performance that meets requirements and expectations, and 1 indicates performance that does not meet requirements and expectations, with N/A available when not applicable. Scores are weighted through a scoring factor table that assigns point values based on the number of rated items, with single ratings valued at 50 points for a score of 5, 30 points for a score of 3, and 10 points for a score of 1. The form requires mandatory justification from the GDOT Project Manager for all scores and includes signature blocks for GDOT Project Manager, Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, and Consultant Project Manager acknowledgment. Additionally, Assistant Office Head and Office Head acknowledgements are required if any rating of 1 is recorded, ensuring executive oversight of substandard performance evaluations.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
IM_Manual.pdf PDF
Legacy Evaluation Form (1).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Statewide Stormwater Field Maps Manual_v3.pdf PDF
RFQ_484_050626 Drainage Analysis Inventory Se.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .