LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFQ-484-120325
- Solicitation number
- PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000466
- Issued by
- Fulton County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on contracted projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The evaluation captures project-specific information including the GDOT Project Identification Number, project phase, service dates, and identifies key personnel such as the GDOT Project Manager, Agency Project Manager, and consultant representative. The form does not specify quantities, response dates, bid deadlines, site visits, or bidders' conferences, as it functions as a post-performance assessment tool rather than an initial solicitation document.
The evaluation employs a standardized scoring scale where ratings of 5 indicate exceeds requirements, 3 indicates meets requirements, and 1 indicates does not meet requirements, with N/A as an option. The form includes detailed scoring tables that calculate weighted values based on the number of rated factors, with point allocations ranging from 50 points for a single factor rated as 1, down to 2.50 points for four factors rated as 1. The evaluation requires documented justifications from the GDOT Project Manager for all scores, optional consultant responses, and acknowledgments from supervisory and office leadership when any factor receives a rating of 1. Signatures and dates are required from the GDOT Project Manager, consultant Project Manager, Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, and in cases of low ratings, the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ_484_120325 Roadway Design Review Services.pdf | ||
| Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ_484_120325 ADDENDUM 1.pdf | ||
| RFQ_484_120325 (Shortlist) .pdf | ||
| RFQ_484_120325 Notice of Award.pdf | ||
| RFQ_484_120325 _Selection of Firm for Negotia.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
LAP Evaluation Form
Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form
Evaluation Date:
Consultant:
GDOT PI No:
GDOT PM:
Agency:
Agency PM:
Phone:
Email:
Project Description & Scope:
Project Phase:
Service Dates:
Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation
| A | Management | Rating | Factor | ||
| 1 | Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.) | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 2 | Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 3 | Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 4 | Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
| B | Prosecution and Progress | Rating | Factor | ||
| 5 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 6 | All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 7 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
Total Score: 0
| GDOT PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: | |
| Supervisor's Acknowledgement: |
Local's Comments:
Local's Acknowledgement:
| The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above. |
| AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement: |
| Consultant PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
| Agency Evaluator's | ||
| Supervisor (if applicable): | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
&12&A Page &P of &N
Scoring
| 1 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| N/A | |||||
| Factor Table | |||||
| Section Value: | 50 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | Ratings | 50.00 | 30.00 | 10.00 | |
| 2 | Ratings | 25.00 | 15.00 | 5.00 | |
| 3 | Ratings | 16.67 | 10.00 | 3.33 | |
| 4 | Ratings | 12.50 | 7.50 | 2.50 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .