LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFQ-484-081726 Environmental Support Services
- Solicitation number
- PE-48401-RFQ-2027-000000613
- Issued by
- Georgia
About this file
This document is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on state and local projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution/Progress. The Management section assesses the consultant's resource management, independence from agency staff, adherence to scope of work, and communication and cooperation with GDOT personnel. The Prosecution and Progress section evaluates whether deliverables were completed by agreed-upon dates, whether invoices and reports are complete and accurate with minimal revisions, and whether work was completed within the assigned budget. Each evaluation factor is scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating performance that exceeds requirements and expectations, 3 indicating performance that meets requirements and expectations, and 1 indicating performance that does not meet requirements and expectations.
The evaluation form employs a weighted scoring methodology where total scores are calculated based on the number of rating factors completed, with values ranging from 50 points for a single rating of 5 to 2.5 points for a single rating of 1. The form requires documentation of justifications for all scores provided by the GDOT Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert, with space for consultant response if applicable. Signatures and acknowledgments are required from the GDOT Project Manager, Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, and Consultant Project Manager. Additionally, acknowledgments from the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head are mandated if any evaluation factor receives a rating of 1, indicating substandard performance that does not meet contract requirements and expectations.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ_484_081726 Environmental Support Services.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
LAP Evaluation Form
Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form
Evaluation Date:
Consultant:
GDOT PI No:
GDOT PM:
Agency:
Agency PM:
Phone:
Email:
Project Description & Scope:
Project Phase:
Service Dates:
Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation
| A | Management | Rating | Factor | ||
| 1 | Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.) | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 2 | Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 3 | Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 4 | Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
| B | Prosecution and Progress | Rating | Factor | ||
| 5 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 6 | All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 7 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
Total Score: 0
| GDOT PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: | |
| Supervisor's Acknowledgement: |
Local's Comments:
Local's Acknowledgement:
| The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above. |
| AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement: |
| Consultant PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
| Agency Evaluator's | ||
| Supervisor (if applicable): | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
&12&A Page &P of &N
Scoring
| 1 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| N/A | |||||
| Factor Table | |||||
| Section Value: | 50 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | Ratings | 50.00 | 30.00 | 10.00 | |
| 2 | Ratings | 25.00 | 15.00 | 5.00 | |
| 3 | Ratings | 16.67 | 10.00 | 3.33 | |
| 4 | Ratings | 12.50 | 7.50 | 2.50 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .