LAP Evaluation Form (2).xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 29 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 484-1123 On-Call Roadway Design Services, Statewide
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2027-000000634
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This document is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on projects. The form is designed to evaluate consultants across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The Management section contains four rating factors assessing the consultant's resource management, independence from agency staff, adherence to scope of work, and communication and cooperation with GDOT personnel. The Prosecution and Progress section includes three rating factors evaluating whether deliverables were completed by agreed-upon dates, whether all invoices, studies, reports, and design requirements were complete and accurate with minimal revisions, and whether work remained within the assigned budget. Evaluations are scored on a five-point scale where 5 indicates exceeding requirements and expectations, 3 indicates meeting requirements and expectations, and 1 indicates not meeting requirements and expectations, with an N/A option available when applicable.

The form includes designated sections for the GDOT Project Manager and Supervisor to provide justifications for assigned scores and for the consultant to respond to the evaluation if desired. Signature lines and acknowledgment fields are provided for the GDOT PM, supervisor, consultant PM, and agency evaluator's supervisor. The form incorporates a scoring table that calculates weighted point values based on the number of factors rated, with individual factor ratings contributing proportional point values to a total score. The evaluation process requires acknowledgment from the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head if any item receives a rating of 1, establishing an escalation protocol for performance deficiencies. This form serves as a quality assurance and performance management tool for GDOT's on-call roadway design services contracts statewide.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 484_112326 On_Call Roadway Design Service.pdf PDF
Legacy Evaluation Form_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .