L-GEE Final IDIQ RFP (with TO1)_3.30.2020.pdf

Issuance Date: March 30, 2020

Questions Due Date: April 22, 2020, 04:00 AM, Jakarta Time

Past Performance Due Date: May 27, 2020, 09:00 AM, Jakarta Time

Closing Date for Proposals: June 3, 2020, 09:00 AM, Jakarta Time

E-mail Submission to: proposals-indo@usaid.gov

NAICS Code: 541990 -- All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Authorized Geographic Code: 937

SUBJECT: Request for Proposal (RFP) No.72049720R00003 USAID/Indonesia – Local Governance Enabling Environment (L-GEE)

Activity

Dear Prospective Offerors:

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is seeking proposals from qualified organizations interested in providing the services described in the attached solicitation.

This procurement will be conducted through full and open competition procedures, pursuant to Part 15 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (48 CFR Chapter I). USAID anticipates awarding a single Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with an initial task order.

The maximum aggregate ordering limitation of contracts resulting from this RFP will not exceed $38.5 million over a five-year ordering period. The maximum aggregate dollar value of task orders awarded to the Contractor cannot exceed this Contract ceiling. There is no guarantee on the number of task orders that the successful contractor will receive or the amount of money beyond the minimum order guarantee set forth in the RFP.

Upon award of the IDIQ contract, USAID anticipates awarding an initial task order. Task Order No. 1 will be a cost-plus fixed fee (CPFF) completion type task order for a total estimated cost of $5.5 - $10 million. Attachment 1 contains the information for Task Order No. 1. Please refer to Section L for information regarding proposal requirements including those related to Task Order No. 1.

USAID encourages the participation to the maximum extent possible of small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns in this activity, as the prime Contractor or as Sub-contractor, in accordance with Part 19 of the FAR. USAID discourages the use of exclusive arrangements as this limits USAID’s ability to receive the best services.

All types of organizations meeting USAID source geographic code 937 are eligible to compete for this award. The Geographic Code of “937” is defined as the United States, the cooperating mailto:proposals-indo@usaid.gov

Page - 2 country, and developing countries other than advanced developing countries, and excluding prohibited sources.

If your organization decides to submit a proposal in response to this solicitation, it must be submitted in accordance with Section L of this RFP. Offerors must also carefully review Section M - Evaluation Factors. Sections B through I of the solicitation and Attachment 1 will become a substantive part of the anticipated IDIQ contract and Task Order No. 1 with blanks to be completed by the Contracting Officer upon award. Section K - Representations, Certifications, and Acknowledgements must be filled out in full.

Proposals are to be submitted to USAID/Indonesia no later than the closing date stated above, to the email address designated in Section L for receipt of proposals. If the proposal is received after the closing date and time, or if it is incomplete, it will not be accepted nor considered unless authorized by the Contracting Officer pursuant to FAR 15.208.

This RFP in no way obligates USAID to award a contract nor does it commit USAID to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal. Award of a contract under this RFP is subject to availability of funds and other internal USAID approvals. Furthermore, USAID reserves the right to reject any and/or all offers if such action is considered to be in the best interest of the Government.

All questions, comments, and/or requests for clarifications must be sent in writing to proposals-indo@usaid.gov no later than the date and time indicated above.

This RFP can be viewed and downloaded from https://beta.sam.gov. This RFP will also be available at www.usaid.gov/indonesia under “Partnership Opportunities.” USAID bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes. Further, be aware that amendments to solicitations are occasionally issued and will be posted on the same websites from which you downloaded this solicitation. USAID advises interested parties to regularly check the above websites for amendments.

Thank you for your interest and we look forward to your participation.

Sincerely, /s/

Alexis McGinness Contracting Officer USAID/Indonesia http://www.usaid.gov/indonesia

72049720R00003

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION2. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. SOLICITATION NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If other than Item 7)

ORDER UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NUMBER

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

SEALED BID (IFB)

5. DATE ISSUED

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED RATING PAGE OF PAGES

1 139

C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

EXT.NUMBERAREA CODE

B. TELEPHONE (NO COLLECT CALLS)A. NAME

10. FOR

INFORMATION

CALL:

CAUTION: LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

(Date)(Hour) local timeuntildepository located in copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if hand carried, in the

SOLICITATION

9. Sealed offers in original and

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

CONTRACT CLAUSES

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACH.

I

J

K

L

M SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

PACKAGING AND MARKING

DESCRIPTION/SPECS./WORK STATEMENT

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSESPART I - THE SCHEDULE

H

G

F

E

D

C

B

A

SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) (X) DESCRIPTION SEC. (X)

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

18. OFFER DATE17. SIGNATURE

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

EXT.NUMBERAREA CODE

15B. TELEPHONE NUMBER

(Type or print)AND

ADDRESS

OF

OFFEROR

CODE FACILITY

16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER15A. NAME

DATEAMENDMENT NO.DATEAMENDMENT NO.

and related documents numbered and dated):

amendments to the SOLICITATION for offerors

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of

14. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

CALENDAR DAYS (%)30 CALENDAR DAYS (%)20 CALENDAR DAYS (%)10 CALENDAR DAYS (%)

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232.8)

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

28. AWARD DATE

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

CODE 24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7)

ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

41 U.S.C. 253 (c) ( 10 U.S.C. 2304 (c) (

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION20. AMOUNT19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED

AWARD (To be completed by government)

CODE

04/01/2020REQ-497-20-000036

X

0900 G 06/03/2020 proposals-indo@usaid.gov

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

PAGE(S)

Alexis McGinness

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

Previous edition is unusable

STANDARD FORM 33 (Rev. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within _____180_________ calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period is inserted

Office of Acquisition & Assistance USAID/Indonesia American Embassy Jakarta Unit 8135 USAID

FPO AP 96520-8135

720497

RFP No.72049720R00003 L-GEE Activity

Page - 4

Table of Contents

Issuance Date: March 30, 2020

SECTION B – SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND COST/PRICES

B.1 PURPOSE

B.2 CONTRACT TYPE AND CONTRACT SERVICES

B.3 MINIMUM OBLIGATED AMOUNT

B.4 MAXIMUM CONTRACT CEILING

B.5 FIXED FEE CEILING (COST-PLUS-FIXED-FEE TASK ORDERS ONLY)

B.6 LABOR

B.7 INDIRECT COSTS AND ADVANCED UNDERSTANDING ON CEILINGS

SECTION C - STATEMENT OF WORK

C.1 TITLE OF ACTIVITY

C.2. PURPOSE, THEORY OF CHANGE, AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES

C.3 ACTIVITY COMPONENTS via TASK ORDERS

C.4. CONTEXT/BACKGROUND

C.5. GEOGRAPHIC TARGETING

C.6. ACTIVITY TASK ORDERS

C.7. COORDINATIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS

C.8 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT

C.9. IDIQ CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

C.10 GRANTS UNDER CONTRACTS

SECTION D - BRANDING AND MARKING

D.1 AIDAR 752.7009 MARKING (January 1993)

D.2 COMPLIANCE WITH BRANDING STRATEGY AND BRANDING

IMPLEMENTATION & MARKING PLANS

D.3 EXCEPTIONS AND WAIVERS TO USAID BRANDING AND MARKING

REQUIREMENTS

D.4 BRANDING AND MARKING FOR GRANTS UNDER CONTRACT

SECTION E – INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

E.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

E.2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

SECTION F – DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

Page - 5

F.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

F.2 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

F.3 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

F.4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

F.5 REPORTS AND DELIVERABLES OR OUTPUTS

F.6 ORDERING PROCEDURES

F.7 TASK ORDER LIMITATIONS

F.8 TASK ORDER ADMINISTRATION

F.9 KEY PERSONNEL

SECTION G – CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

G.1 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICE

G.2 CONTRACTING OFFICER’S AUTHORITY

G.3 CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE (COR)

G.4 CONTRACTOR’S PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT

G.5 TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS/RELATIONSHIP WITH USAID

G.6 ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL

G.7 AIDAR 752.7003 DOCUMENTATION FOR PAYMENT (NOV 1998)

G.8 PAYING OFFICE

G.9 ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

SECTION H – SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

H.1 AUTHORIZED GEOGRAPHIC CODE

H.2 LOGISTICAL SUPPORT

H.3 GRANTS UNDER CONTRACT (GUC)

H.4 AUTHORIZED WORK WEEK

H.5 COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRAFFICKING VICTIMS PROTECTION

REAUTHORIZATION ACT

H.6 DEFENSE BASE ACT (DBA) INSURANCE FOR 2015 – 2020

H.7 BUSINESS CLASS TRAVEL

H.8 FOREIGN GOVERNMENT DELEGATION TO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES

(JAN 2002)

H.9 NONEXPENDABLE PROPERTY PURCHASES AND INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

H.10 APPROVALS – NONEXPENDABLE PROPERTY PURCHASES

H.11 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED FACILITIES OR PROPERTY

Page - 6

H.12 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SYSTEM

H.13 VALUE ADDED TAX AND CUSTOMS DUTIES

H.14 EXECUTIVE ORDER ON TERRORISM FINANCING (FEB 2002)

H.15 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST

H.16 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

H.17 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION

H.18 RESTRICTIONS AGAINST DISCLOSURE (MAY 2016)

H.19 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

H.20 USAID/INDONESIA PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS (MAR

2020)

H.21 COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS (FEB 2020) .

H.22 PUBLICATIONS, VIDEOS, OR OTHER INFORMATION MEDIA PRODUCTS (FEB

2020)

H.23 USAID-FINANCED THIRD-PARTY WEB SITES (NOV 2017)

H.24 SUBMISSION TO THE DEVELOPMENT DATA LIBRARY (DDL)

H.25 SOFTWARE LICENSE ADDENDUM (MAY 2016)

H.26 ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCESSIBILITY (APRIL 2018)

H.27 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPROVAL (APRIL 2018) – (DEVIATION

NO.M/OAA-DEV-FAR-18-2c)

H.28 MEDIA AND INFORMATION HANDLING AND PROTECTION (APRIL 2018)

H.29 PRIVACY AND SECURITY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM INCIDENT

REPORTING (APRIL 2018)

H.30 SKILLS AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVACY AND SECURITY

STAFF (APRIL 2018)

H.31 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES (APRIL 2018)

H.32 CLOUD COMPUTING (APRIL 2018)

PART II – CONTRACT CLAUSES

SECTION I – CONTRACT CLAUSES

I.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

I.2 FAR 52.216-18 ORDERING (OCT 1995)

I.3 FAR 52.216-19 ORDER LIMITATIONS (OCT 1995)

I.4 FAR 52.216-22 INDEFINITE QUANTITY (OCT 1995)

Page - 7

I.5 FAR 52.217-8 OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES (NOV 1999)

I.6 FAR 52.222-35 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS (OCT 2015)

I.7 FAR 52.222-36 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES

I.8 FAR 52.232-32 PERFORMANCE-BASED PAYMENTS (APR 2012)

I.9 FAR 52.247-67 SUBMISSION OF TRANSPORTATION DOCUMENTS FOR AUDIT .

(FEB 2006)

I.10 AIDAR 752.229-71 REPORTING OF FOREIGN TAXES (JUL 2007)

I.11 AIDAR 752.231-72 CONFERENCE PLANNING AND REQUIRED APPROVALS (

AUG 2013)

I.12 AIDAR 752.245-70 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY - USAID REPORTING

REQUIREMENTS (OCT 2017)

I.13 AIDAR 752.7013 - CONTRACTOR-MISSION RELATIONSHIPS

(M/OAA-DEV-AIDAR-18-04c) (JUN 2018)

I.14 AIDAR 752.7034 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DISCLAIMER

SECTION J – ATTACHMENTS

PART IV – REPRESENTATION AND INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION K – REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF

BIDDERS

K.1 NOTICE LISTING SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE

K.2 FAR 52.204-3 TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION (OCT 1998)

K.3 FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2020)

K.4 FAR 52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT

2015)

K.5 FAR 52.230-1 COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NOTICES AND

CERTIFICATION (OCT 2015)……………………………………………………………106

K.6 COMPLIANCE WITH VETERANS EMPLOYMENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. .

K.7 FAR 52.230-7 PROPOSAL DISCLOSURE – COST ACCOUNTING PRACTICE

CHANGES (APR 2005)

K.8 INSURANCE - IMMUNITY FROM TORT LIABILITY

K.9 AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS

K.10 AGREEMENT ON, OR EXCEPTIONS TO, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

K.11 SIGNATURE

Page - 8

K.12 FAR 52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT

2018)

K.13 FAR 52.203-18 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH ENTITIES THAT

REQUIRE CERTAIN INTERNAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS-

REPRESENTATION (JAN 2017)

K.14 FAR 52.222.56 CERTIFICATION REGARDING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS

COMPLIANCE PLAN

K.15 52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS

AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019)

SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFEROR

L.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ... 114

L.2 FAR 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

L.3 FAR 52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

L.4 AIDAR 752.252-1 AIDAR SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE (MAR 2015)

L.5 QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS

L.6 PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

L.7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

(see Section M.3.6)

L.8 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

L.9 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE COST/BUSINESS PROPOSAL

FOR TASK ORDER NO. 1

L.10 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE BRANDING

IMPLEMENTATION AND MARKING PLAN

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 NOTICE LISTING SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE

M.2 GENERAL INFORMATION

M.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

M.4 COST EVALUATION

M.5 DETERMINATION OF THE COMPETITIVE RANGE AND CONTRACT AWARD .. 138

M.6 CONTRACTING WITH SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN AND DISADVANTAGED

ENTERPRISES

M.7 BRANDING IMPLEMENTATION AND MARKING PLANS

Section B - Page - 9

PART I – THE SCHEDULE

SECTION B – SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND COST/PRICES

B.1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract is to provide technical assistance and services as described in detail in Section C, Statement of Work, for the implementation of the USAID/Indonesia Local Governance Enabling Environment (L-GEE) Activity. USAID Task Order Contracting Officers (TOCOs) will order services through the issuance of task orders during the ordering period as specified in Section F of the contract.

B.2 CONTRACT TYPE AND CONTRACT SERVICES

This is a single-holder IDIQ type contract. The Government will issue task orders that are either Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) (term or completion), Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF), Fixed-Priced or any combination thereof. The Contractor must perform the services set forth in task orders at prices consistent with the terms specified in this Contract.

B.3 MINIMUM OBLIGATED AMOUNT

This basic IDIQ contract will be awarded with the first task order, which will contain the minimum obligated amount for this IDIQ. As such, the IDIQ contract includes no initial obligation of funds.

Following the initial obligation, individual task orders will obligate funds to cover the work required under that task order.

B.4 MAXIMUM CONTRACT CEILING

This single award IDIQ contract has an overall ceiling price of $38,500,000 for the L-GEE Activity. The maximum aggregate dollar value of task orders must not exceed the Contract ceiling.

B.5 FIXED FEE CEILING (COST-PLUS-FIXED-FEE TASK ORDERS ONLY)

(a) The ceiling on fixed fee does not apply to Fixed-Priced Task Orders or other costs that have a separate fee ceiling established in the contract.

(b) For each cost-reimbursement task order issued under this IDIQ, the TOCO and Contractor agree to negotiate a set dollar amount for fixed fee. In negotiating the fixed dollar amount for fee, the TOCO must consider the policies and factors for establishing fee in FAR 15.404-4 as well as any applicable USAID policy on establishing a fixed fee amount. In no event, however, may the amount of fixed fee in any individual task order exceed [TBD AT TIME OF AWARD %] of the task order’s estimated cost, excluding fee. This fee ceiling is not applicable to Grants under Contracts (GUCs), if any, or other costs that have a separate fee ceiling established in the contract. The fixed fee ceiling applies to the prime contract and all cost reimbursement subcontracts.

Section B - Page - 10

(c) Fees for CPAF task order types will be negotiated by the TOCO at the time of task order award.

(d) The Total Estimated Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee for each Task Order must be negotiated in accordance with the terms of this IDIQ contract.

(e) Fixed Fee Payment. For any Task Order issued under this Contract, at the time of each payment of allowable costs to the Contractor, the USAID paying office ordinarily pays the Contractor a percentage of fixed fees that directly corresponds to the percentage of allowable costs being paid. Two exceptions to paying fixed fee in this manner apply:

(1) If the TOCO determines that this method results in paying a disproportionately higher ratio of fixed fee than the percentage of work that the contractor has completed, then the TOCO may suspend further payment of any fixed fee until the contractor has made sufficient progress to justify further payment, up to the agreed percentage.

(2) Because the clauses entitled "Allowable Cost and Payment" (FAR 52.216-7) and "Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) are incorporated into this Contract, the terms and conditions of these clauses apply after total payments of fixed fee reach eighty-five percent (85%) of the total fixed fee.

(f) Separate Fixed Fee Ceiling Application to Grants Under Contracts (GUCs).

(1) In no event may the amount of fixed fee (if any) applicable to GUCs in any individual task order exceed [TBD AT TIME OF AWARD%] of the task order GUC cost.

(2) In case of Letter of Credit issuance to the Contractor for GUC expenditures only, in no event may the amount of fixed fee (if any) applicable to GUCs in any individual task order exceed [TBD] of the task order GUC cost.

B.6 LABOR

(a) Only applicable to cost reimbursement type task orders.

(b) Central management costs will be handled through the following method:

(1) The Contracting Officer has determined that a key (full-time) technical manager is not necessary or required to administer the basic IDIQ. Contractors will not be authorized to bill USAID directly for IDIQ management costs under this IDIQ or under task orders, except as specified in Task Order No. 1. Contractors must propose a centralized management structure that allows for recovery of IDIQ management costs as part of its indirect costs.

(c) The work day and work week policies and method of accounting for paid absences including holidays for the contractor and major subcontractors must be in accordance with the Contractor’s organizational policies and acceptable accounting procedures

Section B - Page - 11 which should be compliant with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) cost principles and the terms of this contract.

(d) Compensation of personnel under this contract or any resulting subcontract must be in accordance with AIDAR 752.7007 Personnel Compensation (July 2007) and should be based upon a combination of factors including the prevailing compensation paid to personnel performing comparable work in the cooperating country and considerations of the individual’s work experience and education.

B.7 INDIRECT COSTS AND ADVANCED UNDERSTANDING ON CEILINGS

[RFP Note: Ceilings are not applicable to Small Business Offerors or local organizations serving as the prime or a subcontractor. Indirect rates are only applicable to cost reimbursement task orders.]

Pending establishment of revised provisional or final indirect cost rates, allowable indirect costs must be reimbursed on the basis of the following negotiated provisional or predetermined rates and the appropriate bases for prime contractors and their major subcontractors.

Offeror Fringe Rate

Overhead Rate %

Overhead Ceiling Rate %

G&A Rate %

G&A Ceiling Rate %

PRIME (Insert Name) Base of Application Source: (insert) Period: (insert)

SUBCONTRACTOR(S)

Name (s))

Base of Application Source: (insert) Period: (insert)

*Special Note: The un-shaded columns in the indirect cost table are the current approved indirect cost rates for the prime and major subcontractor(s).

The Contractor will make no change in its established method of classifying or allocating indirect costs that impacts this contract without the prior written approval of the Contracting Officer.

Reimbursement for indirect costs must be at final negotiated rates, but not in excess of ceiling rates specified above.

The Government must not be obligated to pay any additional amount associated with indirect costs above the ceiling rates established in the contract. This advance understanding must not change any monetary ceiling, cost limitation, or obligation established in the contract.

Section B - Page - 12

NOTE: For Fixed-priced Task Orders, the overhead ceilings serve as a basis for negotiation only.

Note: Contractors are allowed to recoup indirect costs (OH, G&A, etc.) as other direct costs if it is part of the contractor’s usual accounting procedures, consistent with FAR Part 31 and the contactor’s NICRA.

[END OF SECTION B]

Section C - Page - 13

SECTION C - STATEMENT OF WORK

C.1 TITLE OF ACTIVITY

USAID/Indonesia Local Governance Enabling Environment (L-GEE) Activity

C.2. PURPOSE, THEORY OF CHANGE, AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES

The goal of L-GEE is for the citizens of Indonesia to benefit from effective local government by increasing the quality of policy implementation and service delivery at the subnational level.

The activity will work at the national and subnational levels to achieve this goal through three interrelated intermediate results (IR):

IR 1: Coherence between national and subnational policies strengthened IR 2: Performance of local service delivery enhanced IR 3: Local budget allocation and execution improved

L-GEE’s Theory of Change is that if the linkages between policy, planning, performance, and budgeting are strengthened, so that national and subnational policies are aligned and planning and budgeting are grounded in accurate performance data, then subnational governments will serve their citizens effectively and with accountability. The Theory of Change assumes that the Government of Indonesia (GOI) continues to support decentralization as a key principle of democratic governance, that stakeholders at all levels engage in ongoing reform efforts, and that citizens increasingly exercise their rights to demand responsive government and receive quality public services.

Overall expected outcomes by the end of the performance of L-GEE Task Orders include:

● Institutionalized mechanisms for policy communication, coordination, and collaboration between and among various levels of government.

● Stronger policy clarity and implementation towards strengthening local governance and improving service delivery.

● More reliable and effective use of government data in planning, budgeting, and evaluating services and performance.

● Improved use of citizen input in planning, providing, and evaluating service delivery.

● Deeper responsiveness to gender equality and social inclusion in policy making, service provision, and resource decisions.

● Wider dissemination, adoption, and institutionalization of effective innovation, best practices, and replicable models for strengthening local governance and improving service delivery.

● Greater quality and transparency of spending at the subnational level.

C.3 ACTIVITY COMPONENTS via TASK ORDERS

L-GEE follows a Refine and Implement approach through the use of approximately three effectively timed task orders. During the lDIQ ordering period, USAID intends to strategically use specific, but essentially interrelated, task orders that will correspond with the following:

Section C - Page - 14

Component 1: Refine - As implemented via Task Order No. 1 (see Attachment 1), delivery of services will take place primarily during IDIQ Year One, to include political economy analyses and a co-design process that promotes Indonesian self-reliance by ensuring that the activity capitalizes on contextually responsive opportunities for reform where counterparts own and can sustain interventions and outcomes.

Component 2: Implement - Technical assistance and capacity-building support to national and subnational partners to address the needs and priorities identified in Task Order No. 1 will be provided in IDIQ Years Two through Five through separate task order(s).

In addition, L-GEE will include interrelated task order(s) that will correspond with:

Component 3: Short-term technical assistance (STTA) - The Contractor will be required to respond to USAID technical office requests to receive targeted technical assistance within L-GEE’s parameters to meet specific local governance-related needs that arise in the design or implementation of their own technical activities.

USAID may issue additional task orders for L-GEE to respond to unanticipated needs or initiatives that may arise at any time over the IDIQ period of performance.

C.4. CONTEXT/BACKGROUND

a. Background

In 1999, Indonesia embarked on an ambitious process of decentralization as part of wide sweeping reforms following the end of the Suharto regime. The country currently consists of 34 provinces (provinsi) divided into 514 regencies (kabupaten) and cities (kota), which are in turn subdivided into districts (kecamatan) and then further divided into subunits such as desa (villages) or kelurahan (urban communities). Decentralization’s ongoing evolution continues to be shaped through a series of laws, regulations, and revisions. This includes Law 25/2009 on Public Services, which defined local government responsibilities in the areas of education, employment and business, housing, communication and information, environment, health, social security, energy, banking, transportation, natural resources, tourism, and others. Foreign policy, defense, legal affairs, and monetary policy remain in the hands of the central government. The intermediary provincial level primarily serves as an extension of the central government, providing oversight and mediating on matters of overlapping jurisdiction at the district level, though Law 23/2014 also entrusted it with new authorities in areas such as coastal management, mining, and high school education.

In its first 20 years, decentralization has seen numerous successes, including an increase in access to basic services from 48.8 percent in 2001 to 70.9 in 2015. Annual evaluations by the Ministry of Home Affairs have found increasingly positive improvements, with 93 percent of local governments rated high or very high that same year.1 Individual locations have also been lauded for their improvements, from environmental management to the resettlement of street vendors.2 USAID, through activities such as Kinerja,3 has supported a range of positive

1 http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/657051513163708686/IEQ-Dec-2017-ENG.pdf.

2 https://profile.nus.edu.sg/fass/geotgb/bunnell%20et%20al%20prepublication.pdf.

3 For more on Kinerja, see https://oig.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/5-497-14-001-p_0.pdf, https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JZ25.pdf, https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KRBN.pdf, and https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MKSN.pdf.

http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/657051513163708686/IEQ-Dec-2017-ENG.pdf https://profile.nus.edu.sg/fass/geotgb/bunnell%20et%20al%20prepublication.pdf https://oig.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/5-497-14-001-p_0.pdf https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JZ25.pdf https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KRBN.pdf https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MKSN.pdf

Section C - Page - 15 changes in health, education, business licensing, and other areas, including service charters, customer satisfaction surveys, multi-stakeholder forums, and one-stop shops.

Despite achievements, effective local governance continues to face multiple challenges, including:

Lack of coherence between national and subnational policies: Uneven implementation of national-level policies at the subnational level has revealed a lack of clarity in the delineation of authorities between different levels of government and has resulted in inconsistencies in approach and impact. Poor harmonization has led to the cancellation of thousands of local-level regulations4 and increasing calls for deregulation, particularly in the name of economic development.5 Anecdotal input from subnational stakeholders suggests a wide range of challenges in meeting expectations for the implementation of national policies, including a desire for local contextualization, uncertainty over conflicting or rapidly changing national policies, and limited access to clear guidance on how to concretely operationalize technical directives. While platforms such as the Regional Leadership Coordination Forum (Forkopimda)6 do exist, there are no institutionalized mechanisms for follow-up. Instead, communication between the national and subnational levels often relies on either formal correspondence or informal meetings that are commonly ad hoc, one-way, and/or Jakarta-focused.

Disconnect between policy, planning, and performance: Key stages within the policy cycle operate in relative isolation from one another. Planning and budgeting are regulated by different laws, fall under the responsibility of different ministries, and take place at different times.7 This disconnect is reflected in the system for evaluating local government performance, which includes the Ministry of Home Affairs (MOHA) and its Evaluation of Local Government Implementation (EKPPD); the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reforms (KemenPAN-RB) and its Evaluation of Government Institution Performance Accountability System (SAKIP); the Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas), and its Regional Development Performance Evaluation (EKPD);

and the Ministry of Finance (MOF) and its Regional Finance Information System (SIKD). Each ministry requires a separate annual report, follows different requirements, measures different indicators, and establishes different ranks for top performers. Furthermore, disaggregated information from each of the reports remains unavailable, undermining the ability to use data to understand or address strengths or weaknesses in specific areas. Moreover, the results are insufficiently reincorporated back into the local level for use in planning, budgeting, staffing, or other decisions.

Low rates of budget utilization: Decentralization has resulted in a significant increase in spending at the subnational level, nearly doubling in real terms since the process first began.

By 2015, the World Bank estimated that subnational governments accounted for approximately 53% of government spending, including 38 percent at the district level and 15 percent at the provincial level. However, it also found that “additional spending per capita does not always commensurate with improvement in access to services, and at some point, increases in spending result in lower increases in access to services.”8 Stakeholder consultations indicate

4 https://www.abacademies.org/articles/some-key-issues-in-the-cancellation-of-local-regulations-in-indonesia-7948.html, https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2018/15/shsconf_icolgas2018_01005.pdf 5 https://jakartaglobe.id/business/for-every-new-regulation-cull-ten-jokowi-tells-ministers-and-regional-heads.

6 https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JKP/article/download/2169/1312/.

7 For an in-depth discussion, see: https://www.ksi-indonesia.org/file_upload/Critical-Study-on-Development-Planning-and-Budgeti-06Feb2018150821.pdf.

8 http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/657051513163708686/IEQ-Dec-2017-ENG.pdf.

https://www.abacademies.org/articles/some-key-issues-in-the-cancellation-of-local-regulations-in-indonesia-7948.html https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2018/15/shsconf_icolgas2018_01005.pdf https://jakartaglobe.id/business/for-every-new-regulation-cull-ten-jokowi-tells-ministers-and-regional-heads https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JKP/article/download/2169/1312/ https://www.ksi-indonesia.org/file_upload/Critical-Study-on-Development-Planning-and-Budgeti-06Feb2018150821.pdf https://www.ksi-indonesia.org/file_upload/Critical-Study-on-Development-Planning-and-Budgeti-06Feb2018150821.pdf http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/657051513163708686/IEQ-Dec-2017-ENG.pdf

Section C - Page - 16 that the size of subnational budgets is not necessarily the key barrier to quality service provision, but rather the opaqueness of the budget process (including a lack of access to public information), a low rate of absorption (in part due to the late arrival of funding, condensed timelines, inadequate planning, and procurement challenges), a tendency towards cut-and-paste forecasting, and vulnerability to rent-seeking behaviors. Tying incentives and disincentives to fiscal transfers increasingly appears an inadequate approach to encouraging performance, rewarding districts that already benefit from higher capacity and penalizing those that continue to struggle.

Persistent inequalities: Indonesia’s rich diversity includes hundreds of ethnic groups, a wide variety of religious practices, and a growing youth segment dispersed throughout a distinct archipelago landscape. This diversity, however, also includes disparate experiences in the ability of various communities to participate in local governance processes and benefit from both access to and the quality of public services. Such exclusion takes various forms, resulting from geographical remoteness, societal prejudices, institutional discrimination, and/or patriarchal traditions; affecting groups as varied as people living in poverty, people living with HIV/AIDS, migrant workers, prisoners, and the elderly; and impacting issues such as legal documentation, vulnerability to violence, and the prospects for health, education, and employment. Inclusion efforts, however, commonly remain limited, with a tendency towards “box-checking” requirements rather than a nuanced understanding of the challenges, conceptualization of the variety of affected communities, or substantive measures to ensure equitable outcomes. For example, while candidacy quotas have helped women to make leadership gains, their numbers in government remain relatively low: only 92 women serve as either a mayor, regent, or governor out of a total of 548 provinces, districts, and cities, with only one elected as governor.

Groups that fall outside the common understanding of social inclusion, such as members of the LGBTI community, face even greater vulnerabilities, particularly when combined with layered exclusion not just from public participation, but from society and often families.

Unsustainable results: Shortcomings notwithstanding, good practices do exist. There are both numerous awards to recognize champions as well as efforts to document and disseminate new ideas.9 The success of such initiatives, however, remains limited, often dependent on the personalities of individual leaders, and commonly overturned when new officials assume power.

There is little in place to institutionalize achievements and thus sustain, scale, or replicate them.

Furthermore, stakeholder consultations reveal misunderstandings about the purpose of and potential for creative solutions, including a tendency to pursue innovation for its high-profile benefit, rather than its appropriateness or effectiveness in addressing needs or challenges.

There is high political interest in the Smart Cities movement, for example, but inconsistent understanding of how technology can and should improve service provision and good governance and where its limitations (e.g., for marginalized communities) or liabilities (e.g., for data protection and privacy) may lie. At the same time, many stakeholders express reluctance to take risks in their leadership, fearing that deviating from conventional approaches leaves them vulnerable to investigation for perceived financial impropriety.

The L-GEE activity responds to these challenges. It does so, however, in a highly fluid environment, which includes the GOI’s new national mid-term development plan, a new USAID

9 See, for example, the Innovative Government Award by the Ministry of Home Affairs (http://indeks.inovasi.otda.go.id/layanan/), the Information System for Public Service Innovation by the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic reform. (https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/kementerian-panrb-tetapkan-top-40-inovasi-pelayanan-publik-2018), the Village Innovation Documentation System (https://inovasidesa.kemendesa.go.id/), and the provincial knowledge hubs supported by the GIZ-funded TRANSFORMASI (http://jipp.sulselprov.go.id/, http://jipp.sumselprov.go.id/, https://jipp.jatimprov.go.id/).

http://indeks.inovasi.otda.go.id/layanan/ https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/kementerian-panrb-tetapkan-top-40-inovasi-pelayanan-publik-2018 https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/kementerian-panrb-tetapkan-top-40-inovasi-pelayanan-publik-2018 https://inovasidesa.kemendesa.go.id/ http://jipp.sulselprov.go.id/ http://jipp.sumselprov.go.id/ https://jipp.jatimprov.go.id/

Section C - Page - 17

Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS), and the anticipated end of several relevant donor-funded efforts. The second term of Indonesian president Joko Widodo (Jokowi), which began in October 2019, has also ushered in a number of new and proposed initiatives, including potential changes to the powers and authorities of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the introduction of various omnibus laws, the reduction of two echelons of civil servants, and discussions on the cancellation of direct elections for provincial leaders.

Separately, elections in more than 200 cities/districts have been expected in 2020, in an environment in which governmental offices already experience unusually high turnover. Lastly, Indonesia faces numerous potential risks, including vulnerabilities to a global economic slowdown, political backsliding, religious extremism, growing cultural intolerance, social unrest, frequent natural disasters, and public health outbreaks. All of these factors require sensitivity and flexibility, including a do-no-harm approach that ensures the activity does not inadvertently contribute to potential tensions.

b. Relationship to USAID’s Strategy and Other Priorities

L-GEE builds on previous USAID efforts to advance local governance and improve public service delivery in Indonesia, including the Local Government Support Program (LGSP, 2005- 2009) and the Kinerja Local Governance Service Improvement Program (2010-2016). It also complements current USAID investments supporting accountability as well as civil society. The activity particularly incorporates lessons learned by Kinerja that sustainability requires several key factors, including local government commitment, support by local champions, the complementarity of local regulations with the national regulatory framework, and alignment with national policies and programs.

These lessons resonate with USAID’s support for Indonesia’s journey to self-reliance (J2SR) by building the country’s capacity to plan, finance, and implement solutions to local development challenges and strengthening the GOI’s ability to see those solutions through effectively, inclusively, and with accountability. L-GEE’s strong focus on J2SR encourages local stakeholders to determine their own priorities for strengthening local governance and service delivery and ensures that stakeholders remain actively engaged throughout the activity’s design, implementation, monitoring, evaluation, and learning. The approach reflects USAID’s shift to serving as a strategic advisor to the GOI, with a primary role as a facilitator that supports local ownership, innovation, replication, and sustainability. This includes support for private sector engagement and identifying potential roles for market-based solutions.

Under USAID/Indonesia’s CDCS for 2014-2020, L-GEE falls under the Development Objective of Democratic Governance and Security Strengthened and responds to cross-cutting themes of governance at all levels; private sector engagement and partnerships; science, technology, and innovation; civil society and non-governmental organizations; and poor and vulnerable populations, with a focus on gender equality. Throughout implementation, L-GEE will utilize a flexible mechanism that can nimbly respond to priorities emerging from the new CDCS. This will require close coordination with USAID/Indonesia technical offices to ensure that activity outcomes contribute to the impact of other USAID investments.

Furthermore, the L-GEE activity aligns with the governance pillar of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Vision (IPV) and the IPV objective of Strengthening Governance Systems, including alignment with the Indo-Pacific Transparency Initiative (IPTI). Specifically, the activity will contribute to Goal 1 of IPTI, Institutional and Fiscal Integrity Strengthened, by ensuring that public resources are used for public benefit; increasing transparency and accountability across policy, planning, budgeting, and execution; modernizing legal and regulatory standards in line with international best

Section C - Page - 18 practices; and enhancing access to information on public resource decision-making and expenditure. The activity will also contribute to IPTI Goal 2, Political and Electoral System Integrity Strengthened, by addressing government institutions’ capacity and commitment to enable public participation.

In addition, the L-GEE activity contributes to GOI national policies and programs, such as the Long-Term National Development Plan (RPJPN) (2005-2025) and the National Mid-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) (2020-2024). In particular, the activity will contribute to the RPJPN objectives of “(a) supporting coordination among development actors in the attainment of the national goal, (b) ensuring the created integration, synchronization and synergy among regions, among spatial units, between time, among functions of the Government as well as between the Central and Regional Governments, (c) ensuring linkage and consistency among planning, budgeting, implementation and supervision, (d) ensuring the realization of the efficient, effective, just and sustainable use of funding resources, and (e) optimizing community participation.” Under the RPJMN (2020-2024), the activity will contribute to the goal to Develop Regions for Reducing Inequality and Ensuring Equity as well as the goal to Strengthen Stability of Politics, Law, Defence and Security and Public Services Transformation. The activity also aligns with priorities established by President Jokowi at the beginning of his second term in office, specifically bureaucracy reform, human capacity, and budget efficiency.

Indonesia has committed to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and has incorporated SDG targets into its mid-term development plan. Regulations such as Presidential Decree number 59/2017 have established related national mechanisms and have mandated the integration of SDG goals, targets, and indicators into subnational mid-term development plans. L-GEE aligns with a number of SDG targets and indicators, particularly target 16.6 (Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels), and indicator 16.6.2 (Proportion of the population satisfied with their last experience of public services), as well as others such as target 16.7(Responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels), and indicator 16.10.2 (Public access to information). In supporting public services (and reflecting the integrated nature of the SDGs), the activity may also contribute to Goal 3 (Health and well-being); Goal 6 (Water and sanitation);

Goal 8 (Economic development); and Goal 11 (Sustainability and resilience), among others.

C.5. GEOGRAPHIC TARGETING

USAID envisions that L-GEE will be implemented in up to six provinces, currently expected to include East Java, East Kalimantan, Banten, South Sulawesi, East Nusa Tenggara, and/or West Kalimantan. It may potentially work in additional provinces, including but not limited to, North Sumatra, West Java, Central Java, the Special Region (Daerah Istimewa, or DI) of Yogyakarta, Central Sulawesi, Central Kalimantan, North Maluku, Maluku, and Papua.

Final selection of the targeted provinces, including their number, and further selection of targeted districts, will be based on 1) finalization of the Mission’s new CDCS; 2) political economy analyses (PEAs) in Year One of the activity; and 3) co-design efforts following completion of the PEAs. Considerations for geographic targeting will include the following:

● Opportunities to maximize other USAID investments, particularly within the Health and Environment portfolios, including the possibilities for co-location.

● Opportunities to leverage USAID investments from other portfolios (Human Capacity and Partnerships and Democratic Resilience and Governance), including activities supporting civil society strengthening and private sector engagement.

Section C - Page - 19

● GOI recommendations.

● Capacity and commitment of the district government to cooperate, including rankings in existing governance indicators.10

● Coordination with other donors, such as the World Bank, the Australian Government’s

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), and the German Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).

● Status of district leaders in the election cycle, with preference for districts that have recently completed elections, rather than those in which elections are anticipated in the near future.

The L-GEE activity must work in a mix of “leading” (higher capacity/commitment) and “emerging” (lower capacity/commitment) areas, with approximately one leading district per province and approximately four emerging districts per province (two medium and two low), for an estimated total of 30.

C.6. ACTIVITY TASK ORDERS

C.6.1. Introduction of Task Order Components

The Contractor is expected to provide a variety of tasks/services under each of the components described below covering various technical areas to address USAID/Indonesia’s strategic development objectives described in C.2. USAID reserves the right to order other tasks/services related to the IDIQ Contract components that are not explicitly stated below.

The L-GEE activity is anticipated, at a minimum, to be implemented via the three components described below, and performed as individual Task Orders:

Component 1: Refine will take place in Year One and is foreseen to comprise approximately 15% of the level of effort for the overall activity. Component 1 consists of PEA and co-design at the national and subnational levels, to ensure that the activity remains contextually grounded, responds to local needs as defined by Indonesian actors, and supports long-term ownership and sustainability. The PEA and co-design will culminate in life-of-activity implementation plans at the national and subnational level, including identification of the targeted districts and the tailored technical interventions and methodologies for achieving L-GEE’s intermediate results and expected outcomes, to be implemented via a separate task order(s).

Component 2: Implement will take place in Years Two through Five and is foreseen to comprise approximately 75% of the level of effort for the overall L-GEE Activity, implemented via a task order(s). Component 2 implements the plans emerging from Component 1 and will provide dedicated technical assistance to national, provincial, and district partners to strengthen policy coherence, enhance local service delivery, and improve local budget allocation and execution.

This includes a particular focus on ensuring that outcomes will be locally owned and sustained following the end of the activity.

Component 3: On-demand STTA will be implemented via a dedicated task order for USAID/Indonesia technical offices, such as Health or Environment, to request specific and

10 For example, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) Regional Government Performance Evaluation (EKPPD); the Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) and Innovation in Public Service Awards of the Ministry of State Administrative and Bureaucratic Reforms (KemenPAN-RB); reports from the Corruption Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, or KPK); Financial Report audits by the State Audit Agency (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, BPK); Bappenas’ Indonesian Democracy Index; and indicators under MSS and the SDGs.

Section C - Page - 20 targeted L-GEE assistance to support the design and/or implementation of other…