L-3 PPDS Amendment 03.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 0003: Firefighting Training Structures and Props (FTSP) Maintenance and Training Services
- Solicitation number
- N6134023R006803
About this file
This document is an Excel spreadsheet template for offerors to provide past performance references relevant to Solicitation Number N6134023R006803 from the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command for Firefighting Training Structures and Props (FTSP) Maintenance and Training Services. The template requires offerors to provide details of up to three past or current contracts demonstrating experience with operations and maintenance of Mobile Aircraft Firefighter Training Devices, including total contract value, period of performance, number of sites supported, whether the work involved depot-level maintenance or was performed overseas. Notes indicate the evaluators will only consider references specifically involving maintenance of Mobile Aircraft Firefighter Training Devices and that offerors must provide page and paragraph references to substantiate how each past performance meets the scope, magnitude and complexity of this solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP amendment 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment L-1 Questions and Answers Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| Attachment L-4 IDIQ Pricing Worksheet (1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FTSP PWSREV3_230911.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| *COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS ATTACHMENT IN ITS ORIGINAL MICROSOFT EXCEL FORMAT* | |
| The Government does not want to receive, and the Government will not consider, an offeror’s explanation or description of the alleged past performance effort or what the offeror allegedly performed under a past performance contract. Therefore, please only complete the requested information below, and do not make changes to any embedded formulas. | |
| Contract Reference 1 | |
| Administrative Data | |
| Offeror Name | |
| Contract Name | |
| Contract Number | |
| Task Order Number | |
| Contract Type | |
| Offeror Role (Prime/Sub) | |
| CAGE Code | |
| DUNS Code | |
| PoP Start (mm/dd/yyyy) | |
| PoP End (mm/dd/yyyy) | |
| Days of PoP | 0 |
| Number of CPARS Provided | |
| Number of PPQs Provided | |
| Point of Contact Information | |
| Customer | |
| Contracting Agency | |
| Government Contracting Officer | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Government Program Manager | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Government Contracting Officer's Representative | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Scope of the Effort | |
| Operations and Maintenance of Mobile Aircraft Firefighter Training Devices (MAFTDs)* (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| *Note 1: In accordance with the Section M definition of Not Relevant, past performance contract references that do not include Operations and Maintenance of Mobile Aircraft Firefighter Training Devices (MAFTDs) as described by Appendix COMS-01 MAFTD will be rated Not Relevant with no opportunity to submit a replacement. | |
| Magnitude of the Effort | |
| Total Contract Dollar Value (TCDV) | |
| Annualized Value (TCDV/days of PoP*365) | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Complexity of the Effort | |
| Number of Sites | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| Depot-Level Maintenance (as described by PWS Para. 4.6.2) (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| Performed OCONUS Work (excluding U.S. territories) (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| **Note 2: In accordance with RFP Section L, Part B, Paragraph 1.2 Relevant Contract Data, if an Attachment L-3 element is not filled out completely with a description and SOW/PWS pinpoint references (page and paragraph number), or is marked N/A, then evaluators will assess that the contract reference did not demonstrate similarity in that element of the relevancy evaluation. The Government will review the pages and paragraphs that the offeror cites in Attachment L-3 to assess similarity to the Scope, Magnitude, and Complexity of the instant solicitation. Should the Government identify information within the substantiating documents that is not specifically referenced by the offeror, the Government may utilize the information as part of its relevancy evaluation. However, the Government is not obligated to search for information in order to cure the offeror’s proposal. | |
| Contract Reference 2 | |
| Administrative Data | |
| Offeror Name | |
| Contract Name | |
| Contract Number | |
| Task Order Number | |
| Contract Type | |
| Offeror Role (Prime/Sub) | |
| CAGE Code | |
| DUNS Code | |
| PoP Start (mm/dd/yyyy) | |
| PoP End (mm/dd/yyyy) | |
| Days of PoP | 0 |
| Number of CPARS Provided | |
| Number of PPQs Provided | |
| Point of Contact Information | |
| Customer | |
| Contracting Agency | |
| Government Contracting Officer | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Government Program Manager | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Government Contracting Officer's Representative | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Scope of the Effort | |
| Operations and Maintenance of Mobile Aircraft Firefighter Training Devices (MAFTDs)* (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| *Note 1: In accordance with the Section M definition of Not Relevant, past performance contract references that do not include Operations and Maintenance of Mobile Aircraft Firefighter Training Devices (MAFTDs) as described by Appendix COMS-01 MAFTD will be rated Not Relevant with no opportunity to submit a replacement. | |
| Magnitude of the Effort | |
| Total Contract Dollar Value (TCDV) | |
| Annualized Value (TCDV/days of PoP*365) | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Complexity of the Effort | |
| Number of Sites | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| Depot-Level Maintenance (as described by PWS Para. 4.6.2) (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| Performed OCONUS Work (excluding U.S. territories) (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| **Note 2: In accordance with RFP Section L, Part B, Paragraph 1.2 Relevant Contract Data, if an Attachment L-3 element is not filled out completely with a description and SOW/PWS pinpoint references (page and paragraph number), or is marked N/A, then evaluators will assess that the contract reference did not demonstrate similarity in that element of the relevancy evaluation. The Government will review the pages and paragraphs that the offeror cites in Attachment L-3 to assess similarity to the Scope, Magnitude, and Complexity of the instant solicitation. Should the Government identify information within the substantiating documents that is not specifically referenced by the offeror, the Government may utilize the information as part of its relevancy evaluation. However, the Government is not obligated to search for information in order to cure the offeror’s proposal. | |
| Contract Reference 3 | |
| Administrative Data | |
| Offeror Name | |
| Contract Name | |
| Contract Number | |
| Task Order Number | |
| Contract Type | |
| Offeror Role (Prime/Sub) | |
| CAGE Code | |
| DUNS Code | |
| PoP Start (mm/dd/yyyy) | |
| PoP End (mm/dd/yyyy) | |
| Days of PoP | 0 |
| Number of CPARS Provided | |
| Number of PPQs Provided | |
| Point of Contact Information | |
| Customer | |
| Contracting Agency | |
| Government Contracting Officer | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Government Program Manager | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Government Contracting Officer's Representative | |
| Phone Number | |
| Government Email | |
| Scope of the Effort | |
| Operations and Maintenance of Mobile Aircraft Firefighter Training Devices (MAFTDs)* (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| *Note 1: In accordance with the Section M definition of Not Relevant, past performance contract references that do not include Operations and Maintenance of Mobile Aircraft Firefighter Training Devices (MAFTDs) as described by Appendix COMS-01 MAFTD will be rated Not Relevant with no opportunity to submit a replacement. | |
| Magnitude of the Effort | |
| Total Contract Dollar Value (TCDV) | |
| Annualized Value (TCDV/days of PoP*365) | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Complexity of the Effort | |
| Number of Sites | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| Depot-Level Maintenance (as described by PWS Para. 4.6.2) (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| Performed OCONUS Work (excluding U.S. territories) (Yes/No) | |
| Pinpoint References (Document Name, Page, & Paragraph #)** | |
| **Note 2: In accordance with RFP Section L, Part B, Paragraph 1.2 Relevant Contract Data, if an Attachment L-3 element is not filled out completely with a description and SOW/PWS pinpoint references (page and paragraph number), or is marked N/A, then evaluators will assess that the contract reference did not demonstrate similarity in that element of the relevancy evaluation. The Government will review the pages and paragraphs that the offeror cites in Attachment L-3 to assess similarity to the Scope, Magnitude, and Complexity of the instant solicitation. Should the Government identify information within the substantiating documents that is not specifically referenced by the offeror, the Government may utilize the information as part of its relevancy evaluation. However, the Government is not obligated to search for information in order to cure the offeror’s proposal. |
N6134023R0068 Attachment L-3 Past Performance Data Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .