J.1.6 Power Africa MEL Plan Result Framework.pdf

Power Africa Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan

Date: May 30, 2022

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan2

Contents

List Of Figures And Tables

Acronyms 3

Introduction 6 Purpose 6 Objectives 7 Guiding Principles 7 Performance Monitoring Plan 8 Results Framework 8 Data Quality Assessment (DQA) Procedures 24 Evaluation Plan 24

Roles and Responsibilities 26 Data Collection 27 Standard Operating procedure (SOP) for MegaWatts Reporting 28 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Counting and Verifying Connections Data 28 ANNEX I – Performance Indicator Reference Sheets 29 ANNEX II – Evaluation Plan 86 ANNEX III – Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting Plan 91

ANNEX IV

ANNEX V – Data Quality Assessment Worksheet 96

Figure 1. Power Africa Results Framework 10 Table 1. Performance Indicators Associated with Intermediate Results 11 Table 2. Performance Indicator Summary Table 14

Table 4. Evaluation Timeline 86

Table 6. CLA Activities Summary 93

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan3

Acronyms

ADS Automated Directive System ALSF African Legal Support Facility AM Activity Manager

BTG Beyond the Grid

CE Clean Energy CCIR Cross-cutting Intermediate Result CLDP Commercial Legal Development Program CLEER Clean Energy Emission Reduction CO2 Carbon Dioxide CO2e Carbon Dioxide-Equivalent COD Commercial Operations Date

DFC Development Finance Corporation DO Development Objective DOC Department of Commerce DOE Department of Energy DPs Development Partners DQA Data Quality Assessment

EAEP East Africa Energy Program EAPP East Africa Power Pool EAGP East Africa Geothermal Partnership EPC Engineering/Procurement/Construction ESS Energy Storage System EX-IM Export-Import Bank of the United States

FAA Foreign Assistance Act FC Financial Close FY Fiscal Year

GHG Greenhouse Gas GLI Gender Lens Investing

GWP Global Warming Potential

IMs Implementing Mechanisms IPs Implementing Partners IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change kV Kilovolt M&E Monitoring & Evaluation MAIFI Momentary Average Interruption Frequency Index MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation MEL Monitoring Evaluation & Learning MOU Memorandum of Understanding MWh Megawatt-hour MW Megawatt

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan4

N2O Nitrous Oxide NARUC National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners NGO Non-Governmental Organization NPSP Nigeria Power Sector Program

OPIC Overseas Private Investment Corporation OU Operating Unit

PAAP Powering African Agriculture Program PAIS Power Africa Information System

PA-SAG Power Africa Senior Advisors Group PATT Power Africa Tracking Tool PAYGO Pay As You Go PFAN Private Financing Advisory Network PIRS Performance Indicators Reference Sheet POC Point of Contact PPA Power Purchase Agreement

PPR Performance Plan and Report PSP Private Sector Partner PV Photovoltaic

RM Relationship Manager

SAEP Southern Africa Energy Program SAPP Southern Africa Power Pool SAG Senior Advisors Group SAIDI System Average Interruption Duration Index SAIFI System Average Interruption Frequency Index SEAM Scaling Energy Access Markets in Africa SEFA Sustainable Energy Fund for Africa SOP Standard Operating Procedures SSA Sub-Saharan Africa

TA Transaction Advisor tCO2e Tons of Carbon Dioxide-Equivalent USADF United States African Development Foundation USAID United States Agency for International Development USEA United States Energy Association USAS Unlocking Southern Africa Solar USG United States Government USTDA United States Trade and Development Agency

WAEP West Africa Energy Program WAPP West Africa Power Pool WB World Bank WRI World Resources Institute

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan5

Access grid product or system

Clean Energy Power generated from the following renewable resources: wind, tidal, solar, geothermal, hydro, biomass, biogas and green hydrogen

Commissioned

The state of an engineering project designed to increase electricity access having been installed and tested; having fully trained operations, maintenance, and management deemed ready for service

Commissioning The process of ensuring that systems are designed, installed, functionally tested, and capable of being operated (General Administration, State of Washington)

Conditions Precedent An event which must occur, unless its non-occurrence is excused, before performance under a contract becomes due, i.e., before any contractual duty exists (Restatement (Second of the Law of Contracts 1981)

Development Objective

The most ambitious result of an initiative, implemented through the U.S.

accountable to demonstrate impact

Development Partner A bilateral or multilateral institution or technical agency with a mandate to pursue activities that support development objectives and partner with Power Africa

Financial Close

Achieved when each of the conditions precedent to the initial drawdown of funds or waived by the project lender(s) (The Law and Business of International Project a grace period equal to the construction period plus a repayment period of at least 10 years on reasonable terms and conditions

Greenhouse Gas gas responsible for anthropogenic climate

Megawatt A unit of power equal to one million watts; measure of the output of a power station

Megawatt-Hour A unit of energy, especially electrical energy, equal to the work done by one watt acting for one hour and equivalent to 3,600 joules

Mini-grid or Micro-grid kilowatts to one megawatt) that serves a limited number of consumers via a distribution grid that can operate in isolation from, or in conjunction with, national electricity transmission networks (The preferred term for Power Africa usage is mini-grid.)

Metro-grid Larger type of mini-grid, typically in the megawatt scale, that serve a densely populated urban area

Transaction

Utility scale In comparison to a mini-grid and metro-grid, an electrical plant operating in the hundreds of megawatt scale that can serve multiple geographic areas, often requiring a transmission infrastructure

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan6

Introduction

Power Africa is an innovative, private-sector-led initiative aimed at doubling electricity access in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), generation capacity by 30,000 megawatts (MW) and increase electricity access by at least 60 million household and business

$40 billion in power projects across the continent.

To meet these goals, Power Africa developed a strategic document known as the Power Africa Roadmap1 to show how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and other U.S. Government (USG) agencies, in partnership with the private sector, donors, and host country governments, would increase access to electricity. In 2018, Power Africa revisited this roadmap and introduced a revised strategy known as Power Africa 2.0.2. While maintaining focus on supply partners (PSPs) on where Power Africa could utilize its comparative advantage to have the greatest impact.

accelerating a carbon-free future, and increasing investment and innovation in the energy sector. Power Africa-sponsored interventions will continue to strengthen African energy regulatory frameworks, empower African energy institutions, and advance sustainable development across sub-Saharan Africa.

performance management tasks which will assess progress towards its three development objectives: 1) ending energy poverty; 2) accelerating a carbon-free future; and 3) bolstering competitive private-sector investment and innovation in the

This MEL Plan is forward looking and is applicable for new activity design and implementation. It does not apply retroactively to activities already under implementation.

appropriate targets, baselines, and data collection and analysis. This includes the following:

1. Revised Results Framework and associated narrative;

2. Performance monitoring plan, which includes indicators and their application;

3. Performance indicator reference sheets (PIRS), which provide further details and references on the components and applications of each indicator;

4. Data quality assessment (DQA) standards and procedures for maintaining data quality;

Evaluation plan to plan for and track activity performance evaluations; and 6.

The MEL Plan is intended to be a living document that provides the basis for continuous assessment and learning about

Purpose The Power Africa MEL Plan establishes the foundation for monitoring and evaluating the results of the initiative and presents approaches to learning that enable decision-makers to adapt program implementation based on knowledge and evidence.

Performance monitoring of all project activities will be done in accordance with the USAID monitoring and evaluation policy outlined in Automated Directive System (ADS) 201. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) activities provide evidence that

1. Power Africa RoadMap (https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/powerafrica/roadmap)

2. Power Africa 2.0 ( )

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan7

Objectives The MEL Plan objectives include the following:

• Provide guidelines for data collection, management, and reporting to ensure that high-quality data is collected and

• Regularly track partner progress against targets;

• Standardize MEL methodologies and tools across Power Africa-sponsored project portfolio so that meaningful performance comparisons can be made over time; and

• Facilitate learning, knowledge management, and sharing of crucial lessons to inform current and future projects.

Guiding Principles The Power Africa MEL Plan sets a high bar in terms of quality, consistency, and useability of data collected, as well as subsequent learning activities. The plan is underpinned by four guiding principles:

Data is reliable and high quality:

Assessment Procedures section). Adherence to these data standards by both Power Africa and partners is enabled through the provision of monitoring and evaluation capacity-building, standard monitoring and reporting

Activities and Partners are Accountable and Transparent: Power Africa MEL systems will ensure that all projects, activities, and partnerships meet their obligations in a manner that is transparent to USAID, local appropriately shared.

Data Collection and Monitoring is Performed Ethically: Monitoring and evaluation processes will

Learning is Prioritized and Facilitated: Intentional learning will be facilitated and promoted through ongoing monitoring, portfolio reviews, evaluations, documentation and use of lessons learned, and other activities (see the Collaboration, Learning and Adapting Plan under Annex III).

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan8

Performance Monitoring Plan the updated Power Africa Performance Monitoring Plan, which includes (i) the current Power Africa Results Framework and associated narrative, (ii) an overall monitoring plan, inclusive of all core indicators cross-referenced to the results

Results Framework The goal of Power Africa is to advance sub-Saharan African development through universal access to clean energy. It seeks to achieve this goal through a multi-faceted approach that includes on-the-ground activities that provide technical assistance explicit focus on supporting and facilitating energy-sector transactions.

and businesses; expand access to rural and marginalized communities; promote clean energy operations; and support utility

To accelerate a carbon-free future, Power Africa activities will seek to decarbonize the electricity sector, support a just interconnection and cross-border power trade to deliver more clean energy to end users.

To achieve its ambitious goal, Power Africa works through three development objectives (DO), illustrated within the Power Africa Results Framework (Figure 1 below): 1) Ending energy poverty; 2) Accelerating a carbon-free future; and 3) Bolstering competitive private-sector investment and innovation in the energy sector. It should be noted that portions of this strategy (such as IR 3.1 – increased exports of U.S. clean energy goods and services in Africa) are anticipated for achievement by the broader Power Africa partnership (beyond simply USAID-funded activities), including partners within the interagency, private-sector, and donor community. The strategy will also prioritize implementation of USG gender equality-related initiatives, strategies, and policies to strengthen gender equality and female empowerment across all interventions. The its Results Framework to inform all functions of its MEL approach, which includes the selection of appropriate indicators, pinpointing learning needs, and targeting resources for MEL actions.

An Interagency Approach by law. Given this, the Power Africa Results Framework includes development objectives and intermediate results that are supported, and at times led, by interagency partners. These areas include the following:

IR 2.2: National and Regional Planning for Just Clean Energy Transitions Supported:

regional engagements on clean energy transitions are being led, or supported, by interagency partners with a strong foreign policy and/or trade relationship, given the criticality of our bilateral relationships to achieve energy transition goals. This includes the leadership of the Department of State, as well as support from the Development Finance Corporation (DFC), Department of Energy (DOE), and others.

DO 3: Bolstering competitive private-sector investment and innovation in the energy sector: Improving the investment in climate and enabling environment requires a broad suite of support and capacity-building. Such support ranges beyond USAID, including the DFC, U.S. Trade and Development Agency (USTDA) , the Departments of Treasury and Commerce, and others.

IR 3.1: Increased Exports of U.S. Clean Energy Goods and Services in Africa: While USAID remains the coordinator supported, and at times led, by the Department of Commerce, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex- Im), USTDA, and others that have a broader domestic-international mandate.

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan9

IR 3.3 Increased Investment in and Utilization of Advanced Energy Technologies: Similar to IR 3.1, improving the relationships and connections between African and U.S. industries and companies is critical to increasing African access to advanced and clean technologies and expanded investment within this sector. Related activities are supported, and at times led, by USG agencies that have strong domestic mandates and relationships, such as DOE, USTDA, and others.

P ow er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

A dv an ci ng s ub -S ah ar an A fr ic an d ev el op m en t t hr ou gh u ni ve rs al a cc es s to c le an e ne rg y

G O

A L

IR

.1

Im pr ov ed e ne rg y ac ce ss fo r ho us eh ol ds

IR

.2

In cr ea se d cl ea n en er gy fo r he al th a nd b as ic h um an s er vi ce s

IR

.3

In cr ea se d bu sin es s an d em pl oy m en t op po rt un iti es , p ar tic ul ar ly fo r w om en

, b y im pr ov ed a cc es s to e ne rg y

D O

3:

B ol st er in g co m pe tit iv e pr iv at e se ct or in ve st m en t an d in no va tio n in th e en er gy s ec to r

IR

.1

In cr ea se d cl ea n en er gy g en er at io n to r ed uc e cu rr en t a nd fu tu re c ar bo n em iss io ns

IR

.2

Su pp or te d na tio na l a nd re gi on al p la nn in g fo r ju st c le an en er gy tr an sit io n

IR

.1

In cr ea se d ex po rt s of

U .S

. c le an en er gy g oo ds a nd s er vi ce s in A fr ic a

IR

.2

St re ng th en ed e na bl in g en vi ro nm en t fo r cl ea n en er gy in ve st m en t

IR

.3

In cr ea se d in ve st m en t i n an d ut iliz at io of ad va nc ed e ne rg y te ch no lo gi es

IR

.4

En co ur ag ed s oc ia lly in cl us iv e a nd e nv iro nm en ta lly r es po ns ib gy in ve st m en t

D O

2:

A cc el er at in g a ca rb on

-f re e fu tu re

IR

.4

Im pr ov ed e ne rg y ac ce ss fo r m ar gi na liz ed p op ul at io ns

D O

1:

E nd in g en er gy p ov er ty

C C

IR

St re ng th ed d ex pa gr id s, d el iv er in g m or e po w er t o en d us er s

Fi gu re

Po w er

A fri ca R es ul ts F ra m ew or k er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

Pe rf or m an ce

M on ito ri ng P la n pu rp os e, a nd m et ho do lo gy fo r ea ch in di ca to r, an d a pe rf or m an ce t ra ck in g ta bl e to b e up da te d re gu la rly w ith b as el in e va lu es , t ar ge ts , a nd a ct ua l a ch ie ve m en ts

R ep or tin g on t he se di ca to rs w ill be p re sc rib ed b y th e gu id el in es d et ai le d in e ac h

PI

R S

(f ou nd in

A nn ex I)

Ta bl e be lo w il lu st ra te s th e al ig nm en t b et w ee n

Po w er A fr ic a in te rm ed ia te r es ul ts a nd p er fo rm an ce in di ca to rs

Ta bl e 1.

P er fo rm an ce

In di ca to rs A ss oc ia te d w ith In te rm ed ia te R es ul ts

In te rm ed ia te

R es ul t

O ut co m e In di ca to r(

s) O ut pu t In di ca to r( s)

D O

IR

.1 Im pr ov ed e ne rg y ac ce ss fo r ho us eh ol ds

R

.2 In cr ea se d cl ea n en er gy fo r he al th a nd b as ic h um an s er vi ce s

IR

.3 In cr ea se d bu sin es s an d em pl oy m en t o pp or tu ni tie s, pa rt ic ul ar ly fo r w om en , b y im pr ov ed a cc es s to e ne rg y jo b, te ch ni ca l, or p ro fe ss io na l d ev el op m en t t ra in in g as a r es ul t of

P ow er A fr ic a as sis ta nc e

[a lso a pp lic ab le : 1

.1 .1

E le ct ric ity a cc es s:

N um be r o f n ew o n-a

IR

.4 Im pr ov ed e ne rg y ac ce ss fo r m ar gi na liz ed p op ul at io ns di re ct c on ne ct io ns

D O

IR

.1

In cr ea se d cl ea n en gy ge ne ra tio n to r ed uc e cu rr en t a fu tu re c ar bo n em iss io ns

2.

1.

G re en ho us e ga s (G

H G

) e m iss io ns , e st im at m et ric to ns o f c ar bo n di ox id e-eq ui va le nt (C

O 2e re du ce d, qu es te re d, o r av oi de d th ro ug h cl ea n en er gy a s su pp or te by

2.

1.

Pr oj ec te d

G H

G e m iss io ns r ed uc ed o r av oi de d fr om op te d la w s, po lic ie s, re gu la tio ns , o r te ch no lo gi es r el at to cl ea n en er gy a s su pp or te d by U

SG

a ss ist an ce

(E G

. 1 2-

7)

2.

1.

N um be r of c om pe tit iv e pr oc ur em en ts fo r w ra tio n ca pa ci ty im pl em en te d w ith

U

SG

P ow er A fr ic a

2.

1.

Tr an sa ct io ns R ea ch ed F in an ci al

C lo se

N um be r er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

IR

.2 S up po rt ed n at io na l a on al p la nn in g fo r ju st c gy tr an sit io ns

2.

2.

N um be r of h os t -go ve rn m en t p ow er -s ec to r st ra te gi c pl an ni ng d oc um en ts a do pt ed , r ev ise d, a nd /o r im pl em en te d

D O

IR

.1 In cr ea se d ex po rt s of U

.S cl ea n en er gy g oo ds a nd s er vi ce s

A ic a

3.

1.

N um be r of c om pa ni es p ar tic ip at in g in P ow er

A fr ic a

IR

.2 S tr en gt he ne d en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t f or c le an e ne rg y in ve st m en t

3.

2.

A m ou nt o f i nv es tm en t m ob iliz ed (U

SD

) f or c le an e ne rg y

3.

2.

U

SG

In ve st m en t L ev er ag e:

T ot al p ub lic a nd p riv at e fu nd s

3.

2.

Tr ai ni ng a nd C ap ac ity -B ui ld in g

A ct iv iti es

N um be

3.

Po lic y

R ef or m s:

N um be r of n at io na l o r re gi on al la w s, po lic ie s, re gu la tio ns

, o r st an da rd s to e nh an ce e ne rg y-se ct go ve rn an ce fo rm al ly p ro po se d, a do pt ed

, o r im pl em en te d ith dr es s cl ea n en er gy is su es w ith U

SG

a ss ist an ce

(E G

. 1 2-

2)

IR

.3 In cr ea se d in ve st m en t i n an d ut iliz at io n of a dv an ce d en te ch no lo gi es

3.

3.

M

W a nd m eg aw at t-ho ur s (M

W h) o f e ne rg y st or ag e an d en er gy g en er at io n fr om n ew a dv an ce d en er gy te ch no lo es

IR

.4 E nc ou ra ge d so ci al ly in cl us iv e an d en vi ro nm en ta lly r es po ns ib gy in ve st m en t

3.

4.

N um be r of in st itu tio ns a do pt in g po lic ie s or p ro ce du re s to p ro m ot e ge nd er e qu ity in th e en er gy -s ec to r w or kf or ce a s a re su lt of P ow er

A fr ic a su pp t er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

X C

D O

C C

IR

: S tr en gt he ne d an d ex pa s de liv er in g m or e po w er to us s

4.

1.

K ilo m et er s of tr an sm iss io n an d di st rib ut io n po w er li ne s

4.

1.

Ki lo m et er s of

C on st ru ct ed o r

R eh ab ilit at ed

P

Li s:

Th e su m o f l in ea r ki lo m et er s of n ew , r ec on st ru ct ed re ha bi lit at ed , o r up gr ad ed tr an sm iss io n an d di st rib ut io n lin at h av e be en e ne rg iz ed

, t es te d, a nd c om m iss io ne d/ in st al le d

4.

1.

A gg re ga te

L os se s:

A gg re ga te te ch ni ca l, co m m er ci al an d co lle ct io n el ec tr ic ity lo ss es r ed uc ed

/a vo id ed a s a re su lt

4.

R eg io na l E le ct ric ity

T ra de

N ew e le ct ric ity c ap ac ity

M

W a nd M

W h co m m itt ed fo r re gi on al tr ad e th ro ug h po

W fr om tr an sa ct io ns th at h av e be en c om m iss io ne d

4.

1.

N um be r of tr an sa ct io ns th at h av e be en c om m iss io ne d

4.

1.

El ec tr ic ity tr an sm iss io n ca pa ci ty

(M W

s) s up po rt ed b y

U

SG

a ss ist an ce

4.

1.

N um be r of

P ow er A fr ic a-su pp or te d ut ilit ie s im pr ov ed p er fo rm an ce (r ed uc tio n in fr eq ue nc y of o ut ag es an d du ra tio n of o ut ag es ac hi ev ab le , s uc h th at

P ow er A fr ic a w ill be a cc ou nt ab le fo r as se ss in g pr og re ss a ga in st it s ta rg et s.

Th e

Pe rf or m an ce

In di ca to r Su m m ar y

Ta bl e (s ee T ab le b el ow

) p ro vi de s an o ve rv ie w o f a ll

Po w er A fr ic a pe rf or m an ce in di ca to rs

It in cl ud es a b rie f d es cr ip tio n of th e in di ca to r co lle ct d at a, a re d es cr ib ed in d et ai l i n ea ch P

IR

S in A nn ex er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

Ta bl e 2.

P er fo rm an ce

In di ca to r S um m ar y Ta bl e

P er fo rm an ce I nd ic at or

D es cr ip ti on

U ni t of

M ea su re

R ep or ti ng

F qu en cy M et ho d/ S ou rc e R es po ns ib le P ar ty

1.

1.

El ec tr ic ity

A cc es s:

N um be r

D isa gg re ga tio n:

T yp e of C on ne ct io n:

co nn ec tio ns co nn ec tio ns co nn ec tio ns

U

SG

v s pa rt rs

Ty pe o f E nt er pr ise co nn ec tio ns

(i.

e.

, r ef ug ee s)

N um be nn ec tio ns Q ua rt er ly

O n-gr id c on ne ct io ns

(a ct ua l):

nn ec tio n do cu m en ts pr oc ur em en t d oc um en ts fo r m et er s as so ci at ed w ith g rid ex pa ns io n;

p ro je ct d oc um ts sa s or in st al la tio n of s ys te m s w he re s up po rt h as b ee n pr ov

Po er A fr ic a pr iv at e-se rt ne r re po rt v ia

S ec to r

Le ad

R M s in

P A

IS

U

SG

-f un de d m ec ha ni sm po rt v ia

M

EL

P O

C s/

A O

R s/

C O

R s/

A M s in

P A

IS

Im pl em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm p ro vi de d te ch ni ca l co m pa ny r ep or t v ia it s

EL

ni ca l a ss ist

Es tim at ed N um be

D isa gg re ga tio

C ou nt rie s

U

SG

v s pa rt ne rs

N um be

Q ua rt er ly Sa le s re co rd s fr om

U

SG

s el l p ro du ct iv e-us e el ec tr ic a pp lia nc es gr id d ev ic es o r sy st em s

(e .g fo od p ro ce ss in g m ac hi ne s, w at er p um ps

, r ef rig er at s) so ld a s a re su lt of s up pa er A fr ic a M

EL

te am

A O

R /C

O R s of

U

SA

ID

Im pl em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s re po rt in g on th is in di ca to r, R

M s of A ge nc ie s, an d

R M s, Se ct or

L ea ds c ol le ct in g da ta th e pr iv at e se ct or a s w el l a s do no r pa rt er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

1.

1.

N um be r of p ro du ct iv e-us e as a r es ul t o f U

SG

/P ow er A fr ic a

D isa gg re ga

C ou nt ry

Ty pe o f d ev ic e or s ys

So la r W at er

P um ps –H ea lth

So la r

W at er P um ps

–D om es tic

Bu sin es s

R ef rig er at or s– H lth

R ef rig er at or s–

D om es tic

/B us in la r

En er gy S to ra ge S ys

Sc ho ol s–

In st itu tio na l S ol ar

P

Sy st em

H ea lth

–I ns tit ut io na l S ol ar P

Sy em

Fi sh in g Li gh ts

M ai ze ills el di ng

E qu ip m t ar pe nt ry

E qu ip m en t

Bu sin es s En te rt ai nm en t S ys te m

Sa lo n Eq ui pm en t

M ic ro n Sp ra ye

Ba tt er y St ic k

Ki la r Po w er

S ys te m

/S ol ar g en er

E-bi ke s

So la r ch ar gi ng s ys te m s ( e

-b ik e ch ar gi ng s ta tio ns

Pu bl ic

A dd re ss

K it

Se w in g M ac hi ne K it

Ph on e C ha rg in g

St at io n

Ki t

So la r-

Po w er ed

A gr o- Pr oc es sin g

M ac hi ne s

So la r Ir rig at io n

Eq ui pm en t

O th er

N um be r of d ev ic es Q ua rt er ly

St an da rd iz ed e le ct ro ni c lle ct io n te m pl at e M

EL

p oi nt o f c on ta ct

M iss io ns

L ia iso ns

In te ra ge nc y Li ai so ns

I.2 .I

N um be r of p ub lic fa ci lit ie s D isa gg re ga

W ith m at er ni ty

/d el iv er y ca re

W ith in -p at ie nt tr ea tm en t c ap ac ity

W ith o ut pa tie nt tr ea tm en t c ap ac ity

N um be r of p ub lic fa ci lit ie s

Q ua rt er ly C ou nt o f p ub lic fa ci lit ie s ov ed e ne rg y-pr od uc tio n eq ui pm en t a nd r el el ec tr ic al in st al la tio ns

1.

3.

N um be r of e m pl oy ed w ni ca l, or p ro fe ss io na l de ve lo pm en t t ra in in g as a r es ul t of

P ow er A fr ic a as sis ta nc e

D isa gg re ga tio n:

C ou nt ry o f o rig in o f t he p ar tic ip an t

Ty pe o f t ra in in g

(t ec hn ic al o r pr of es sio na l sk ills d ev el op m en t)

N um be r of e m pl oy en r ec ei vi tr ai ni ng

Q ua rt er ly Tr ai ni ng /e ve nt p ar tic ip dg er

D at a to b e co lle ct ed b y

Im pl em en tin g

Pa rt ne rs

(I Ps er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

2.

1.

G

H G e m iss io ns , e st im at ric to ns o f C O

2e , r ed uc ed se qu es te re d, o r av oi de d th ro ug h cl ea n en er gy w ith gg re ga

SG

a ge nc ie s cl ea n-en er gy

-f un de d ac tiv iti

IM

s cl ea n-en er gy

-f un de d ac tiv iti es

C ou nt ry

N um be r of m ric ns o f C O

2e A nn ua lly G

H G d at a w ill be c al cu la te d fr om tr an sa ct io ns ac he d C om m er al

O ra tio ns D at e

(C O

D ) b y us in g th e

IC

F

C le an E ne rg y Em iss io n R ed uc tio n

(C

LE

ER

to ol

C O

R /A

O R

/A ct iv ag er fo r Im pl em en tin g M ec ha ni sm s, In te ra ge nc y Li ai so ns , a nd P ow er

A fr ic a

R el at io ns hi p M an ag or s le ad

2.

1.

Pr oj ec te d

G H

G e m iss du ce d or a vo id ed te d la w s, po lic ie s, re gu la tio ns , o r te ch no lo la te d to c le an e ne rg y a ss ist an ce

(E G

. 1 2-

7)

D isa gg re ga

Ye ar s to

N um be r of m ric o f C O

2e A nn ua lly G

H G d at a w ill be c al cu la te d fr om tr an sa ct io ns he d Fi na nc ia l C lo se

(F C by u sin g th e

IC

F C

LE

ER

to ol

C O

R /A

O R

/A ct ag er fo r Im pl em en tin g M ec ha ni sm s, In te ra ge nc y Li ai so ns , a nd P ow er

A fr ic a

R el at io ns hi p M an or s le ad

2.

1.

N um be r of c om pe tit iv e pr oc ur em en ts fo r ra tio n ca pa ty em en te d w ith U

SG

P gg re ga tio n:

O n-gr id

(g en er at io n, tr an sm iss n, er s) p ro cu re m en t

Ty pe o f p ro cu re m en t p ro ce ss (e

.g re ve rs e au ct io n)

C ou nt ry

U

SG

a ge nc y th at s up po rt ed a ss ist

(in ud in g

Po w er A fr ic a Im pl em en tin g M ec ha ni sm if U

SA

ID

N um be pe tit iv e pr oc ur em en ts

Q ua rt er ly Pu bl ic a nn ou nc em en t o f pr oc ur em en t p ro ce ss in cl ud in g an e xp la na tio ho

P ow er A fr ic a su pp or t en ha nc ed th e pr oc ur em en t

C O

R /A

O R s, In te ra ge nc y lia iso er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

2.

1.

Tr an sa ct io ns R ea ch ed F in an lo se

N um be r of tr an sa ct gg re ga tio n:

Te ch no lo gy

(e .g hy dr o, s ol ar , g eo th er m al w in d, r en ew ab le b io m as s, bi om as s an d bi of ue ls, g as , o th er

Tr an sa ct io n ty pe s

Po w er g en er at io n (n ew g en er at io n [c le an e ne rg y vs . o th er ge ne ra tio n ex pa ns io n, re ha bi lit at io n/ op tim iz at io n)

Tr an sm iss io n

D ist rib ut io n

ES

Ss

Tr an sa ct io n st ag e (S ta ge

P re

-f ea sib ilit y;

St e

Fe as ib ilit y/

Pr oj ec t D ev el op m en t;

St ag e

Pr oj ec t S tr uc tu rin g/

Fi na nc in g)

C ou nt ry

U

SG

v s.

pa rt ne r Po w er

A fr ic a tr an sa ct io n

N um be

Tr sa ct io ns

Q ua rt er ly

Q ua rt er ly s ub m iss le ad o n in pu tt in g in fo rm at io on sa ct io ns th at ey ar di re ct ly s up po rt in g or th ey th in k th e

U

SG

s ho ul d co ns su pp or tin g.

M iss ew a nd p rio rit iz e tr an sa ct io ns u sin g

Q

TA

T

A dd iti on al d at a th ro ug h qu ar te rly r ep bm itt ed b y D

FC

U

ST

D A

, E x-

Im , a

C

U pd at es fr om

R M s, Se ct or

L ea ds , a nd /o r co m m un ic at io n ne rs

Po w er A fr ic a M

EL

te am

A O

R /C

O R s of

U em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s re po rt in g on th is in di ca to r, R

M s of A ge nc y pa rt ne rs

D Ps

, a nd

P

SP

s su pp or tin g th is in di ca er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

2.

1.

A dd iti on al

P ow er G en er at io n C ap ac ity a t F in an ci al C lo se

N um be r of

M W sa ct io ns th at h av e ac hi ev gg re ga tio n:

Te ch no lo gy (e

.g hy dr o, s ol ar

, g eo th er m al w in d, r en ew ab le b io m as s, bi om as s an d bi of ue ls, g as

, o th er

Tr an sa ct io n ty pe s

Po w er g en er at io n

(n ew g en er at io n

[c le an e ne rg y vs

. o th er ge ne ra tio n ex pa ns io n, re ha bi lit at io n/ op tim iz at io n)

Tr an sa ct io n st ag e (S ta ge

P re fe as ib ilit y;

S ta ge

F ea sib ilit y/

Pr oj ec t

D ev el op m en t;

St ag e

Pr oj ec t

St ru ct ur in g/

Fi na nc in g)

C ou nt ry

U

SG

v s.

pa rt ne r Po w er

A fr ic a tr an sa ct io n

N um be sa ct io ns

Q ua rt er ly

Q ua rt er ly s ub m iss le ad o n in pu tt in g in fo rm at io sa ct io ns th at di re ct ly s up po rt in g or th ey th in k th e

U

SG

s ho ul d co ns or tin g.

M iss ew a nd p rio rit iz e tr an sa ct io ns u sin g th e

Q

TA

T

A dd iti on al d at a th ro ug h qu ar te rly r ep bm itt ed b y D

FC

U

ST

D A

, E x-

Im pd at es fr om ci es

, D P

R M s, PS

P Se ct or

L ea ds , a nd /o r U

SA

ID

Im pl em en tin g co m m un ic at io n de lo pe rs

Po w er A fr ic a M

EL

te am

A O

R /C

O R s of

U em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s re po rt in g on th is in di ca to r, R

M s of A ge nc y pa rt ne rs

D Ps

, a nd

P

SP

s su pp or tin g th is in di ca to r

2.

2.

N um be r of h os t-go ve rn m en t po w er

-s ec to r st ra te gi c pl an do cu m en ts a do pt ed , r ev ise d/ or im pl em en te d w ith gg re ga tio n:

Ju st e ne rg y tr an sit io n/

O

Ju e ne rg y tr an sit io n/ O th er

Fo rm al ly p ro po se d, r ev ise d, a do pt ed em en te d

Ty pe

(d em an d an al ys is, g en er at io n tr an sm iss io n/ di st rib ut io n pl an

, o th er

R eg io na l, na tio na l, in te rn at io na l

C ou nt ry

N um be r of p la nn in g do cu m en ts Bi an nu al ly

Pu bl ic a nn ou nc em en t o f pr oc ur em en t p ro ce ss va nt p la nn in g do cu m ct ed b y

Po w er A fr ic a en tit ie s

A O

R /C

O R s

In te ra ge nc y

Li ai so er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

3.

1.

N am e of In di ca r:

N um be r of

U .S

. c om pa ic ip at in g in

P ow er A fr ic a Pr oj ec ts /T ra ns ac tio ns a s a re su lt of

U

SG

a ss ist an ce N um be r of c om pa ni es p ar tic ip at in g in P ow er

A fr ic a

Pr oj ec ts

Tr an sa ct io ns (U ni te d St e;

gg re ga rg an iz at io n ty pe

(a ss oc ia tio n, fo un da n;

no n-go ve rn m en ta l o rg an iz at io n (N

G O co ns ul tin g se rv ic es

, d ev el op er /s po ns or en gi ne er in g/ pr oc ur em en t/ co ns tr uc tio n

(E

PC

eq ui pm en t s up pl ie r, pr iv at e eq ui ty /d eb t p ro vi de r, tr an sm iss io n, rib ut io n co m pa ny

Sm al l b us in es s or n ot a s m al l b us in es s

Pa rt ic ip at io n pu rs ua nt to a

U

SG

s up po oj ec t

N um be pa ni es Bi an nu al ly

Pu bl ic a nn ou nc em en ts m em or an da o f u nd er st an

U s, co nt ra ct s/ aw ar ds an d ot he r re le va nt do cu m en ta tio n, a s re vi ew ca pt ur ed w ith in th e Po w er

A fr ic a

Tr ac ki ng

T oo l (P

A

TT

) a nd o th er P

A ic a da ta s ys te m s

Tr an sa ct io ns

T ea m L

Te am L ea d, R el at io ns hi p M an ag er (R

M ) T ea m

L

Ta sk

O rd er C

O

3.

A m ou nt o f i nv es tm en t m ob iliz ed

(U

SD

) f or c gy w ith U

SG

a ss ist gg re ga

Pu bl ic

, d om es tic

Pu bl ic

, i nt er na tio na l

Pr iv at e, d om es tic

Pr iv at e, in te rn at io na l

Te ch no lo gy

(e .g hy dr o, s ol ar , g eo th er m al w in d, r en ew ab le b io m as s, ga s)

S do lla r Q ua rt er ly

A m ou nt m ob iliz ed o f tr an sa ct io ns th at h av e re ac he d

FC

w ill be s ou rc p ro je ct d oc um en ts su ch a s th e pr oj ec t ag re em en t.

D at a so ur ce s w ill in cl ud e po w er p oo ls

(W es t A fr ic a

Po w er P oo l

(W A

PP

Ea st

A fr ic a

Po ol

(E A

PP

So ut he rn

A fr ic a

Po w er P oo l (

SA

PP

, D

Ps an d

PS

Ps

Po w er A fr ic a M

EL

te am

A O

R /C

O R s of

U em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s re po rt in g on th is in di ca to r, R

M s of U

SG

a ge nc ie s, D Ps an d

PS

Ps s up po rt in g th is in di ca to r

3.

2.

U

SG

In ve st m en t L ev er e:

To l p ub lic a nd p riv at e fu nd s le ve ra ge d by

U

SG

fo r en gg re ga tio n:

C ou nt ry

G en de r le ns in ve st in g

(G

LI

) o r no n-ge in ve st in g (G

LI

O n-gr id p ow er g en er at io n

G en er at io n ca pa ci ty

Tr an sm iss io n

D ist rib ut io n

Te ch no lo gy (w in d, ti da l, so la r, ge ot he rm al hy dr o, b io m as s, bi og as a nd g hy og en

U

SG

, p ub lic

(D P) v s.

pr iv at e pa rt ne r

U S do lla r Q ua rt er ly

D at a co lle ct ed rib ut in g pa rt ne rs

C O

R /A

O R

/A ct ag er fo r Im pl em en tin g M ec ha ni sm s

3.

2.

Tr ai ni ng a nd C ap ac ity -B ui ld in g

A ct iv iti es

N um be r of p eo pl e D isa gg re ga tio n:

Se x nu m be r of m en a nd n um be en

C ou nt ry

N um be r of p eo pl e Q ua rt er ly

IM

s an d

U

SG

a ge nc ie s ca pt ur e in fo rm at io n nd an ce r ec or ds ca pt ur e on to

P A

IS

Th e da ta w ill be s up po rt ed do cu m en te d by r eg ist ra tio n an d sig n-in d at a sh ee ai nt ai ne d by th e

IM

s

Po w er A fr ic a M

EL

te am

A O

R /C

O R s of

U em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s re po rt in g on th is in di ca to r, R

M s of a ge nc ie s, an d

R M s, Se ct or

L ea ds c ol le ct in g th e pr iv at e se ct or a s w el l a s do no r pa rt er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

3.

2.

Po lic y

R ef or m s:

N um be r of n at io na l o r re gi on al la w s, po lic ie s, re gu la tio ns

, o r st an da rd s to e nh an ce e ne rg y-se ct or g ov er na nc e fo rm ly os ed

, a do pt ed

, o r im pl em en te d w ith th e su pp or t

D isa gg re ga tio n:

Fo rm al ly p ro po se d, a do pt ed , o r im pl em en te d

La w s, po lic ie s, re gu la tio ns

, o r st an da rd s

R eg io na l o r na tio na l, no te w hi ch r eg io n an d co un tr y

Fo cu s of r ef or m

Pr iv at e-se ct or p ar tic ip at io n

R eg io na l p ow er p oo ls

R en ew ab le o r lo w -e m iss io n en no

G en de r eq ui ty

C om m un ity e ng ag em en t

En vi ro nm en t

U

SG

a ge nc y pr ov id in g as sis ta nc e

N um be r of p ol ic ie s

Q ua rt er ly an d/ or r eg ul at io n an d ad op tio n, o r im pl em en ta tio n in p ub lic a nn ou nc em en t

A O

R /C

O R s/ A ct ag er

(A M

) f or

U em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s

In te ra ge nc y

Li ai so ns

3.

2.

N um be r of in st itu tio ns ov ed c ap ac ity to a dd ss n en er gy is su es w ith as sis ta nc e (E

G . 1

2- 2)

D isa gg re ga tio n:

N at io na l g ov er nm en ta l

Su b-na tio na l g ov er nm en ta l

U til iti es

O th er (e

.g pr iv at e, N G

O , u til ity

N um be itu tio ns A nn ua lly

IM

s an d U

SG

a ge nc ie s ca pt ur e va lid at in g in fo rm at io n an d ca pt ur e on to P

A

IS

A O

R /C

O R s, an d In te ra ge nc y Li ai so ns o f ag en ci es s up po rt in g th is in di ca to r

3.

3.

M

W a nd M

W h of e ne rg y st or ag e an d en er gy g en er at io n fr om n ew a dv an ce d en os e

D isa gg re ga id p ow er s ys te m s)

ES

S te ch no lo gy ty pe

C o-lo ca te d

St an da lo ne

Be hi nd th e m et er

In fr on t o f t he m et er

A ll tr an sa ct io n st ag es

Lo ca tio n

Tr an sm iss io n an d

D ist rib ut io n

ES

S te ch no lo gy ty pe

Le ve l o f i nt er fa ce (t ra ns m iss io rib ut io n) re gu la tio n)

Lo ca tio n

M W a nd

M W h Q ua rt er ly

Q ua rt er ly s ub m iss pu tt in g in fo rm at io sa ct io ns th at di re ct ly s up po rt in g or th ey th in k th e

U

SG

s ho ul d co ns or tin g.

M iss ew a nd p rio rit iz e tr an sa ct io ns u sin g

Q

TA

T

A dd iti on al d at a ob ta ro ug h qu ar rly rt s su bm itt ed b y

U

SG

a ge nc ie s

Q ua rt er ly u pd at es s an d/ or

S ec to r

Le ad s (P

A

TT

co nt rib ut e to th is in di ca to r, R

M S ec to r Le ad , I nt er ag cy c on ta ct (P

O er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

3.

4.

N um be r of in st itu tio ns a do pt in g po lic ie s or p ro ce du re ot e ge nd er e qu ity in th e en er gy -s ec to r w or kf or ce a s a re su lt of P ow er

A fr ic a su pp or t

D isa gg re ga

Pu bl ic v s.

pr iv at e in st itu tio n, C ou nt ry

(c ou nt ry

/ie s w he re p ol ic y is im pl em en te d)

N um be itu tio ns Bi an nu al ly

D at a to b e co lle ct ed b y

IM

s w ho a re w or ki ng gy

-s ec to r in st itu up po rt o f t he ir ad op tin g po lic ie s an d pr oc ed ur ot e ge nd er e qu ity of it s pr op os al , a do pt pl em en ta tio n in p ub lic no un ce m en t

Po w er A fr ic a M

EL

te am

A O

R /C

O R s of

U em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s re po rt in g on th is in di ca to r, R

M s of A ge nc y pa rt ne rs

D Ps

, a nd

P

SP

s su pp or tin g th is in di ca to r

4.

1.

Ki lo m et er s of tr an sm iss io n an d di st rib ut io n po w er li ne s th at r ea ch ed

F C w ith

U

SG

de ve lo pm en t p ar tn er

, o r pr iv at e se ct or p ar tn er s up po rt

D isa gg re ga an sm iss io n vs

. d ist rib ut io n

C ou nt ry

N am e of p ro je ct

(i f a pp lic ab le

St ar t a nd e nd p oi nt

FC

d at e

Ki lo m et er s

Q ua rt er ly re le va nt P ow er

A fr ic a

Im pl em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s, U

SA

ID

IP

s, U

SG

e nt iti es , D

Ps an d

PS

Ps

U

SA

ID

A

O R s/ C

O R s an d A ct iv ity M an ag er s, In te ra ge nc y

Li ai so ns

, D P, s

4.

1.

Ki lo m et er s of c on st ru ct ed o r re ha bi lit at ed p ow er li ne s th e su m o f l in ea r ki lo m et er s of n ew re co ns tr uc te d, r eh ab ilit at ed or u pg ra de d tr an sm iss io n an d di st rib ut io n lin es th at h av e be en e ne rg iz ed , t es te d, m iss io ne d/ in st al le d

, D

P, o r

PS

P su pp or t.

D isa gg re ga an sm iss io n vs

. d ist rib ut io n

C ou nt ry

N am e of p ro je ct

(i f a pp lic ab le

St ar t a nd e nd p oi nt

C om m iss io ni ng d at e

Ki lo m et er s

Q ua rt er ly re le va nt P ow er

A fr ic a

Im pl em en tin g

M ec ha ni sm s, U

SA

ID

IP

s, U

SG

e nt iti es , D

Ps an d

PS

Ps

U

SA

ID

A

O R s/ C

O R s an d A ct iv ity M an ag er s, In te ra ge nc y

Li ai so ns

, D P, s

4.

1.

A gg re ga te

L os se s:

A gg re ga ni ca l, co m m er ci al lle ct io n el ec tr ic ity lo ss du ce d/ av oi de d as a r es ul t of P ow er

A fr ic a as sis ta nc e

D isa gg re ga tio n:

To ta l M W h ge ne ra te d

Pe rc en t o r

M W h of c al cu la te d, e st im at ed or m ea su re d te ch ni ca l l os se s av oi de d

Pe rc en t o r

M W h of c al cu la te d, e st im at ed or m ea su re d co m m er ci al lo ss es a vo id ed

Pe rc en t o r M

W h of c al cu la te tim at ed c ol le ct io n lo ss es a vo id ed

Tr an sm iss io n V s di st rib ut til ity

C ou nt ry

Pe rc en ta ge o f t ot ra tio n A nn ua lly U til ity r ec or ds

, r ur ist rie s of

E ne rg y.

M

EL

P O

C o f I m pl em en tin g M ec ha ni sm s co nt rib ut in is in di ca er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

4.

1.

R eg io na l E le ct ric ity

T ra de ew el ec tr ic ity c ap ac ity in M

W h co m m itt ed fo r re gi e th ro ug h

PP

A s w ith ta nc e

D isa gg re ga tio n:

C ou nt ry X to C ou nt ry Y

(M

/M

W h)

, D ur at io n of th e po w er tr ad e

(lo ng

, m ed iu m

, o r sh or t)

M W h an d M

W Q ua rt er ly

C ro ss -b or de r

PP

A s

(n at io na l m in ist rie s of e ne rg y, u til iti es re gi on al p ow er p oo ls, a nd

/o r na tio na l e le ct ric ity r eg ul at or s)

C O

R s/

A O

R s an d

In te ra ge nc y

Li ai so ns fo r ac tiv iti es s up po rt in g re gi er tr ad e

4.

1.

A dd iti on al

P ow er C ap m iss io ne d:

N um be r o f M fro tr an sa ct io ns th at h av e be gg re ga

Te ch no lo gy

(e .g hy dr o, s ol ar , g eo th er m al w in d, r en ew ab le b io m as s, bi om as s an d bi of ue ls, g as

Tr an sa ct io n ty pe s

Po w er g en er at io n (n ew g en er at io n [c gy v s.

ot he r] , g en er at io n ex pa ns ha bi lit at io n/ op tim iz at io n) tr an sm iss io n

N um be sa ct io ns

Q ua rt er ly

TA

s an d U

SG

p ar tn er s ve rif y th e nu m be r oj ec t p ro po sa ls, d ra ft d ea l ag re em en ts , o r ne go tia tio n do cu m en ts a nd u pd at e th e tr an sa ct io n da ta in

P A

TT

TA

s, R M

S ec to r

Le ad s, In te ra ge nc y Li ai so ns , a nd th e

4.

1.

Tr an sa ct io ns C om m iss io d:

um be r o f t ra ns ac tio ns th at h av e be en c om m iss io ne d

Te ch no lo gy

(e .g hy dr o, s ol ar , g eo th er m al w in d, r en ew ab le b io m as s, bi om as s an d bi of ue ls, g as

Tr an sa ct io n ty pe s

Po w er g en er at io n

(n ew g en er at io n

[c le an e ne rg y vs

. o th er ge ne ra tio n ex pa ns io n, re ha bi lit at io n/ op tim iz at io n)

Tr an sa ct io n st ag e (S ta ge

Pr e-fe as ib e

- F ea sib ilit y/ Pr oj ec t D ev el op m en t;

St ag e

- P ro je ct S tr uc tu rin g/ Fi na nc in g)

C ou nt ry

U

SG

v s

Pa rt ne r

Po w er A fr ic a Tr an sa ct io n

M W

Q ua rt er ly

Q ua rt er ly s ub m iss io ns b y in pu tt in g in fo rm at io sa ct io ns th at di re ct ly s up po rt in g or th ey th in k th e

U

SG

s ho ul d co ns or tin g.

M iss ew a nd p rio rit iz e tr an sa ct io ns u sin g th e

A ss ist an ce T oo l (

Q

TA

T)

O bt ai n ad di tio na l d at a th ro ug h qu ar rly rt s su bm itt ed b y

D

FC

, U

ST

D A

, E x-

Im pd at es fr om ci es

, D P

R M s, PS

P Se ct or

L ea ds , a nd /o r U

SA

ID

Im pl em en tin g co m m un ic at io n de lo pe rs

S ee

T ra ns ac tio n

U pd at e

St an rd ra tin g

Pr oc ed ur e (S

P)

EL

P O

C o f I Ps c ho os in rib ut e to th is in di ca er A fr ic a | M on ito ri ng

, E va lu at io n an d

Le ar ni ng

P la n

4.

1.

El ec tr ic ity tr an sm iss io n ca pa ty

(M

) s up po rt ed b y ta nc e

D isa gg re ga tio n:

N ew v s.

up gr ad ed v s.

re ha bi lit at ed

M W

Q ua rt er ly

FC

d oc um en t o r fu sb ur se m en t r ep or t, co m m iss io ni ng r ep or t

M

EL

P O

C o f I Ps c ho os in rib ut e to th is in di ca to r

4.

1.

N um be r of

P ow er A fr ic a-su pp or te d ut ilit ie s ov ed p er fo rm

(r uc tio n in fr eq ue nc y ou ge s an d du ra tio ou ge s)

D isa gg re ga tio n:

U til ity

C ou nt ry

Tr an sm iss io n vs

. d ist rib ut io n

Sy st em

A ve ra ge

In te rr up tio n

D ur at io n In de x

(S A

ID

I) vs . S ys te m A ve ra

In rr up tio n

Fr eq ue nc y In de x

(S A

IF

I) vs . M om en ta ry

A ve ra ge

In te rr up tio n

Fr eq ue nc y In de x

(M A

IF

I)

N um be r of u til iti es A nn ua lly U til ity d oc um en ta tio n co nt rib ut e to th is in di ca to r

4.

1.

N um be r of

M W fr om p ra tio n tr an sa ct io ns gg re ga tio n:

Te ch no lo gy (e

.g hy dr o, s ol ar

, g eo th er m al w in d, r en ew ab le b io m as s, bi om as s an d bi of ue ls, g as

Tr an sa ct io n ty pe s Po w er g en er at io n

(n ew g en er at io n

[c gy v s.

ot he r]

, g en er at io n ex pa ns ha bi lit at io n/ op tim iz at io n)

Tr an sa ct io n st ag e (S ta ge

Pr e-fe as ib e

- F ea sib ilit y/ Pr oj ec t D ev el op m en t;

St ag e

- P ro je ct S tr uc tu rin g/ Fi na nc in g)

C ou nt ry

U

SG

v s pa rt ne r

Po w er A fr ic a tr an sa ct io n

N um be r of M

W Q ua rt er ly ve rif y th e nu m be r of

M W s fr om p ro je ct p ro po sa ls, af t d ea l a gr ee m en ts o r ne go tia tio n do cu m en ts up te th e tr an sa ct io n da

PA

TT

W he ne ve r po ss ib le so ur ce d oc um en ts s ho ul be up ad ed in to th e

PA

TT

o r sh ar ed w ith th e Po w er

A fr ic a

M

EL

te am co nt rib ut e to th is in di ca

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan24

Data Quality Assessment Procedures

Power Africa will comply with Agency guidelines for data quality, as expressed in the ADS 201. We will use consistent DQA procedures to verify and validate the measured values of the actual performance information. As required, DQAs will be conducted for all externally reported indicators within three years of submission to USAID/Washington. DQAs that did not have a successful outcome will be repeated until the data meet the required data-quality standards.

The PIRS for each indicator has a section devoted to data-quality issues and the date for when a DQA is scheduled (see information regarding data quality.

Every three years, Power Africa will examine data quality through structured, periodic assessments to ensure that

• Validity: Data should clearly and adequately represent its intended monitoring function;

• Reliability:

• Integrity: Data collected should have safeguards to minimize the risk of transcription error or data manipulation;

• Precision:

• Timeliness: Data should be available at a useful frequency, should be current, and should be timely enough to

These assessments will utilize a DQA Worksheet that applies a series of related questions to the data for each performance indicator (see Annex V). When necessary, Power Africa will supplement the DQA Worksheet with other tools for

Worksheet facilitates a better understanding of the data collection process and system for each indicator.

Evaluation Plan activity implementation and adaptive management, as well as inform new activity design. Each programmatic evaluation certain result occurred, as well as provides learning opportunities that can inform future programming.

in programming and implementation to be used as a regular part of planning and managing its program.

of learning and adaptive management. The monitoring data, partner engagements and performance reviews will inform which programs to evaluate. Below are some of the proposed evaluations (this plan is subject to change, based on shifts in programmatic priorities and/or constraints):

• Southern Africa Energy Program (SAEP) Implementing Mechanism Endline Evaluation

• West Africa Energy Program (WAEP) Implementing Mechanism Endline Evaluation

• Nigeria Power Sector Program (NPSP) Implementing Mechanism Endline Evaluation

• East Africa Energy Program (EAEP) Implementing Mechanism Endline Evaluation

• Power Africa Senior Advisors Group (PA-SAG) Programme Endline Evaluation

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan25

Finally, the MEL team is exploring means of evaluating the impacts and results of activities beyond their completion date, in support of both capturing the full range of impacts of our work, as well as encouraging and supporting long-term planning via activity pipeline development and management.

A detailed evaluation plan, including a summary of each planned evaluation, can be found under Annex II.

Collaboration, Learning, and Adapting Plan the program cycle. The following paragraphs outline the priorities and objectives for ongoing learning. For Power Africa to on the successes and challenges faced by previous activities. This will be achieved through a set of CLA activities that both and leverage feedback loops into supporting program design, redesign of activities, as well as sharing best practices in the sector on how to achieve universal access to energy across SSA.

Planned CLA activities include:

portfolio reviews)

• Use technology and human resources (e.g., design, maintenance, and data and knowledge management systems)

• Promote a culture of learning (e.g., CLA events, integration of CLA tenets and processes within new activities)

A detailed CLA Plan, including a timeline of CLA activities, is included under Annex III.

Reporting

Power Africa has a number of regular reports authored in coordination between the MEL team and the Communications team. To enhance learning within Power Africa and among partners and other stakeholders, Power Africa will regularly qualitative performance information gathered through its performance monitoring systems, evaluations, special studies, and other relevant sources.

Table 3. Power Africa MEL Reporting Schedule

Report Audience When Content Team Responsible Performance Plan and Report (PPR)

Congress November/ December Progress on performance indicators

MEL Specialist

Portfolio Review (Strategic level) and Issues Paper

Power Africa November A strategic-level review of the Power Africa portfolio involving all relevant stakeholders. The issues paper will provide analysis of lessons learned and items to follow up

MEL (MEL Team Lead/ Power Africa Program

Portfolio Review Issues Paper

Power Africa November/ December lessons learned/issues/follow-up

MEL (MEL Team Lead/ PRO Director)

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan26

Budget Review Power Africa March August

Performance data and portfolio review issues paper

Budget team with data from MEL

Annual Report Public, Government Stakeholders, including Congress and the White House

February Progress on performance indicators and transactions

PRO in coordination with MEL and the Communications team

Portfolio Review (activity focus) & Issues Paper

Power Africa May An activity-level review of the Power Africa portfolio involving all relevant stakeholders. The issues paper will provide analysis of lessons learned and items for follow-up

MEL (MEL Team Lead/ PRO Director)

Q1 data call Power Africa Jan, 30 days following the end of the quarter

Performance indicator data and MEL (MEL Specialist and MEL Team Lead)

Q2 data call Power Africa April, 30 days following the end of the quarter

Performance indicator data and MEL (MEL Specialist and MEL Team Lead)

Q3 data call Power Africa July, 30 days following the end of the quarter

Performance indicator data and MEL (MEL Specialist and MEL Team Lead)

Q4 data call Power Africa October, 30 days following the end of the quarter

Performance indicator data and MEL (MEL Specialist and MEL Team Lead)

For these reports, Power Africa carefully vets all transaction and connection data through SOPs, which are detailed in

Roles and Responsibilities

Performance monitoring is the ongoing and routine collection of performance indicator data to reveal whether desired results are being achieved and whether implementation is on track. Power Africa analyzes performance by comparing actual results achieved against the targets initially set at the beginning of a project or activity. This analysis is critical, as it will enable Power Africa to learn and adapt in ways that can strengthen its activities and achieve maximum results. The

Missions, IPs, and other stakeholders.

sibilities in implementing, maintaining, and updating the overall performance management system. More detail about roles and responsibilities for all stakeholders is detailed in Annex VI. Roles and responsibilities of the following stakeholders are detailed below:

CORs/ AORs oversee partner performance on a regular and ongoing basis by reviewing partner reports, verifying data, and conducting site visits.

Activity Managers Activity managers are primarily responsible for ensuring that the terms of the agreement are being met and will monitor

MEL Team Led by the team lead, the MEL team is primarily responsible for overseeing data collection, reporting, and learning for the whole Power Africa portfolio, as well as designing assessments and evaluations to detail outcomes of Power Africa by various individuals, the unit will contribute to various aspects of:

Power Africa | Monitoring, Evaluation and…