J-5 Past Performance Evaluation Survey.doc

DOC document 60 KB Posted

Attached to
Elevator Refurbishment and Preventive Service Maintenance Agreement at BGR ATCT in Bangor, ME
Solicitation number
697DCK-22-R-00574
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance evaluation survey template and details of a related federal contract opportunity for an elevator refurbishment and maintenance agreement. The past performance evaluation survey is intended to collect feedback from references on a contractor's previous work quality, timeliness, project management, and compliance on elevator modernization or maintenance contracts valued at $150,000 or more. Specifically, the survey requests ratings and comments on quality control, workmanship, schedule adherence, problem resolution, communication, manager qualifications, elevator performance, and safety compliance. It also asks how many unscheduled maintenance call-backs occurred in the first six months and first year after a refurbishment.

The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Federal Aviation Administration Southwestern Region to refurbish and provide preventive maintenance for elevators at the Bangor Air Traffic Control Tower in Bangor, Maine. Interested vendors must be registered in the System for Award Management and submit a proposal in accordance with the solicitation's instructions by the response date. Relevant experience and past performance will be evaluated.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFI Set 1.pdf PDF
697DCK-22-R-00574 Amend 0003.pdf PDF
697DCK-22-R-00574 Amend 0002.pdf PDF
Amendment 697DCK-22-R-00574 0001.pdf PDF
J-1a Drawings.pdf PDF
J-3 SCA Wage Rates.pdf PDF
J-1 BGR Elevator Refurbishment SPECS Final (1).pdf PDF
J-4 - Standardized Proposal Breakdown.xls XLS spreadsheet
J-2 Davis Bacon Wage Rates.pdf PDF
697DCK-22-R-00574 (Final).pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION SURVEY

A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Contractor Point of Contact (Name and Title):

C. Phone number (including area code):

D. Contract No.:

E. Project Title:

Description of the Work Performed (Modernization, Full Service Maintenance, Multiple Elevators, etc.): NOTE THAT THE CONTRACT MUST INCLUDE COMPLETED MODERNIZATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED RELEVANT F. Description of Criticality (Hospital, FAA, Government Facility, Military Facility, etc.):

G. Project Award Date: ___________________ Completion Date (Modernization Must Be Completed within the last three years):_________________

H. Project Award Amount: __________________ Final Project Amount: _________________

(Must be at least $150K to be considered Relevant) I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the FORMCHECKBOX Prime Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Subcontractor

J. Respondent Information:

Name:

Organization:

Phone Number:

Email:

K. Authorization is hereby granted to the respondent listed above in section J to provide the information requested in Section B of this survey.

(Signature)

(Name & Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent) *Note: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed.

LESS FAVORABLE

MORE FAVORABLE

U
M
S
A
O
Unsatisfactory (Negative)
Marginal (Negative)
Satisfactory
Above Average
Outstanding

EVALUATION AREAS

(Circle the appropriate response – if Not Applicable insert N/A next to the statement)

1. Quality

a. Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures which resulted in a quality performance.

b. Contractor completed all modernization work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

2. Timeliness of Performance

a. Contractor met established project schedules to complete the modernization on time, as scheduled.

b. The contractor met expected elevator maintenance response times.

U
M
S
A
O

3. Project Management

a. Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations

b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed and maintained communication.

c. Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

U
M
S
A
O

4. Elevator Performance

a. Elevator performed/operated in accordance with the applicable Statement of Work, Drawings, and Specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

5. Compliance

a. Contractor’s performance was in accordance with all applicable Elevator, Safety, Health, and Security requirements and the requirements of the applicable Statement of Work, Drawings, and Specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

Overall Past Performance Rating

U
M
S
A
O

Call Backs: Please provide the number of unscheduled maintenance call-backs in the first six (6) months of refurbishment and in the first year of refurbishment, to assist the FAA in award evaluation.

· First Six (6) Months: ___________

· First Year: _________

Comments:

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .