J-13 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS PATUXENT (T-AO 201) FY21 Mid-Term Availability
Solicitation number
N3220521R4110
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details regarding a federal solicitation for mid-term availability services for a naval vessel. The past performance questionnaire is seeking performance ratings and commentary from references regarding a contractor's previous work on an unspecified contract. It requests assessments of quality, timeliness, business relations, and personnel. Responses are due by March 15, 2021.

The associated federal contract opportunity is solicitation number N3220521R4110 from the Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command for mid-term availability services for the USNS PATUXENT (T-AO 201) in fiscal year 2021. The solicitation relates to maintenance and repair work during the scheduled mid-term maintenance period for the vessel. No further details are provided in the attachments regarding requirements, pricing, or terms for the mid-term availability services.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N3220521C4110-0003.pdf PDF
N3220521R4110-0002.pdf PDF
N3220521R4110-0001.pdf PDF
Work Item Index (3.3.21).docx DOCX document
Section B (REV A).pdf PDF
J-10 Interport Differential.doc DOC document
CDRL WI-0021.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0010.pdf PDF
21-R-4110 JA PATUXENT MTA (Redacted).pdf PDF
J-12 Past Performance Data.docx DOCX document
J-2 Category A Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL WI-006.pdf PDF
J-4 GFP List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL WI-0019.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0016.pdf PDF
J-7 MSC Repair Facility Survey.docx DOCX document
CDRL WI-004.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0018.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0090.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-007.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0023.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0014.pdf PDF
J-9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL).docx DOCX document
J-3 Category B Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220521R4110.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-001.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0013.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0022.pdf PDF
J-14 Technical Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).docx DOCX document
CDRL WI-0015.pdf PDF
CDRL WI-0012.pdf PDF
J-8 Request for Clarification.docx DOCX document
CDRL WI-0020.pdf PDF
USNS PATUXENT (T-AO 201) FY21 MTA Work Item Index.docx DOCX document
CDRL WI-0017.pdf PDF
Show all 35

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (15 March 2021 at 1400 hours, 2:00 PM EST) to Avonda S. Carter at avonda.carter@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,

Avonda S. Carter
Contract Specialist

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .