ITN_10848_Attachment J.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CINS/FINS & Statewide Respite Care Services
- Solicitation number
- ITN-09961
- Issued by
- Leon County, Florida
About this file
This file is a comparative analysis scoring sheet template from the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice for ITN #10848 regarding CINS/FINS, Respite Bed Services, and Evidence-Based or Promising Practices Delinquency Programming. The document outlines the evaluation criteria and scoring methodology to be used by the Negotiation Team to rank respondents' proposed program services on a 1-2 scale (with 2 being the best). The evaluation categories include Management Capability (20 points), Programming (15 points), Contract Management and Monitoring (15 points), Staffing (10 points), Performance Measures (10 points), and Best Value (10 points).
The document includes detailed evaluation guidance for each category, focusing on alignment with DJJ's mission, implementation planning, staffing capabilities, behavior management systems, living environments, educational services, vocational programming, transition planning, health services, and fidelity monitoring. The scoring sheet emphasizes the importance of evidence-based interventions, comprehensive program monitoring, and overall value proposition including budget considerations and value-added components. No specific pricing terms, funding requirements, or set-asides are mentioned in this evaluation template.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Comp Analysis
| STATE OF FLORIDA | |||||
| Department of Juvenile Justice | |||||
| Prevention Program Office | |||||
| RESPONDENT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS | |||||
| ITN #10848 | |||||
| Title: CINS/FINS, Respite Bed Services, and Evidence-Based or Promising Practices Delinquency Programming | |||||
| INSTRUCTIONS: Negotiation Team members should, through group consensus, rank the Respondent's proposed program services based on the following categories, taking into consideration the initial written and oral response and any changes to the initial response negotiated and set forth in the Respondent's Supplemental Summary Response Request (SSRR). For each CATEGORY, ranking the Respondent either 1 or 2 (2 being the best), comparing one Respondent's proposed program services against the other Respondent, to determine which Respondent's response provides the best overall value to the Department (Ranking # 1), as evidenced by the highest score and consensus of the Team. | |||||
| RESPONDENT NAME | RESPONDENT NAME | ||||
| CATEGORY | Total Weight Per Category | RAW SCORE 1 or 2 | Weighted Score | RAW SCORE 1 or 2 | Weighted Score |
| Management Capability: Mission/Vision, Consistent with Department's direction, Corporate Oversight, Program Administration, Implementation Schedule, Training, Contracted and/or Consultant Services | 20 | ||||
| Programming: Residential and Non-residential Services, Contract Management and Monitoring of Local Service Providers, Transition Plan, Program Implementation, Data Collection Plan, Respite Bed Services, and Evidence-based or Promising Practices Delinquency Programming | 15 | ||||
| Contract Management and Monitoring of Local Services Providers | 15 | ||||
| Staffing | 10 | ||||
| Performance Measures (Fidelity Monitoring/Outcomes and Outputs) | 10 | ||||
| Best Value | 10 |
TOTALS
Top Ranked/Team's Recommendation:
Sheet1
Helpful Tips
| WHAT TO LOOK FOR: |
| Management Capability |
| · Is the mission and vision of the respondent consistent with that of DJJ ? |
| · The ability of the respondent to provide services to youth, consistent with the Roadmap, including, serving youth that are more likely to re-offend. |
| · Is there a comprehensive implementation plan that addresses all components of program start-up? |
| · Evidence of corporate staffing levels sufficient to support and oversee the program; other existing programs and pending ITN projects? |
| Programming |
| · Evidence of a behavior management system that supports a restraint-free program and is responsive to the trauma issues of youth? |
| · Living environment that provides for the safety and security of youth and staff, while maximizing the level or normalcy and individualism for the youth in the program. Consideration of gender-specific issues are addressed as a part of the living environment. |
| · An activity schedule that is consistent with the program staffing levels and allows time for all aspects of the program. |
| · Education services that provide for the varying academic needs for the youth in the youth, including those needing post-secondary education. |
| · Vocational programming that provides for a variety of employment options for youth in the program. |
| · Transition planning services that are sufficiently staffed to ensure that all aspects of transitional planning are addressed, including effective transition for youth from any area of the state. |
| · Plans to provide the sufficient level of staffing to implement all components of the program, including behavior management, education, vocational and transition services. |
Health, Mental Health, Substance Abuse
| Delinquency Intervention |
| · Proposed delinquency interventions that are effective for the youth in the program. |
| · Evidence of the ability to have sufficient staff training to provide proposed interventions. |
| · Activity schedule that includes all proposed interventions at times conducive to meaningful involvement of youth. |
| Performance Measures/Outcomes and Fidelity Monitoring |
| · Performance measures/Outcome that address all components of the program. |
| · Proposed fidelity monitoring plan – both at the program and corporate level |
| · Fidelity monitoring that addresses all aspects of the program, including evidence-based delinquency interventions, general program operations, safety and security, incidents, etc. |
| · Process to track programmatic and administrative issues and process to address pro-active corrective actions and coordination with DJJ |
| Best Value |
| · Overall package of proposed services with the management capability to effectively implement and sustain the services. |
| · Budget |
| · Level of “value added” items present. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .