Individual Score Sheet .doc

State of Nevada Purchasing Division

RFP 44DOC-S1559

STEAM CLEANING KITCHEN EXHAUST SYSTEM - STATEWIDE

Proposal Opening Date: June 8, 2021

Vendor Name:

Evaluator Initials:

(1-10) Adjusted Score

(1-10)

After reading vendor proposals, assign a score for each criterion above between 1 and 10, with 1=Poor and 10=Excellent.

The following sections provide a brief description of the issues related to each factor.

1) Demonstrated Competence:

a. Did the vendor provide sufficient data to convince you that they will do a good job for the State?

b. Was the proof compelling?

c. Are you confident that this vendor has the knowledge, skills and abilities to perform all its tasks well?

d. Will the vendor’s resources be adequate to serve the State’s needs?

e. Does the vendor suggest new ways to enhance performance?

f. Does the vendor have the flexible capacity to handle all the needs of the State as they continue to change?

g. Did the vendor present sufficient performance history to convince you of their ability?

h. Has the vendor been in business long enough to provide good stability?

i. Has the vendor experienced ownership changes that would impact their services?

j. Has there been any censure or litigation history?

2) Experience in Performance of Comparable Engagements:

a. Does the vendor have prior experience that will ensure all the skills necessary to perform tasks well?

b. Did the vendor have success in other work for a private or governmental entity?

c. Does the vendor’s previous work convince you of its successful completion of these duties?

d. Has the vendor provided adequate references?

3) Conformance with the Terms of this RFP:

a. Did the vendor’s proposal provide all the necessary information requested in the RFQ in a professional manner?

b. Did the proposal cause doubt regarding the vendor’s ability to complete the necessary tasks?

c. Was the proposal easy to understand and did it provide answers to questions, or create more questions?

4) Expertise and Availability of Key Personnel:

a. Is the staff that will be assigned to this project by the vendor the best qualified to manage the process?

b. Will they be available to insure completion of the project?

c. Will they be available for follow-up issues?

d. Is sufficient staff assigned to handle these duties?

e. Is there a Nevada office or contact person?

f. Will assigned staff respond to issues within a reasonable amount of time?

5) Cost:

a. Has the vendor established a cost that is reasonable for the project?

b. Is the State of Nevada receiving good value for its dollars?

c. Are the costs reasonable compared to the competition?

d. Will there be any additional costs or other ongoing expenses?

6) Financial Stability:

Evaluators will be provided financial information submitted by the vendor and may be provided analyses or recommendations from a financial expert or rating service. Evaluators should also consider any pertinent matters that are disclosed by the vendor or otherwise known that would have an effect on the vendor’s financial stability. Scoring financial stability as “pass” means that the vendor possesses adequate financial stability to perform its duties under the contract for the full term of the contract.

Vendor Name:

Evaluator Initials:

Comments