Illinois SWIFR Project Narrative.pdf

PDF 268 KB Posted

Attached to
Statewide Recycling Needs Assessment
Solicitation number
24-532EPA-LAND5-B-44877
Issued by
Illinois

About this file

This document is a project narrative for the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's application for the Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling (SWIFR) grants for states and territories. The Illinois EPA plans to use the $733,568 in requested funds to conduct a comprehensive statewide waste generation and characterization study over a three-year period. The study will identify the annualized volume of individual materials generated in Illinois and the end-of-life handling methods of those materials by geographic region. The primary outcome will be providing the Illinois EPA with contemporary data to identify materials streams and generation locations to target for landfill diversion efforts, which may include regulatory changes or targeted use of state grant funds. The budget for this project is entirely dedicated to the contractual costs of conducting the statewide waste characterization study, which the Illinois EPA believes is a reasonable cost based on similar awards issued by other states.

View the file

Other files

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Optional Project Narrative Attachment Form Work Plan for the Solid

Waste Infrastructure for Recycling (SWIFR) Grants for States and

Territories

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

State/Territory Point of Contact:

Name Valerie A. Davis

Title Acting Manager, Materials Management and

Compliance Section—Bureau of Land---Illinois

EPA

Phone 217-785-7492

Email valerie.a.davis@Illinois.gov

Address 1021 North Grand Avenue East, PO Box 19276

Springfield, IL 62794-9276

Total Amount Requested: $ 733,568.00

Period of Performance: October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2026

Section 1. Project Summary and Overall Approach

Summary Statement: EPA's Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling (SWIFR) grants for states and territories will fund activities that support long-term planning and data collection needs to demonstrate progress toward the National Recycling Goal and Food Loss and Waste Reduction Goal and advance a

Circular Economy for materials, as well as support the state-led implementation of plans to advance post-consumer materials management. The purpose of this award is to enhance Illinois’s efforts to meet the SWIFR grants elements. Illinois will conduct a statewide waste characterization study that identifies the annualized volume of individual materials generated in Illinois and the end-of-life handling methods of those materials by geographic region of the state.

A. BACKGROUND:

Description of Existing Program. Illinois EPA anticipates using all awarded funds to conduct a statewide waste generation and characterization study that identifies the annualized volume of wide suite of individual materials generated in Illinois and the end-of-life handling methods of those materials by geographic region of the state. Illinois EPA believes this use is consistent with

“develop[ing], strengthen[ing], and/or implement[ing] data collection efforts that demonstrate progress towards the National Recycling Goal and Food Loss and Waste Reduction Goal” eligibility criteria set forth in the Program Guidance. Illinois EPA plans to utilize a combination of existing mailto:valerie.a.davis@Illinois.gov full-time employees and outside contractors to complete this project within three years of receipt of the award.

Allocation of Funds factors. The Program Guidance identified five factors USEPA would use to evaluate the allocation of SWIFR Funds for awards available to states and territories. The State’s information related to those five factors is detailed below.

1. Legislation in place that mandates solid waste management planning or a waste characterization report:

Illinois law does not require the maintenance of a statewide solid waste management plan.

Indeed, in the last three decades there have been only two legislatively driven statewide efforts that include some of the elements of a solid waste management plan set forth in 40 CFR 256. In

1990, the General Assembly amended the Illinois Solid Waste Management Act to require the

Department of Commerce of Economic Opportunity to develop a report evaluating the effectiveness of existing recycling and solid waste management programs in the state. 415 ILCS

20/7. This report was published in July 1992. In 2019, the General Assembly amended the

Illinois Solid Waste Management Act to require the Illinois EPA to facilitate the Illinois

Statewide Materials Management Advisory Committee. 415 ILCS 20/7.1. That Committee was tasked with authoring a report to the General Assembly that evaluated the effectiveness of existing recycling and waste management infrastructure and identified achievable recommendations to enhance the performance of those systems. This report was published in

July 2021.

Legislation is also currently pending in the General Assembly that would create the Statewide

Recycling Needs Assessment and Postconsumer Recycled Content Act. The legislation calls for

Illinois EPA to have a contractor conduct a Statewide Recycling Assessment that would comprehensively evaluate available options to recycle, compost, and reuse packaging and paper products. This needs assessment is consistent with a portion of the work that will be done under the project proposal for the SWIFR Grant opportunity.

2. Depth and breadth of a state’s data collection efforts:

Illinois law does not require omnibus solid waste and materials management data collection or reporting. A patchwork of state laws requires individual industry sectors to annually report municipal solid waste disposal volumes. These reporting requirements include the volume of solid waste sent to landfills for disposal and landscape waste sent to permitted compost facilities for disposal. There is no comparable requirement to report municipal solid waste generation figures. Illinois EPA data collection efforts are managed by fulltime employees who primarily perform other materials management functions; Illinois EPA has not received any independent funding for statewide materials management data collection efforts in recent decades.

3. When a state’s solid waste management plan or waste characterization report was last updated:

https://epa.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/epa/topics/waste-management/materials-management/documents/mmac-report-approved-7-1.pdf

The State of Illinois does not have an overarching solid waste management plan as contemplated in 40 CFR 256. The closest comparable undertaking is the Materials Management Advisory

Committee’s Report from July 2021. This Report did not include an updated state waste characterization study. The most recent such study took place in 2008.

4. Available resources for implementing a solid waste management program (e.g., budget and personnel):

Illinois EPA does not currently have available funds or staff to exclusively dedicate to implementing a solid waste management program like that outlined in 40 CFR 256. Illinois

EPA contemplates utilizing fulltime employees who currently oversee other materials management programs to perform the functions necessary to administer awarded SWIFR funds.

These employees are paid from a pair of state funds derived from landfill tipping fees. These funds also support core Illinois EPA functions, such as landfill permitting, field inspections, and civil enforcement activities.

5. Additional programmatic factors such as the level of environmental justice incorporated into a program, extent of focus on source reduction efforts, climate considerations, or the existence of other grant programs:

Illinois EPA has the statutory authority to administer recycling and composting grants to a wide range of entities. Although funding has not been appropriated for these programs since 2014, the

Materials Management Advisory Committee identified more than $10 million of state funds that could be appropriated to support such grants without raising fees. Illinois EPA anticipates utilizing these resources to augment efforts undertaken with SWIFR funds if state financing becomes available. Illinois EPA contemplates weaving environmental justice principles and source reduction endeavors into the rubric for the report that will be produced using SWIFR funds.

B. ACTIVITIES, TIMELINE, AND MILESTONES:

Illinois will perform the following activities: Illinois EPA will procure a contractor to conduct a comprehensive statewide generation and waste characterization study in order to develop a detailed report. Illinois EPA will utilize a combination of existing full-time employees and an outside contractor.

The objective of this project is to produce a report detailing the tons of municipal solid waste generated by material type in Illinois and how those materials are handled at the end of their life. These data will be presented in terms of statewide generation and disposal, as well as county-by-county generation and disposal. The types of material will align with the taxonomy of materials included in the Illinois

Materials Management Advisory Committee’s July 2021 report. The report will also detail the reduction of greenhouse gases, in metric tons of carbon dioxide, from collection, recycling, and composting efforts in Illinois. These outputs will be achievable during the assistance agreement funding period.

https://epa.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/epa/topics/waste-management/materials-management/documents/mmac-report-approved-7-1.pdf https://illinoisrecycles.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ICWCGSReport052209.pdf https://epa.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/epa/topics/waste-management/materials-management/documents/mmac-report-approved-7-1.pdf

The primary outcome from the use of these funds will be providing Illinois EPA with contemporary, accurate data reflecting the statewide materials generation profile. These data will enable Illinois EPA to identify specific materials streams and generation locations to target for landfill diversion efforts.

Depending on the results of the waste characterization, those efforts may include regulatory amendments to afford composting facilities flexibility to accept additional food scraps or targeted uses of state funds appropriated by the General Assembly to focus on materials generated at a high rate that are otherwise recoverable given the state’s existing infrastructure.

Timeline/Milestones: Relevant timelines and milestones are identified in the Activities Narrative Table below.

Eligible Activities/Use of Funding:

Table 1: Outputs and Outcomes

Possible

Activities Measures

Conduct

Statewide Waste

Characterization

Study

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D collected, recycled, composted, or managed via other management pathways in the state.

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D generated per material type and source in the state

• Identify viable landfill diversion options for materials generated in the state and the maximal reasonable volume of those materials that could be reasonably diverted

• Identify the possible volume of GHGs that could be reduced (in MTCO2e) from enhanced collection, recycling, composting, or management via other management pathways in the state.

• Number of temporary or permanent jobs created.

Activities Narrative Table

Activities Narrative

Timeframe for

Accomplishment

(FFY Quarter)

Results of Activities

(Outputs)

Projected Environmental or

Programmatic Improvement

(Outcomes)

Task 1: Cooperative Agreement (CA) Oversight

Activity 1: Program Management and Supervision

Supervise and manage the SWIFR grant to meet program goals. Conduct periodic project status meetings with staff to discuss project issues and priorities.

Ongoing annual activities Performance Management

Program (PMP) Evaluations

Maintain effective work force to meet work plan commitments

Submit semi-annual reports and fulfil other reporting requirements in a timely and accurate manner

Semi-annually Semi-annual reports Improved implementation of SWIFR program, increased organization of information to better assist review

Activity 2: Cooperative Agreement Administration

Ensure that CA work plan is developed in accordance with State and EPA policies. Ensure that budget and administrative aspects of application requests conform to State and EPA policies. Review new and revised

CA agreement guidance and serve as a resource for staff.

Annually CA work plans, budgets, and federal assistance forms

Effective CA applications, expedited processing, improved awareness of EPA guidance

Maintain current Quality Management Plan Annually Signed Quality Management

Plan

Grant compliance

Accomplishment

(FFY Quarter)

Results of Activities

(Outputs)

Projected Environmental or

Programmatic Improvement

(Outcomes)

Administer project closeout activities. Within 120 days of grant expiration

Final semi-annual performance report, financial status report

Project closeout

Activity 3: Cooperative Agreement Legal Assistance

Review and provide interpretation of State laws and regulations to ensure effective implementation of the

SWIFR program.

As necessary Legal review Improved implementation of the SWIFR program

Activity 4: Fiscal and Contract Management

Track the status of deliverables for contracted projects As projects progress through program

Semi-annual Report Efficient contracting activity, ensure work plan commitments are met

Task 2: Program Enhancement

Activity 1: Enhance Program

Participate in meetings, conference calls, and other events with EPA and other states to exchange information regarding best practices, program updates, and the like.

As new learning opportunities occur Identification of best practices Established Networks for information exchanges

Evaluate perceived roadblocks to utilizing the SWIFR

Program, reevaluate existing program and incorporate steps to streamline the program and increase its use.

Institutionalize changes. Engage in dialogue with EPA regarding program changes.

Fiscal years 2024 - 2026 Updates to program Increase use of the program

Task 3: Program Activities

Accomplishment

(FFY Quarter)

Results of Activities

(Outputs)

Projected Environmental or

Programmatic Improvement

(Outcomes)

Activity 1: Develop, strengthen, and/or implement comprehensive data collection efforts that demonstrate progress towards the

National Recycling Goal and Food Loss and Waste Reduction Goal.

Develop procurement documents to obtain a contractor to conduct a statewide waste characterization study

First Quarter FFY24 Prepare documents that comply with the Illinois Procurement

Code that will enable the

Illinois EPA to obtain a qualified contractor to conduct a statewide waste characterization

Satisfy the Illinois Procurement Code prerequisites in order to accomplish the outcomes identified in the final row

Publish procurement documents to obtain a contractor to conduct a statewide waste characterization study

Second Quarter FFY24 Obtain a qualified contractor to conduct a statewide waste characterization

Satisfy the Illinois Procurement Code prerequisites in order to accomplish the outcomes identified in the final rows.

Procure and execute contract following successful bidding process

Third Quarter FFY24 Execute contract with a qualified contractor to conduct a statewide waste characterization

Satisfy the Illinois Procurement Code prerequisites in order to accomplish the outcomes identified in the final rows

Contractor conducts outreach effort for study Third Quarter FFY24 Characterize universe in which to conduct study

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D collected, recycled, composted, or managed via other management pathways in the state.

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D generated per material type and source in the state

• Identify viable landfill diversion options for materials generated in the state and the maximal reasonable volume of those materials that could be reasonably diverted

• Identify the possible volume of

GHGs that could be reduced (in

Accomplishment

(FFY Quarter)

Results of Activities

(Outputs)

Projected Environmental or

Programmatic Improvement

(Outcomes)

MTCO2e) from enhanced collection, recycling, composting, or management via other management pathways in the state.

Contractor drafts plan to conduct study Fourth Quarter FFY25 Develop a plan by which study will be conducted

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D collected, recycled, composted, or managed via other management pathways in the state.

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D generated per material type and source in the state

• Identify viable landfill diversion options for materials generated in the state and the maximal reasonable volume of those materials that could be reasonably diverted

• Identify the possible volume of

GHGs that could be reduced (in

MTCO2e) from enhanced collection, recycling, composting, or management via other management pathways in the state.

Provide feedback and comments to proposed plan Fourth Quarter FFY25 Final development of plan based upon Agency feedback.

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D collected, recycled, composted, or managed via other management pathways in the state.

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D generated per material type and source in the state

• Identify viable landfill diversion options for materials generated in the state and the maximal

Accomplishment

(FFY Quarter)

Results of Activities

(Outputs)

Projected Environmental or

Programmatic Improvement

(Outcomes) reasonable volume of those materials that could be reasonably diverted

• Identify the possible volume of

GHGs that could be reduced (in

MTCO2e) from enhanced collection, recycling, composting, or management via other management pathways in the state.

Conduct and finalize statewide characterization study Third Quarter FFY26 Contractor will conduct study to provide a report that refreshes the state’s waste characterization data

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D collected, recycled, composted, or managed via other management pathways in the state.

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D generated per material type and source in the state

• Identify viable landfill diversion options for materials generated in the state and the maximal reasonable volume of those materials that could be reasonably diverted

• Identify the possible volume of

GHGs that could be reduced (in

MTCO2e) from enhanced collection, recycling, composting, or management via other management pathways in the state.

Provide Closeout Report Fourth Quarter FFY26 Contractor will produce a report that refreshes the state’s waste characterization data

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D collected, recycled, composted, or managed via other management pathways in the state.

Accomplishment

(FFY Quarter)

Results of Activities

(Outputs)

Projected Environmental or

Programmatic Improvement

(Outcomes)

• Identify the volume of MSW/C&D generated per material type and source in the state

• Identify viable landfill diversion options for materials generated in the state and the maximal reasonable volume of those materials that could be reasonably diverted

• Identify the possible volume of

GHGs that could be reduced (in

MTCO2e) from enhanced collection, recycling, composting, or management via other management pathways in the state.

C. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: This project includes a clear division of responsibility between the Illinois EPA and the contractor obtained in accordance with the Illinois Procurement Code.

Illinois EPA staff will be responsible for:

• preparing procurement documents;

• arranging for those documents to be published;

• reviewing the submitted bids;

• addressing questions from the contractor;

• reviewing the contractor’s work; and

• performing the administrative functions identified in Tasks 1 and 2 of the Activities Narrative

Table.

The contractor will be responsible for conducting the waste characterization, submitting a report detailing its findings to the Illinois EPA, and complying with all procedural and substantive requirements set forth in the Illinois Procurement Code.

Section 2: Programmatic Priorities and Strategic Plan Goals

The activities described in this workplan support the following grant Programmatic Priorities and EPA’s

FY 2022-2026 Strategic Plan by affording the Illinois EPA the necessary contemporary data to make meaningful programmatic decisions related to materials management and the impact from those materials on GHG emissions:

o Goal 1: Tackle Climate Change,

a. Objective 1.1: Reduce Emissions that Cause Climate Change, o Goal 6: Safeguard and Revitalize Communities,

a. Objective 6.2: Reduce Waste and Prevent Environmental Contamination.

Section 3. Environmental Results—Outputs and Outcomes

The primary output from the use of these funds will be a report detailing the tons of municipal solid waste generated by material type in Illinois, statewide and by county, and how those materials are handled at the end of their life. The types of material will align with the taxonomy of materials included in the Illinois

Materials Management Advisory Committee’s July 2021 report. The report developed using SWIFR funds will also detail the reduction of greenhouse gases, in metric tons of carbon dioxide, from collection, recycling, and composting efforts in Illinois.

The primary outcome from the use of these funds will be providing the Illinois EPA publicly available accurate data reflecting the statewide and local materials generation profile. These data will enable the

Illinois EPA to identify specific materials streams and generation locations to target for landfill diversion efforts. Depending on the results of the waste characterization, those efforts may include regulatory amendments to afford composting facilities flexibility to accept additional food scraps and targeted uses of any state grant funds appropriated by the General Assembly focusing on materials generated at a high rate that are otherwise recoverable given the state’s existing infrastructure. The development of these data will have multiple beneficiaries. First, these data will enable the Illinois EPA https://www2.illinois.gov/epa/topics/waste-management/materials-management/Documents/MMAC_Report_Approved_7_1.pdf to appropriately tailor its programmatic efforts to align with the materials management reality within the state. Second, the report will afford units of local government throughout the state an opportunity to evaluate their historic materials management efforts and, consistent with their available resources, examine enhancements to maximize landfill diversion while minimizing their community’s carbon footprint. Third, the data will provide state policymakers and interest groups a sound foundation for crafting legislative and regulatory concepts related to materials management, rather than having to extrapolate from historic studies or other jurisdictions. Taken together, this will create an opportunity to foster policy and programmatic enhancements grounded in objectively verifiable principles.

Section 4. Budget Narrative

Proposed Budget

Task 1: Cooperative

Agreement Oversight

Amount

Task 2: Program

Enhancement

Amount

Task 3: Program

Activities

Amount

Total

Personnel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Fringe ([%] of Personnel) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Travel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Contractual $0.00 $0.00 $733,568.00 $733,568.00

Other (Subawards, Participant Support Costs) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Indirect $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 $733,568.00 $733,568.00

Budget Description

The Illinois EPA will utilize $733,568.00 to hire a contractor to conduct the statewide waste characterization. These costs are reasonable because the contract will be awarded competitively under the

Illinois Procurement Code and other applicable federal law and the figure is consistent with similar awards issued by other states, when adjusted for Illinois’s population. Price will be one factor in determining which consultant offers the best value for the project.

Task 3 Contractor $733,568.00

TOTAL CONTRACTUAL: $733,568.00

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .