IFIB-17-29_Standard_QA_1.doc
DOC document 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- IFIB-ACT-SACT-17-29
- Issued by
-
NATO HQ Supreme Allied Commander
About this file
Commonly asked questions about this solicitation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Proposal Number:
Reference:
Date of Issue:
The following questions were raised with respect to subject IFIB/RFP. Responses are to provide clarification.
| Question |
| Response |
| Will you consider the 10% HUBZone Price Evaluation Preference allowed under FAR 19.1307(c)? |
| Unfortunately, NATO ACT contracting rules do not fall under the FAR, therefore no special considerations or discounts will be given to any particular group. |
| Are there any incumbents previously providing this work? If there are, could you please provide the contractor and contract numbers associated? |
| Yes, previous contract was awarded under IFIB-14-12 to C2 Technologies. |
| Is it required to be on-site to develop the courses? |
| Per the solicitation, under 10. Place of Performance: The contractor is expected to perform the majority of the required work at their location, however some development work maybe required at HQ SACT in Norfolk, VA, U.S.A but this could be covered by video teleconference in most cases. |
Does an offeror need to possess a facility clearance to perform the work?
Yes, per the solicitation a vendor is required to retain a NATO Secret clearance.
IFIB 17-29
Q&A 1
05 Oct 2017
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .