ID09180060-RFI-Q&As-09.11.18.pdf

PDF 173 KB Posted

Attached to
Administrative and Technical Services
Solicitation number
ID09180060
Issued by

About this file

RFI Q&As

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ID09180060-RFI-Amendment2.pdf PDF
ID09180068-RFI-Q&As-08.23.18.pdf PDF
ID09180060-RFI.pdf PDF
ID09180060-Draft-PWS.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ID09180060-RFI Q&As Page 1 of 1

Questions and Answers (Q&As)

Date: September 11, 2018 Refer To: ID09180060

From: Ms. Lynda Luo, Contracting Officer (FAS)

Subject: Questions and Answers (Q&As)

To: All Interested Respondents

The following question regarding Client Order ID ID09180060 was submitted, the Government response is noted in blue:

1. In response to RFI ID09180060 Amendment 2 dated 9/7/18, [interested vendor] requests confirmation that the Government will accept the past performance/experience of a subcontractor teammate vs. that of the Prime Contractor/Lead in the completion of RFI Amendment 2 Sections II: Capabilities/Feedback and Section III: Experience.

If this interpretation is incorrect, please advise.

This interpretation is incorrect. The Government is seeking for the RFI respondent’s experience performed as the prime contractor or subcontractor. The Government is not seeking experience from the RFI respondent’s subcontractor/teaming partner.

**End of Q&As.**

File details come from the government source that posted it.