ID05180024_Section_J_Attach_7_-_Capability_Demonstration_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf

SOW

Paragraph

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

Can the system support the intended DoD customers (does it rely upon/require services or infrastruture not available globally)?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.1 Are required User, Maintenance, Technical, and Operator Manuals available?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.2 Did the basic system include the minimum required components?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.2.6.1

Did the contractor offer the ability (based upon user requirement) to select/down-select from a variety of VSAT options in order to best support the specific user requirement?

4 or More VSAT Options = Blue 2-3 VSAT Options = Purple 1 VSAT = Green

3.2.8

Did the contractor demonstrate the Basic System's ability to operate on common AC power (e.g., less than 20Amp, 110-120VAC, 220- 240VAC, 50Hz, 60Hz)?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.2.9 Did the contractor demonstrate ease with the basic system's setup and meet required setup timelines?

9 minutes or less = Blue 10-20 minutes = Purple 21-40 minutes = Green 41-60 minutes = Yellow 61 minutes or more = Red

3.2.9.1 Were deployable containers sufficiently marked, effectively configured, and efficiently utilized?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

3.2.9.2 Were operator, user, and maintenance manuals easily accessible and intuitive?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

Section J Attachment 7 - Capability Demonstration Evaluation Criteria

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.2.9.3

Did the Basic System maximize logistical efficiency and operational effectiveness through consolidation of components, racks, patch panels, power management, red/black components/separation, etc.?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

3.2.9.4 Did the Basic System maximize logistical efficiency and operational effectiveness through consolidation of cables and connections, etc.?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

3.3.1 Does the system allow ingest of at least two (2) video sources including Standard Definition (SD) & High Definition (HD)?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.1 Can the system encode/transcode at least two

(2) video sources for output in the following formats: H.264, AVC, H.265, and HEVC?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.2 Does the system ingest and correctly encode/transcode analog and digital FMV formats along with the associated metadata?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.3 Can the system encode/transcode data in the following formats/resolutions/rates?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

3.3.4 and 3.3.6

Is the system modular and scalable and can it support ingest, encode/transcode, and transport of at least 4 concurrent HD FMV feeds (e.g., 30fps HD H.264)? (2 Mbps per up to a maximum of 25 Mbps)

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.3.5

Can the system organically downlink at least two

(2) DVB-S2 (GBS) carriers irrespective of the ISR data polarity and distribute the data for collocated users/operators/analysts?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.1

Input H.265/HEVC:

Main Profile Up to Level 4 (1080p 30fps) Transport Stream or RTSP Up to 10Mbps

CBR, VBR

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.2

Input H.264/AVC:

Baseline, Main, High Profile Up to Level 4.2 (1080p 60fps) Transport Stream Up to 20 Mbps

CBR, VBR

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.3

Input MPEG-2:

MainProfile@MainLevel (SD) MainProfile@HighLevel (HD) Transport Stream Up to 20 Mbps

CBR, VBR

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.4

Encoding Inputs:

Composite NTSC/PAL/PAL-M

SD-SDI SMPTE 259M

HD-SDI SMPTE 292M, 247M, 296M

Yes = Green

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.3.9.1.5

Encoding/Transcoding Outputs

H.265/HEVC:

Main Profile Up to Level 4 (1080p 30fps) Transport Stream Up to 6Mbps Transport Stream Shaping, VBR

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.6

Output H.264/AVC:

Main Profile Up to Level 4.2 (1080p 60fps) Transport Stream Up to 10Mbps Transport Stream Shaping, VBR

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.7

Output MPEG-2 Video:

Simple and Main Profile@MainLevel Up to 10Mbps Transport Stream Shaping, VBR Video Resolutions:

1920x1080p 60/59.94/50/30/29.97/25/24/23.98Hz 1920x1080i 60/59.94/50/30/29.97/25Hz 1280x720p 60/59/94/50/30/29.97/25Hz 720x480/576i 60/59.94/50Hz

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.8

Metadata Handling:

KLV supporting both Asynchronous and Synchronous KLV MISB ST0601.10 - UAS Datalink Set MISB ST0604.2 - Time Stamping

STANAG 4609

SMPTE 336M-2007 Data Encoding Protocol CoT to KLV Conversion Closed Captioning (EIA-608 & EIA-708)

Yes = Green

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.3.9.1.9

Input Metadata:

KLV to CoT over serial RS-232 KLV to CoT over IP KLV over HD-SDI

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.10

Metadata Processing:

CoT Relay Insertion and KLV edits KLV Pass-Through

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.11

Video Processing:

De-interlacing Down Scaling Aspect Ratio Preserved Configurable Frame Rate

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.9.1.12

Networking:

Single Program Transport Stream (SPTS) Unicast/Multicast (IGMPv3) TS over UDP RTSP (input only) Session Announcement (SAP)

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.10

Does the system provide an accredited mechanism to automate the configuration and control to increase ease of use and decrease set-up time?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.11 and 3.3.11.1

Does the system incorporate options for a local video server capability, optimally enabling management and analysis through a web interface?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.3.12 Does the system successfully support Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA)?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.12 Does the system provide an option for easily moving to Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) if required/desired?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.13 Does the system provide the capability to transition, with minimumal system changes, to emerging satellite modem technologies?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.14 Does the system provide for Ka (Commercial and Military) satellite usage?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.14 Does the system provide the option of using X (Commercial and Military) and Ku Bands?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.15

Does the system provide High Assurance Internet Protocol Encryption (HAIPE; NSA Type 1) for a maximum supported sensor data rate of 25Mbps?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.17

Does the system provide the ability to support C2 Services enclaves at the unclassified and collateral levels (NIPRNET and SIPRNET) with a port density capacity for at least five (5) user devices using added enclaves?

6 or more = 10 points 11 or More = Blue 6 to 10 = Purple 5 = Green 1 to 4 = Yellow 0 = Red

3.3.18 A maximum total system weight of 500 pounds?

Yes = Green

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.3.19

Does the system incorporate a Graphical User Interface (GUI) software solution for configuration and monitoring of equipment and connectivity, to include associsted modems, routers, switches, IP routes, and encoders to simplify Satellite Access Authorization and Gateway Access Authorization (SAA/GAA) information entry?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red N/A = N/A

3.3.20 Does the system support C2 services (NIPR/SIPR) to include hosting multiple enclaves with security boundaries?

3 or More = Blue 2 = Purple 1 = Green 0 = Red

3.3.21

Does the contractor enable the tactical user to leverage enterprise Network Operations (NetOps) capabilities to monitor and manage local system status and operation?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red N/A = N/A

3.4.1 Has the contractor identified required Bench Stock, Consumables, and Spares

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.4.1.1 Has the contractor proposed a sustainment plan, which includes a Recommended Spares and Parts List (RSPL)?

Yes = Green

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.4.1.3

Has the Contractor demonstrated a viable configuration management process to ensure tracking and accountability for system warranties, software licensing, and in order to support government mandated configuration management processes/systems (e.g., REMEDY, Engineering Review Boards {ERBs}, Configuration Control Boards {CCBs}, Risk Management Framework {RMF} Artifact production/delivery, etc.).

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red N/A = N/A

3.5

Has the contractor adequately demonstrated an ability to provide Just-In-Time, Pre-Deployment, and Re-Occurring Training, to include Training Manuals for students?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.5.1.2

Training Manuals: Has the contractor adequately demonstrated their ability to deliver detailed Training Manuals in applicable Geographical Combatant Command (GCC)-approved format(s)?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.5.1.1

Do Training Manuals cover fundamental information required to manage the systems, including: transrate/transcode component set-up/operations, network interface component set-up/operations, network router components set-up/operations and configuration management, initial break-fix repair (box swapping), basic troubleshooting techniques, and procedures for reporting failures and requesting factory/help desk support?

Yes = Green

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.6

Has the contractor demonstrated the ability to secure/offer system knowledgeable, globally-deployable Field Service Representatives (FSRs) capable of supporting: system installations; pre-deployment site-surveys; deployments; crew change out; and/or activities directed within specific Task Orders?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

3.6.1.3

Has the contractor demonstrated the ability of FSRs, during periods of continual deployment and when not on duty, to be telephonically available 24/7 and within 15 minutes of attempted contact? As well as availability for response and physical onsite support no more the 45 minutes of initial contact when deployed?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.6.1.4

Has the contractor demonstrated the ability of FSRs when not continually deployed to the classified forward operating location (e.g., USCENTCOM, USAFRICOM, and/or other COCOM areas of operation with the applicable location being disclosed on a need to know basis), to provide reach back support from another location (e.g. Ramstein AB, Germany)? As well as ensuring telephonic contact is possible within 30 minutes and if necessary, response to their appointed place of duty in no less than 1 hour to provide necessary higher level troubleshooting support and/or to facilitate classified communications?

Yes = Green

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

3.6.1.5 Does the contrator provide 24x7 access to Tier 3 level troubleshooting support?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.8 (and 3.2.6.1)

Does the system incorporate a suite of MILSATCOM certified (ARSTRAT requirements for WGS certification), or approved waiver, tactical Ka terminals to support a minimum throughput of 2 Mbps to a maximum of 25 Mbps?

4 or More VSAT Options = Blue 2-3 VSAT Options = Purple 1 VSAT = Green

3.10

Does the system have an existing ATO? And if not, is the contractor familiar with Risk Management Framework (RMF) requirements and demonstrated the ability to satisfy ATO requirements prior to new equipment installation/deployment requirements?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

3.11.1

Has the contractor adequately demonstrated the ability to provide Program Management capabilities for supported systems and installations?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

3.11.1 Did the contractor present sufficient knowledge of Program/Project: execution; scheduling;

status; and reporting?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

3.11.1

Has the contractor demonstrated current and relevant levels and breadth of acqusition and program management skills, experience, and technical expertise?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow

Description Grade: Color Scale Notes (if applicable)

SOW Evaluation Factors and Scoring

4.1

Has the contractor demonstrated the ability to provide fully-trained, professional, and customer-oriented personnel for reponsive, flexible, and cost-effective service?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

5.3

Does the contractor possess a Secret cleared facility and demonstrated the ability to secure and manage personnel security clearances, including compartments and Alternate Compensatory Control Measures (ACCM)?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

5.4 Does the contractor's Program and Project Managers, and at least one FSR, possess Top Secret SI access?

Yes = Green No = Red N/A = N/A

5.4

Has the contractor demonstrated how they would ensure and manage all personnel having signed and ensure adherence to any GCC-specific SF-312, Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) , as required?

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow Unacceptable = Red

Meets requirements listed in the SOW

Outstanding = Blue Good = Purple

Acceptable = Green Marginal = Yellow

SOW Requirement Scoring