Questions_and_Answers.docx

Section

I.

Yes, subcontracting plan is required for all proposed subcontractors which can be put in a separate Tab after the Merit Factors.

This statement is to let the contractors know that the work will have to be coordinated in a foreign environment with different language and work culture. There is no preference for Mexican Firms, Mexican National Architect or Engineers.

The quoted statement applies to both Part I and Part II of SF 330s; proposed subcontractor’s information needs to be incorporated into the Offeror’s submittal.

There are no minimum or maximum number of projects for Section F of the SF 330, rather a representative suite of projects to be listed here to demonstrate firm’s qualifications.

A full SF 330 with both Part I and Part II (all the sections filled in) followed by the Merit Factors in separate Tabs is required.

Thirty-three (33) pages will cover all of the Items within each Category.

12 point, Times New Roman Font applies to all texts excluding tables and graphics. Tables and graphics can be presented with smaller or different font texts provided they are easy to read.

No, Section F of the SF330 will show firm’s qualifications and capabilities. A separate Merit Factor 1 Tab will show the specific projects as per evaluation criteria of Merit Factor 1.

Please provide the information for Merit Factors in separate Tabs after Part II of SF 330.

SF 330 will show the firm’s qualifications and capabilities which will be referred to while evaluating the Merit factors. Additional information here refers to extra information beyond the page limit specified in the evaluation of each Merit Factor.

No, Section F of SF330 will show the firm’s general capability. For Merit Factor 2, projects need to be listed/described in a separate Merit Factor 2 Tab.

The “description of work shall not exceed ten (10) lines” is related only to Merit Factor 2, 1(g).

The maximum applies to the Category, not Item, therefore, a maximum of twenty five (25) projects for Categories 1 through 5, and maximum of eight (8) projects for Categories 6 through 9 are required.

Yes, as stated in Merit Factor 2, Item 2 on Page 4 of 5; however, two examples (2) can be included in one (1) page, reducing the total number of pages submitted.

II.

1. The J.02_Evaluation_Factors_for_IDIQ_Services.pdf references “the last page” for a sample response for format, but I was unable to locate this sample document.

Please disregard this sentence; sample response will not be provided as filling in instructions are provided with SF 330. The various sections of SF 330 and Merit Factors document need to be separated by Tabs to help during reviewing and evaluating process.

2. Typically, we develop a joint SF330, Part I, which includes all subcontractor information, but we do include a Part II for each subcontractor. Is this the expected response for this submittal as well?

Yes.

3. Are registrations/certifications required for the cost engineer and network/communications engineer?

Merit Factor 3 requires to provide information discussing qualified professional who are certified and highly trained in various disciplines listed in J.02 Evaluation Factors including cost engineer and network/communications engineer.

4. Any chance of an extension due to Memorial Day as many folks will take time off around the holiday?

Due 9 June 2017.

III.

1. How will the SF330 Section of Offeror’s submittals be scored?

While evaluating the Merit Factors, the reviewers will also refer to contents in SF 330.

a) Will SF330 Section E Resumes be scored as part of Merit Factor 3 - Professional Qualifications Necessary for Satisfactory Performance of A-E Services? If not, please identify how SF330 Section E Resumes will be evaluated.

Merit Factor 3 will include discussion of qualified professionals in the 20 key disciplines. The reviewer will refer back to SF 330 Section E resumes during reviewing process.

b) Will SF330 Section F Projects be scored as part of Merit Factors 1 and/or 2? If not, please identify how SF330 Section F Projects will be evaluated.

Suite of projects listed in Section F will provide Offeror’s qualification; these projects can also be part of Merit Factors description. During evaluation, the reviewers will refer back to the complete SF 330.

2. Please confirm that offeror’s projects shown in the SF330 Section F may include IDIQ contracts as well as individual Task Orders or stand-alone contracts.

Yes.

3. Please clarify whether the responses to Evaluation Factors are to be provided separate from the SF330 submittal (in its own binder) or if the responses to Evaluation Factors should be included as part of the SF330 Section H (included in the SF 330 binder)?

Merit Factors separated by Tabs can be placed after the Part II of SF 330 within the same binder.

4. If the responses to the Evaluation Factors are to be provided in a binder separate from the SF 330, please confirm the number of binders to be provided for the Evaluation Factor submittal. Is one binder required (as indicated in Item 6), or should five binders be provided (similar to the SF330 submittal requirement)?

One three ring binder is sufficient to include the SF 330, followed by the Merit Factors separated by Tabs.

5. What information is supposed to be included on the digital copy on CD? Just the SF330, or also the response to the Evaluation Factors?

Everything provided in the three ring binder needs to be included on CD.

6. What type of information is requested or recommended to be included in Section H of the SF330 submittal?

Any additional information not included in other sections of SF 330 or Merit Factors can be included in Section H to help the reviewer understand offeror’s capabilities.

IV.

1. Are bidders required to provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 as part of our proposal submission?

Yes, it needs to be placed after the Merit Factors separated by a Tab.

2. Are bidders required to provide a completed Section K- Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors or Respondents as part of our proposal submission?

Section K.01 needs to be included in a separate Tab named “Additional Information”.

3. Are bidders required to provide a completed Section L.01 as part of our proposal submission?

Section L.01 needs to be included in a separate Tab named “Additional Information”.

4. In Section M.01 of the Solicitation document, Merit Factor 5 is identified as Internal Projects. However, Attachment J.02 Evaluation Factors, indicates that Merit Factor 5 is Firm’s location and knowledge of the locality. Please clarify.

Section M.01 of solicitation changed to match Attachment J.02.

5. Regarding Attachment J.02 Evaluation Factors:

a. Please confirm the reference to the 12 point, Times New Roman applies only to the additional information portion of our submission.

12 point, Times New Roman Font applies to all texts excluding tables and graphics. Tables and graphics can be presented with smaller or different font texts provided they are easy to read.

b. Given the large amount of required information that must be provided within the specified page limits, may bidders use 10 point for tables and graphics?

Yes, as stated in answer to question 5a as long as it is easy to read.

c. Page 1 indicates that a format of sample responses is provided on the last page. However, none were provided. Please provide a format of sample responses to ensure our responses are provided in the format that will be evaluated.

Please disregard this sentence; sample response will not be provided as filling in instructions are provided with SF 330. The various sections of SF 330 and Merit Factors document need to be separated by Tabs to help during reviewing and evaluating process.

6. RFP Documents refer to three sections for this proposal: 1) SF 330; 2) Merit Factor Responses; and 3) Volume I. Can you please confirm the order of the requested sections in the binder?

There is no preferred order as long as sections are separated by Tabs and a Table of Contents is provided at the beginning.

V.

Change due date to 9 June 2017.

The quoted statement applies to both Part I and Part II of SF 330s; proposed subcontractor’s information needs to be incorporated into the Offeror’s submittal.

SF 252 is required with proposal.

VI.

1. Will USIBWC accept the org chart as an 11x17 size and if so, will it count as 2 pages?

Use 8.5 inch X 11.0 inch size paper for all your responses.

2. Do the font and margin requirements apply to all SF330 sections or just the five Merit Factors?

The font and margin requirements apply to both SF 330 as well as Merit Factors. However for tables and graphics, smaller font size can be used as long as it is easy to read.

3. Would the USIBWC consider a smaller and/or different font other than 12 pt Times New Roman acceptable for tables and exhibits?

For tables and graphics, smaller font size can be used as long as it is easy to read.

4. The RFP states that SF 330's must also be submitted for all proposed subcontractors. Does USIBWC expect a SF330 Part I and II for all subs or just a Part II for each subcontractor?

Please provide the subcontractor’s information in both Part I and Part II of SF 330 along with the Offeror’s information.

5. Is there a backlog of projects for the new contract and if so, what is the magnitude of the projects expected in the first year of the contract?

Number of projects expected can’t be determined now as it depends on project priority and availability of funds.

6. Does the USIBWC expect to see offerors identify geotechnical testing subcontractors under this contract?

Yes, if you plan on subcontracting these services.

1-4 Document Code image1.jpg