J.02_Evaluation_Factors_for_IDIQ_Services.pdf
PDF 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Architect-Engineering Services IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- IBM17R0004
About this file
J.02 Evaluation Factors
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_and_Answers_II.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions_and_Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| IBM17R0004_M001_A&E_IDIQ.pdf | ||
| J.02_Revised_Evaluation_Factors_for_IDIQ_Services.pdf | ||
| IBM17R0004_A&E_IDIQ.pdf | ||
| J.01_FY18_IDIQ_A-E_Services_SOW.pdf | ||
| J.03_SF330-16a.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION FACTORS
FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES
INSTRUCTIONS
Evaluation will be based on the Merit Factors found in the subsequent pages in descending order of importance. Merit Factor 1 is of highest importance, followed by Merit Factor 2, and so forth. Each Merit Factor is then divided into Categories that are also listed in descending order of importance.
Hence, Category 1 under each Merit Factor is of highest importance, as is Item (a) under each Category.
Unless noted otherwise, the responses shall be submitted as follows:
1. All responses shall be in 12 point, Times New Roman Font.
2. For Merit Factor 1, each offeror shall submit a maximum of one (1) page response per Item under each Category. For Example, Category 1 (Studies, analysis, and design of hydraulic structures) – A maximum of one (1) page for each Item (Levees, River Channels, Dams, etc…) shall be submitted. Each Item shall not exceed the one (1) page and will not be read and evaluated past the one (1) page requirement.
3. For Merit Factors 2 through 5, each offeror shall submit a maximum of one (1) page response per Category under each Merit Factor, unless otherwise noted. Each Category response shall not exceed the one (1) page requirement and will not be read and evaluated past the one (1) page requirement.
4. In each response page, the Merit Factor, Category, and Item shall be included followed by the response.
5. The responses to the Evaluation Factors shall be submitted in one (1) three ring binder and shall be in the same sequential order as provided. All Merit Factors shall be separated with a tab and all pages within the Merit factor shall be numbered in the following manner: x of xx.
6. Margins shall have the following minimum dimensions: Left 1 inch, Right 0.75 inch, Top
0.4 inch, and Bottom 0.5 inch
Responses that are not in the format specified shall be set aside and shall not be evaluated. There will be no exceptions. Refer to the last page for a format of sample responses.
The Scoring for each Merit Factor is as follows:
Merit Factor 1 = 53 points Merit Factor 2 = 28 points Merit Factor 3 = 10 points Merit Factor 4 = 6 points Merit Factor 5 = 3 points
EVALUATION FACTORS
FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES
MERIT FACTOR 1 – Specialized experience and technical competence for satisfactory performance of Architect-Engineering Services. If no experience is listed on a particular item, it will be considered as no experience and will be subject to receive zero (0) points. Demonstrate experience in each of the following (53 points):
1. Studies, Analysis, and Design of hydraulic structures (13 Points)
a. Dams (4 Points)
b. Levees (3 Points)
c. Floodwalls ( 3 points)
d. River Channel (1 point)
e. Canals (1 point)
f. Culverts (1point)
2. Analysis of Hydraulic and Hydrologic Systems (9 Points)
a. Ground and Surface water studies (3 Points)
b. Dam Break (3 Points)
c. Reservoir Capacity (1 point)
d. Flood Routing (1 point)
e. Sediment Transport Studies and Modeling (1 point)
3. Studies, Analysis, and Design of Wastewater Treatment Plants (5 points)
a. Upgrade to existing wastewater treatment plants required for permit compliance and/or capacity increases (3 points)
b. Advanced Primary Treatment (1 point)
c. Secondary Treatment (1 point)
4. Studies, Analysis of Geotechnical Support Requirements (5 points)
a. Seepage Analysis (3 points)
b. Slope Stability (1 point)
c. Design of de-watering systems (1 point)
5. Studies, Analysis and Design of Civil Works (5 points)
a. Buildings - Administrative, Storage, and Maintenance Buildings. Discuss components and requirements involved (Mechanical, Fire Protection – facility and equipment, Electrical, Plumbing, Structural, Communications, Physical and Environmental controls for information systems, Security, Safety Systems, LEED Certification, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)). (2 points)
b. Ancillary Civil Structures, i.e. Water towers, sewage lift stations, parking structures, wash racks, exterior lighting, retaining walls, fencing, and utilities infrastructure. (1 point)
c. Energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction and use of recovered materials in design of any civil works projects. (1 point)
d. Feasibility studies and cost benefit analysis for civil works. (1 point)
6. Studies, Analysis and Design of Hydroelectric Plant Systems, specifically for rehabilitation and upgrades of existing plants (4 points)
a. Instrumentation and Controls (2 points)
b. Automation (1 point)
c. Structural (1 point)
7. Studies, Analysis and Design of Site Remediation (4 points)
a. Underground Storage Tanks (1 point)
b. Contaminated soil and ground water remediation (1 point)
c. Lead and Asbestos remediation (1 point)
d. Mold remediation (small buildings) (1 point)
8. Geographic Information System (GIS) (4 points)
a. Integrate hardware, software, and data for capturing, managing, analyzing, and displaying all forms of geographically referenced information. (4 points)
9. Preparation of Base Maps using and preparing the following (4 points)
a. Aerial Photography/Traditional Land Surveying (1 point)
b. Scanning vectorization and geo-referencing of historical maps (1 point)
c. Inundation Maps (1 point)
d. Light Detecting and Ranging (LIDAR) surveys (1 point)
MERIT FACTOR 2 – Past performance on contracts with Federal, State, and/or local government agencies and private industry in terms of quality of work, cost control, compliance with schedules, and managerial ability. (28 points)
1. Provide a list of projects performed during the last five (5) years similar in nature to the work described for each Category under Merit Factor 1. For Categories 1 through 5, a maximum of five (5) projects per Category shall be listed. For Categories 6 through 9, a maximum of two (2) projects per Category shall be listed. Each Project shall contain the following information (Note the one page maximum requirement does not apply to this Category, however additional information submitted other than what is requested will not be read and evaluated) (15 points):
a. Name of Contracting Agency/Owner
b. Contract Number if available
c. Contract Type
d. Total Contract Value (Original and Final Value)
e. Agency/Owner Contact Name and Telephone Number
f. Indicate if Contractor was Prime Contractor or Sub-Contractor.
g. Brief description of the work and how this work relates to the work outlined under this solicitation. This list, in conjunction with the Contractor Performance
Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), will be used for evaluation. The description shall not exceed ten (10) lines.
2. Provide one (1) example, for each Category 1 through 9 above, of past performance in quality of work, cost controls, compliance with performance schedules, and managerial abilities, demonstrating timely completion, reasons for any modifications to contract, and difficulties or issues with contract and resolution to each. Each example shall not exceed half (1/2) of one (1) page. (10 points)
3. Describe regional or national quality awards received during the past five (5) years that indicate the technical and engineering performance of the firm. (3 points)
MERIT FACTOR 3 – Professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of Architect-Engineering Services. (10 points)
1. Provide information discussing qualified professional who are certified and highly trained to include the following key disciplines: Project Manager, Civil Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Hydrologic Engineer, Hydraulic Engineer, Structural Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Central Office (network and communication) Engineer, U.S.
Green Building Council (USGBC) certified Leadership in Energy and Environmental (LEED) Accredited Professional, multi-disciplined security specialist, historical preservation specialist, Geophysicist, Cost Engineer, Hydro-geologist, Geologist, Surveyor, GIS Specialists, CADD Designer and CADD Operator, which shows consistency with this solicitation. The description shall include the number of personnel in each discipline. (Note that the one page maximum requirement does not apply to this Category, however additional information submitted other than what is requested will not be read and evaluated: The offerer shall not exceed two (2) pages in length.) (8 points)
2. Identify state registration and licensing for architects and engineers in CA, AZ, NM, and TX.
(1 point)
3. Provide information on contractor’s corporate structure, including regional and field office structure. (1 point)
MERIT FACTOR 4 – The firm’s capacity to accomplish the contract performance in the required time frame. (6 points)
1. Provide information on the firm’s capacity to accomplish work within a required period of time. In addition, from the projects listed in Merit Factor 2.(1), expound on one (1) project, where you were the Prime Contractor, detailing information on which there were significant delays and obstacles to complete the project yet the deliverable was submitted on time. (5 points)
2. Provide information on availability of equipment, facilities, and other resources needed to perform all required data analysis, design work, and preparation of drawings, specifications, studies, and assessments including, but not limited to, office and field equipment, computer hardware and software, specialized tools and equipment, and vehicles. (1 points)
MERIT FACTOR 5 – Firm’s location in the general geographical area of the project (CA, AZ, NM, and TX) and knowledge of the locality of the project. Note experience in dealing with local and regional issues to include economic, environmental, and binational along the US/Mexico border. (3 points)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .