IAM_Vendor_Evaluation_Scorecard.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Identity and Access Management (IAM) Solution
- Solicitation number
- 2026-RFP-133
- Issued by
- Polk County, Florida
About this file
This is a Vendor Evaluation Scorecard for the City of Lakeland's Identity and Access Management (IAM) Solution procurement in Florida. The City seeks an enterprise IAM solution to support approximately 2,500 workforce identities with centralized identity management, authentication, access control, lifecycle management, governance, and application integration capabilities. The RFP evaluation is structured in two potential phases, with Phase 1 being the initial evaluation and Phase 2 potentially including product demonstrations, presentations, and clarification sessions with top-ranked vendors. The project includes a budgetary estimate of $150,000, though specific response dates, due dates, site visits, and award dates are not detailed in this scorecard document.
The evaluation scorecard allocates 100 total points across five categories: Core IAM Functionality & Lifecycle Management (25 points), Technical Architecture & Integration (20 points), Security, Governance & Compliance (20 points), Implementation, Migration, Training & Support (15 points), and Pricing & Overall Value (20 points). Annual recurring licensing and required support costs must not exceed $150,000, with vendors required to provide clearly itemized first-year implementation and licensing costs as well as ongoing recurring fees. The technical requirements emphasize integration with PeopleSoft HRMS, Active Directory, Microsoft 365, endpoint management, and SIEM systems, along with support for applicable CJIS and Public Safety requirements. The current environment and incumbent vendor information are not provided in this scorecard.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Identity_and_Access_Management_(IAM)_Solution.pdf | ||
| Human_Trafficking_Affidavit.docx | DOCX document | |
| PSM_-_Contractor_Audit_Form.pdf | ||
| Indemnification_2026_Consultant.doc | DOC document | |
| Indemnification_2026_Vendor.doc | DOC document | |
| Indemnification_2026_Consultant_-_FDOT.docx | DOCX document | |
| Indemnification_2026_Contractor.doc | DOC document | |
| Indemnification_2026_Contractor_-_FDOT.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Vendor Evaluation Scorecard Total Possible Score: 100 Points
| Category |
| Weight |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Core IAM Functionality & Lifecycle Management |
| 25% |
| Single Sign-On, MFA and phishing-resistant authentication; directory services; Joiner-Mover-Leaver automation; provisioning/deprovisioning; access workflows; multi-domain management; identity governance; privileged, non-human, and emerging identity capabilities. |
| Technical Architecture & Integration |
| 20% |
| PeopleSoft HRMS, Active Directory, Microsoft 365, endpoint management, SIEM, internally developed applications, APIs, OAuth 2.0, webhooks, standards-based integrations, scalability, and identification of third-party or custom components. |
| Security, Governance & Compliance |
| 20% |
| Conditional Access, device trust, least privilege, audit logging and retention, governance reporting, encryption, privileged access controls, and support for applicable CJIS/Public Safety requirements. |
| Implementation, Migration, Training & Support |
| 15% |
| Phased migration approach, project management, testing, implementation assistance, training, knowledge transfer, post-go-live support, critical-incident SLAs, customer success, and relevant implementation experience/references. |
| Pricing & Overall Value |
| 20% |
| Pricing for approximately 2,500 workforce identities; first-year and recurring costs; implementation, migration, training, and support costs; required add-ons; growth pricing; licensing simplicity; scalability; and long-term value. Annual recurring licensing and required support should not exceed $150,000. |
Scoring Note: Detailed requirements in the RFP Requirements Tracker should be used as supporting criteria when assigning scores within each category. Any approved Deal Breaker requirements remain pass/fail gates.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .