2021.05.24 QAs 1-5 MUGU.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted

Attached to
Logistics aircraft and drone recovery services for NAWCWD, Pt Mugu, CA.
Solicitation number
HTC71121RR014
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a set of questions and answers regarding a solicitation for logistics aircraft and drone recovery services. The solicitation seeks commercial services to support air transportation of passengers and cargo within a 200 nautical mile radius of Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu in California, as well as rotary-wing transportation between Ventura County airports and San Nicolas Island and Santa Cruz Island within a 1.5 flight hour duration of Point Mugu. Drone recovery operations and range test support are required on the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division Sea Test Range and other ranges as specified. Minimum flight hours are listed for estimation purposes and payment will be made based on actual hours flown. Standby hours will be paid according to the contract rate. The contractor must comply with NIST SP 800-171 DoD assessment requirements regarding covered contractor information systems. US flag carriers and foreign flag carriers are defined for purposes of the solicitation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
2021.06.01 QAs 1-6 MUGU -.pdf PDF
HTC71121RR014 AMD 1.pdf PDF
Atch 03 Pricing Table Amd 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
2021.05.14 QAs 1-3 MUGU.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 05 - RFP Offeror Information Sheet.docx DOCX document
Atch 04 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Atch 01 PWS Pt. Mugu.pdf PDF
DD254-N63126-03022021-37322.pdf PDF
Atch 03 Pricing Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 02 Aircraft Information Sheet.docx DOCX document
HTC71121RR014 Solicitation.pdf PDF
Atch 06 - Basic Eligibility.docx DOCX document
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MUGU Q 1-3

NumberReferenceQuestionResponse
1Attachment 03 – Pricing Tablea. Please confirm whether the listed number of flight hours are all minimum guaranteed, and that the contractor will be paid this minimum regardless of actual utilization. Further, please confirm that hours flown or standby/delay time incurred in excess of these minimum listed hours will be charged at the unit price rate. Reference: 150 flight hours for FW Air Transport (4 Passengers), 200 flight hours for FW Air Transport (8 Passengers), 50 FW Aircraft Standby / Delay Time hours, 75 flight hours for RW Air Transport (3 Passengers), 300 flight hours for RW Air Transport (5 Passengers), 100 flight hours for RW Air Transport (9 Passengers), 150 flight hours for RW 500 lb. Drone Recovery, 50 flight hours for 2,500 lb. Drone Recovery, and 300 RW Aircraft Standby / Delay Time hours.No minimum guarantee exists for this requirement. Flying hours shown are estimated and payment will be made at actual hours. Standby hours will be paid at contract Aircraft Standby / Delay Time in accordance with PWS 1.3.2.4..
2Attachment 03 – Pricing Table and PWS Section 1.3.1, Page 1 (FW and RW Aircraft Specifications)a. Please confirm whether the mission types listed for RW and FW aircraft will be conducted concurrently, or whether the contractor could coordinate with USG to schedule flights to not conflict. This would allow the contractor to fulfill all mission types with one (1) RW aircraft and one (1) FW aircraft that are capable of performing all respective RW and FW mission requirements.FW & RW flights could be flown concurrently, for the same or different missions. Tasking may be for single or multiple aircraft.
3Reference PWS Section 1.2, Page 1, Paragraph 1Are contractor aircraft required to be based at a specific airfield?No specific field is required
4Reference DFARS clause 252.207-7012I do not see that FAR Clause in this Solicitation but rather 252.204-7012, which does not necessarily require the CMMC3 certifications. Is this missing FAR clause an oversight?The CMMC DFARS clause , 252.204-7021, “Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Requirement”, is NOT in contracts prior to 30 Sep 2025, unless approved by OSD/A&S, as OSD/A&S is taking a phased approach to implementation of this framework. However, DFARS provision 2252.204-7019, “Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements” and DFARS clause 252.204-7020, “NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements” has been added to the solicitation. Under this clause, the Contracting Officer will be required to verify the contractor has posted a summary level score of a NIST SP 800-171 DoD assessment to SPRS for covered contractor information systems.
5Reference Atch 5, Question 3This attachment asks if the Operator is a US “Flag Carrier”. The common definition of that is a Sovereign Airline that carries 30 or more passengers on international routes. While we are an “Air Carrier” under FAR 135, I don’t think we are a “Flag Carrier”.U.S. flag air carrier service is service provided on an air carrier which holds a certificate under 49 U.S.C. 41102 and which service is authorized either by the carrier's certificate or by exemption or regulation. For purpose of this solicitaion US flag carrier would include US owned and operated carriers. Foreign flag carrier would include foreign owned and operatied carriers.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .