Atch_7_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
SOCOM Fixed Wing Air Transportation
Solicitation number
HTC711-16-R-R018
Issued by

About this file

Atch 7 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 7 – Past Performance Questionnaire

HTC711-16-R-R018

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror submitting a response to USTRANSCOM solicitation number HTC711-16-R-R018 completes this section prior to sending to the Respondent.

A. Contractor Name: __________________________________________________________________________

B. Contract Title/Number: ______________________________________________________________________

C. Brief Description of Work Performed (include workload estimates):

D. Location (countries) where service was performed under this contract:_________________________________

E. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: _____ Prime or ______ Subcontractor (Mark one)

F. Contract Type: ___ Fixed Price ___ Cost ___ IDIQ ___ Single Award ___ Multiple Award

Other: ______________________________________________________________________________

G. Period of performance (month/year – month/year): ________________________________________________

H. Dollar Value (include per year cost and life cycle cost): _____________________________________________

SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

INSTRUCTIONS: The remaining sections are to be completed by Respondent.

The results of this survey will aid the Government in determining whether there is a reasonable expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the US Special Operations Command Fixed Wing Transportation Support effort in Afghanistan. Therefore, it is important the responses be candid, factual, and as complete as possible.

If you do not have knowledge of, or experience with, the contract referenced above, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who can provide the information. Also, if offeror holds or has held other relevant contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Questionnaires must be returned no later than 01 Mar 2016, to USTRANSCOM Acquisition Office via E-mail: norleska.hannah.civ@mail.mil and denise.e.cameron.civ@mail.mil. Please indicate “Performance Survey” in the subject. Note, this information is to be received directly from the respondent and will not be considered if received from the Offeror.

A. Respondent's name: __________________________________________________________________________

B. Respondent's title: ___________________________________________________________________________

C. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________________________

D. Respondent's phone number: ___________________________________________________________________

E. Respondent’s Email: _________________________________________________________________________

F. Description of Work Performed (include workload estimates). Note: If any of the information in Section A is incorrect, please provide the correct information here.

G. Was contract performance assessed in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)?

________ Yes ________ No

NOTE: The Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) may be reviewed for the referenced contract as well as responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

INSTRUCTIONS: Place a mark in the block that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

In responding to the survey, please justify and explain Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings. As the Respondent, you may be contacted to clarify comments or ratings. In order for the government to review and assess the contractor’s past performance rating, please use the following ratings to describe the offeror’s performance on your contract or project:

Exceptional (E) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to your company’s (or agency’s) benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

Very Good (VG) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to your company’s (agency’s) benefit. There were a few minor problems that the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Satisfactory (S) - Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal (M) - Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective or was not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory (US) - Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Unknown (U) - No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

Not Applicable (NA) – The requested information was not related to the referenced contract effort.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
US
M
S
VG
E
U
NA
A
Contractor’s performance in providing fixed wing passenger transportation services, including effective flight planning and execution.
B
Contractor’s performance in providing fixed wing cargo transportation services, including effective flight planning and execution.
C
Contractor’s performance in providing fixed wing combi (passenger and cargo) transportation services, including effective flight planning and execution.
D
Contractor’s performance in providing fixed wing aeromedical evacuation services, including effective flight planning and execution.
E
Contractor’s knowledge and experience in providing fixed wing airlift transportation service to airfields in remote and austere environments with unimproved dirt runways.
F
Contractor’s performance in meeting the contractually-established Operational Readiness rate (i.e., aircraft were available to fly missions as required).
G
Contractor provided airlift transportation service without loss of cargo.
H
Contractor provided airlift transportation service without damage to cargo.
I
Contractor provided airlift transportation service without loss of passengers.
J
Contractor provided airlift transportation service without injury to passengers.
K
Contractor scheduled maintenance on aircraft to ensure limited interruption of service.
L
Contractor personnel, including aircrew, demonstrated the appropriate education, experience, skill level, expertise and security clearance for the tasks required.
M
Contractor was flexible in responding to customer requirements.
2. OVERALL PERFORMANCE
US
M
S
VG
E
U
NA
A
Compliance of services, documents, and related deliverables to requirements specification.
B
Effective program/contract management.
C
Contractor effectively forecasted and controlled costs.
D
Overall performance of the contractor.

Rating Comments. Please discuss each response for which you indicated Marginal or Unsatisfactory performance in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

SECTION 4: NARRATIVE QUESTIONS

INSTRUCTIONS: Respond to the questions and provide explanations as necessary.

1. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations? ________ Yes ________ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)

2. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your most critical and demanding programs? If so, please explain why.

3. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .