Attachment 2- Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION COMMAND

508 SCOTT DR

SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE IL 62225-5357

MEMORANDUM FOR QUESTIONNAIRE POINTS-OF-CONTACT (POCs)

FROM: USTRANSCOM

508 Scott Drive-Bldg 1600 Scott AFB, IL 62225-5357

SUBJECT: Request for Source Selection Information

MAR 3 0 201Z

1. United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Directorate of Acquisition (TCAQ) is in the process of selecting a contractor for DODX Freight Car Repair and Maintenance Services, Request for Proposal HTC711-12-R-R002. Detailed information regarding this solicitation may be found at http://www.fedbizops.gov.

2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification ofthe Offeror's Past Performance on contracts which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort.

· · We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.

3. Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the attached questionnaire. Please provide your response directly to the Government by noJater th.an ~: 00 PM CST 26 April2012.

4. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and faxed to (618) 220-7518, Attention: Chad Hankins and Ainy Miller; or preferably completed electronically and emailed to Chad Hankins and Amy Miller at chad.hankins@ustranscom.mil and amy.miller@ustranscom.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become part of official source selection records.

5. Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be important to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

Attachment:

Past Performance Questionnaire

MICHELLE M. MENDEZ

Contracting Officer

Source Selection Information - See FAR 3.104 HTC711-12-R-R002

For Official Use Only Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In Attachment 2

Source Selection Information - See FAR 3.104

Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In

Past Performance Questionnaire

DODX FREIGHT CAR REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

USTRANSCOM

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the offeror’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings should include comments for any question rated higher or lower than Satisfactory. Rating definitions can be found at the end of the document. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, including these instructions, via fax or preferably e-mail to the address below.

USTRANSCOM/TCAQ-R

ATTN: Chad Hankins and Amy Miller 508 Scott Drive, Bldg. 1600

Scott AFB IL 62225-5357 Fax: 618-220-7918 E-mail: chad.hankins@ustranscom.mil and amy.miller@ustranscom.mil Phone: 618-220-6713 618-220-7078

Request response NLT 3:00 pm (CST) 17 May 2012

NOTE for Government Points of Contact: PPIRS may be reviewed for the offerors as well as responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Title of Work Performed:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Dollar value:

Period of Performance:

Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In Attachment 2

Source Selection Information - See FAR 3.104

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name: ____________________________________________________________________________

Position/Title: ______________________________________________________________________

Business Address: ___________________________________________________________________

Relation to Program: _________________________________________________________________

Phone: (DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________

FAX: (DSN) __________________________(Commercial) __________________________________

Other suggested points of contact:

Give a brief, general description of what the contractor was required to provide/deliver. Please note that if your response indicates a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

REMARKS: ___________________________________________________________________________

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE: Remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify category and question number.

1. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform Office Manual Rule 88 repairs?

Exceptional______Very Good______Satisfactory______Marginal______Unsatisfactory______Neutral______

REMARKS:

2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform heavy freight car repairs?

Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In Attachment 2

Source Selection Information - See FAR 3.104

3. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform tank car repairs, including qualification?

4. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform same site cleaning and repair of tank cars with a residue of JP-8?

5. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform Preventive Maintenance and Inspection Services in accordance with instructions supplied by car owners?

6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?

7. Would you award to this contractor in the future? Yes ___________ No____________

If “no”, why? _____________________________________________________________________________

RATING DEFINITIONS:

(1) Unsatisfactory – Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

(2) Marginal – Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

(3) Satisfactory – Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

(4) Very Good – Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the customer’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

(5) Exceptional – Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

(6) Neutral – No record of performance or the record is inconclusive.