DevMAC Reboot_Eval Criteria_final.pdf
PDF 456 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HT0038-24-X-XXXX
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document provides evaluation criteria for the Development Multiple Award Contract (DevMAC) Reboot opportunity issued by the Defense Health Agency. The criteria focus on effective communication and positive user experience. For communication, offerors should describe how they will promote alignment, transparency, engagement and shared ownership within project teams. For user experience, offerors should identify methodologies like heuristic evaluation, usability testing or checklists that will be used to evaluate products and demonstrate a positive experience. Industry feedback is requested on specific questions regarding demonstration of communication and user experience as part of proposals. Responses should be limited to one page or three PowerPoint slides per question and clearly identify any proprietary information. The closing date for informal discussions is not provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DevMAC Reboot_Final_v2_1.pdf | ||
| DevMAC Reboot_Final_v2.pdf | ||
| DevMAC Reboot_Final.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 RFI Response.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 RFI Respones.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Development Multiple Award Contract (DevMAC) Reboot Evaluation Criteria
December 2023
BLUF
PEO DHMS must maximize value in a rapidly evolving Healthcare Industry.
DevMAC will provide an ecosystem of “builders” with expanding capabilities to leverage the Federal Single-Record Ecosystem and drive innovation across the Health IT sector.
Evaluation Criteria
Goal of Evaluation Criteria
The Government is seeking industry feedback on industry’s ability to demonstrate:
1. Communication
2. User Experience
Communication
Effective Communication:
• Promotes alignment and transparency
• Fosters engagement, accountability, and shared ownership within the team
• Facilitate the exchange of feedback
• Enables the team to deliver high-quality outcomes, innovate, and adapt to change
COMMUNICATION
Request: How can industry demonstrate, as part of a proposal, effective and transparent communication?
Effective communication serves as the lifeblood that fuels collaboration, transparency, and successful project outcomes
User Experience
User experience is how a user feels while interacting with a product, system, or service.
Request: How can industry demonstrate, as part of a proposal, the product has a positive and quality user experience?
Heuristic EvaluationUsability TestChecklistA/B Testing
Some known methodologies for evaluating user experience.
Industry Feedback
Industry Feedback Requested
Question 1: How can industry demonstrate, as part of a proposal, effective internal and external communication?
Question 2: How can industry demonstrate, as part of a proposal, the product has a positive and quality user experience?
Submission:
• Cover Page: Includes Company Name, Cage Code, UIE, and Small Business concern (if applicable)
• Question #1: Limit to one (1) page in length, or three (3) power point slides
• Question #2: Limit to one (1) page in length, or three (3) power point slides
Proprietary information may be submitted; however, respondents are responsible for adequately marking proprietary, restricted or competition sensitive information contained in their response. If a submission is marked, it will be protected from disclosure outside of Government personnel, unless permission is granted for Government support contractors to view the material.
The following companies and individual employees are bound contractually by Organizational Conflict of Interest and disclosure clauses with respect to proprietary information, and they will take all reasonable action necessary to preclude unauthorized use or disclosure of an RFI respondent’s proprietary data. Responses MUST clearly state whether permission is granted allowing the support contractors identified below access to any proprietary information.
• Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
• ZYGOS Consulting,
• Andrew Morgan Consulting, LLC
• Greenlight Analytics, LLC
• Itero Group, LLC
Thanks for reviewing the DevMAC Reboot
For informal discussions regarding DevMAC Reboot and other opportunities, please visit our HIVE Hub: https://connect.bidscale.com/hive-hub
Official draft and RFP documents available on SAM.gov!
https://connect.bidscale.com/hive-hub
| Development Multiple Award Contract (DevMAC) Reboot�Evaluation Criteria |
| BLUF |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Goal of Evaluation Criteria |
| Communication |
| User Experience |
| Industry Feedback |
| Industry Feedback Requested |
| Slide Number 9 |
| Slide Number 10 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .