HT0011-24-R-0050_TST2_RFP_Att3_PPQ_2024.06.26_Final.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Training Support Team (J-7) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HT0011-24-R-0050
Issued by
Defense Health Agency

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for the Defense Health Agency solicitation HT0011-24-R-0050 for a Training Support Team.

The key details are: The solicitation is for a non-personal services contract to provide personnel support for e-Learning courseware development, instructional system design (ISD) projects, learning management system (LMS) administration, and training support. The contract objectives include standardizing and ensuring quality assurance of DHA e-Learning training products, providing LMS administration and training, and developing/maintaining web-enabled training courseware. The solicitation has a proposal due date of September 4, 2024 at 3:00 PM ET, and the period of validity for offers is 180 calendar days. Offerors must submit their best technical and price proposal initially, as the government does not intend to hold discussions but reserves the right to do so. The non-price proposal is limited to 40 single-sided pages across 4 technical subfactors. Points of Contact for the solicitation are provided.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

HT0011-23-R-0055

TRAINING SUPPORT TEAM

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance, and return via email no later than the proposal due date to Janet Lee, janet.h.lee4.civ@health.mil and Linda Walker, linda.m.walker38.civ@health.mil.

PART I:

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

PART II:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus options):

Description of Services Provided:

MARKET SEGMENT (Check all that apply)

General and/or Project Management Services
Professional and Management Development Training
Computer Systems Design Services
Custom Computer Programming Services
System Administration/ Administrative Management
Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
Marketing Research and Public Opinion Polling
Marketing Consulting Services

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

COMPLEXITY

Number of FTEs:

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Prime
Subcontractor
Teaming Partner
Joint Venture

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

Rating
Definition
(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(NA) Not Applicable
Unable to assess the area.

(CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Understood the Government's requirements and determined the best method for addressing them IAW contract Terms & Conditions (T&C)

Maintained an effective quality control program and processes and adhered to specifications and standards of good workmanship (i.e., commonly accepted technical, professional, instructional, training, etc. standards) to prevent inaccurate, defective or non-compliant services and deliverables (e.g., reports, data, and project deliverables)

Developed effective training products through the process of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation, for a variety of adult audiences

Administered a Learning Management System including the planning, guiding, managing and delivering of training events in a variety of settings, e.g., classrooms, web, and on-site production facilities

If other than “Satisfactory,” please explain how performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

(CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided performance management and control to ensure daily operations/ tasks/ requirements and quality deliverables were completed on time and IAW contract T&C

Established and achieved future milestones IAW contract T&C

Provided timely notification requiring Government action using effective written and oral communications skills to communicate effectively with team members, subject matter experts (SMEs), stakeholders, the COR and Government leads

Provided helpdesk support to address and resolve issues promptly

If other than “Satisfactory,” please explain how performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

(CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Employed management practices, policies and procedures that contributed positively to execution of all tasks IAW contract T&C

Maintained customer satisfaction, quality, timeliness, and responsiveness in daily operations/ tasks/ requirements and deliverables IAW contract T&C

Timely provided for the necessary technical expertise to subordinates, developed corrective actions and directed resources to address issues when/if needed, and communicated relevant information to impacted program elements

Provided qualified Leads/Managers and staffing and ensured that positions requiring qualified personnel remained filled IAW contract T&C (i.e., during transition-in/out phases, full contract performance, or Key Person/ staff replacements or substitutions)

Awarded and managed Subcontracts effectively, selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing personnel, when necessary

If other than “Satisfactory,” please explain how performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

(CPARS “Compliance” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Complied with applicable Federal, DoD, Agency and industry policies, procedures, regulations, and codes (e.g., technical/ technological, privacy protection, data management, labor, financial, safety, etc.) to accomplish tasks/ requirements and deliverables IAW contract T&C

Adhered to or complied with adult learning and e-learning principles, models, theories, tools and methodologies to create, develop, design, evaluate, analyze and implement effective training/ instructional products and materials (e.g., Knowles Principles of Adult Learning Theory, SCORM, ADDIE model, Kilpatrick’s Four Level Evaluation Model, storyboards, Adobe Captivate, Articulate Storyline, 508 compliance) as applicable

If other than “Satisfactory,” please explain how performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Yes
No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Yes
No

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments

Provide additional comments on the Contractor’s performance not requested/provided above:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: _______________________________________

Title: _____________________________________________

Telephone: ________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this Offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .