Attachment J.5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.xls

XLS spreadsheet 41 KB Posted

Attached to
Advanced Imaging Technology - Second Generation (AIT-2) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security Transportation Security Administration

About this file

Attachment J.5 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Advanced Imaging Technology - Second Generation (AIT-2), newest first.
File Type Posted
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011 AIT-2 Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.3_Price_Evaluation_Template_29_March_2012.xls XLS spreadsheet
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011 Amendment 0003 - AIT-2.pdf PDF
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011 AIT 2 RFP - Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment J.1 - CDRLs and DIDs.zip ZIP file
Attachment J.3 Price Evaluation Template 14 March 2012.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment J.4 - Past Performance Data.pdf PDF
Attachment J.8 TSA RMA Guide for OST Version 1.0.pdf PDF
Attachment J.1 CDRLs and DIDs.zip ZIP file
Attachment J.6 AIT-2 Self Certification Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment J.7 Labor Qualifications.pdf PDF
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011 AIT-2 RFP 02.21.12.pdf PDF
Attachment J.3 Price Evaluation Template.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment J.1 CDRLs and DIDs.zip ZIP file
Attachment J-7 Labor Qualifications.pdf PDF
Attachment J.5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment J.4 - Past Performance Data.pdf PDF
HSTS04-12-R-CT2011 AIT-2 RFP 02.21.12.pdf PDF
Attachment J.8 TSA RMA Guide for OST Version 1.0.pdf PDF
Attachment J.3 Price Evaluation Template.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

AIT-2 Solicitation - HSTS04-12-R-CT2011
Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment J.5)
OFFEROR FILLS OUT THESE BLOCKS (GREEN)
OFFEROR'S REFERENCE FILLS OUT THESE BLOCKS (YELLOW), THEN EMAILS FORM DIRECTLY TO
POLLY.HALL@DHS.GOV AND LANCE.NYMAN@DHS.GOV
1. Name/Address of Contractor:
Company Name:
Division Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Province/Country:
CAGE Code:
DUNS+4 Number:
FSC:
NAICS Code:
2. N/A
3. Period of Performance Being Assessed:
4. Contract Number:
5. Contracting Office:
6. Location of Contract Performance:
7a. Contracting Officer:
7b. Phone Number:
8a. Contract Award Date:
8b. Contract Effective Date:
9. Contract Completion Date:
10. N/A
11. Awarded Dollar Value:
12. Current Contract Dollar Value:
13. _ _Competitive ___Non-Competitive
14. Contract Type: ___FFP ___FPI ___FPR ___CPFF ___CPIF ___CPAF _ _ OTHER MIXED/OTHER:
15. Key Subcontractors and Effort Performed:
Subcontractor name and CAGE:
16. Program Title and Phase of Acquisition:
17. Contract Effort Description:
Small Business Utilization
Does this contract include a subcontracting plan?
Is small business subcontracting under this contract included in a comprehensive small business subcontracting plan?
Is small business subcontracting under this contract included in a commercial small business subcontracting plan?
Date of last Individual Subcontracting Report (ISR) / Summary Subcontracting Report (SSR):
18. Evaluate the following Areas:Past RatingCurrent RatingTrend
Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal or UnsatisfactoryExceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal or UnsatisfactoryN/A, + or -
a. Quality of Product or Service
b. Schedule
c. Cost Control
d. Business Relations
e. Management of Key Personnel
f. Utilization of Small Business
g. Other Areas:
(1):
(2):
(3):
(4):
(5):
(6):
(7):
(8):
19. N/A
20. Assessing Official Narrative:
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
SCHEDULE:
COST CONTROL:
BUSINESS RELATIONS:
MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
RECOMMENDATION: Given what I know today about the Contractor's ability to execute what they promised in their proposal, I [FILL IN THE BLANK FROM THE CHOICES BELOW*] award to them today given that I had a choice
* - Definitely Would Not, Probobaly Would Not, Might or Might Not, Probably Would, Probably Would Not
Utilization of Small Business:
Other Areas:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Assessing Official Name
Assessing Official Title
Assessing Official Phone #
Assessing Official Email Address

Sheet2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .