HSHQW8-17-R-00004_-_P1.pdf

(x)

HSHQW8-17-R-00004

x x copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

Auburn WA 98001 Attn: Rachel Kalac

OPO/FPS/WEST CCG/R8F

400 15th Street SW Ofc of Procurement Operations - FPS U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security NPPD/FPS/West CCG/Region 8

Auburn WA 98001 400 15th Street SW

OPO/FPS/WEST CCG/R8F

Office of Procurement Operations Federal Protective Service U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security NPPS/FPS/West CCG Region 8

09/20/201700001

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

09/20/2017

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Remove the existing Attachment 4, Past Performance Questionnaire, and replace with the revised Attachment 4. Delete pages 336-340/568 of the RFP Package and replace with the attached replacement pages 336-340. Pages 336-340 can be found in the third attachment of the RFP Package labeled: 'HSHQW8-17-R-00004 - RFP Package 3 of 4'.

2. The due date for questions remains unchanged; questions are due no later than 1400PST on

10/23/2017.

3. The due date for proposals remains unchanged; proposals are due not later than 1700PST

Continued ...

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Paul Metzger

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

2 7

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

HSHQW8-17-R-00004/00001

on 11/06/2017.

4. There are no other changes as a result of this amendment.

DO/DPAS Rating: NONE

Period of Performance: 04/01/2018 to 03/31/2023

****Offerors are reminded and encouraged to completely and thoroughly examine all elements of the RFP Package and all amendments that may be issued.****

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528

December 2013 Version

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: HSHQW8-17-R-00004

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE: __________________

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for Protective Security Officer services at various Federal buildings located throughout the states of Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.)

respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, please email to rachel.d.kalac@hq.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please call Rachel Kalac at 253-876-6838. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: _____________________________________

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS:_________________________________________

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS: _________________________________________

ANNUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER

HOURS:_________________________________________

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we determine any similarities to this contract:

REVISED, P00001 - 09/28/2017

December 2013 Version

QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. How consistent is the Contractor in providing required staffing at each post of duty?

Comments:

2. How consistent is the Contractor in providing employees who report to duty properly groomed, uniformed, and equipped?

Comments:

3. How consistent is the Contractor in keeping training records, certifications, and related documentation complete, accurate, and current?

Comments:

4. Discuss the overall level of professionalism, attentiveness, and bearing of the Contractor's workforce.

Comments:

December 2013 Version

5. How effective is the Contractor in identifying potential problems and resolving them on his own?

Comments:

6. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to him by owner and tenant representatives?

Comments:

7. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.

Comments:

8. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project

Comments:

December 2013 Version

9. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to seamlessly transition or phase-in under a newly awarded contract (if applicable):

Comments:

10. Discuss the Contactor’s ability to provide the level of supervision sufficient to ensure effective performance by the productive Protective Security Officers over the course of the Contract.

Comments:

11. Did this contract require the contractor to submit a subcontracting plan? If so, has the contractor been making a good faith effort to meet the subcontracting goals contained within the plan? (NOTE: The individual completing this questionnaire may need to contact the cognizant contracting officer in order to ascertain whether the contractor is meeting subcontracting goals.)

12. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

December 2013 Version

13. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. _____ Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.

b. _____ Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.

c. _____ Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

Your Name: ______________________________ Your Position: ______________________________ Company: ______________________________ Telephone No: ______________________________ Fax: ______________________________ E-mail address: ______________________________