About this file

Attachment J.8(D)

View the file

Other files

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SEDl FFRDC Attachment 5-8

Department of Homeland Security Contractor Past Performance Survey

Your Name & Title:

Your Organization Address:

Your Contact Info: Phone: Email:

Contractor's Name:

Contractor's Address:

Contract Value & Period of Performance:

I Contract Number - Title: 1 I Contract T v ~ e : 1

Questions: (Please place an "X" in the appropriate box) Su

Technical Qt~ality - Reports: Was the report/deliverable format logical and consistent? Were assumptions proposed model and/or test? Were sensitivity analyses conducted to show clear weaknesses and s s of the model and test? Are the model and test base assumptions etrics established before the modeUtest?

Tech~~ical Quality - Innovation: How would you rate the contractor staff on this task in terms

Technical Quality - Program Framework: Did this contractor provide direction and insight I 1 Responsiveness: Did the contractor keep you informed during the conduct of the program? Did I I I ( the contractor help your organization corroborate across your Agency? Did the contractor I contractor personnel work cooperatively and

I Val>e: Did the product help your efforts to strategically improve agencies programs?

Consistency with Work Statement: Was this contractor's work consistent with the work defined in the agreed-upon scope of work'?

Overall Customer Satisfaction: Were contractor personnel familiar with your needs'? Was the

;QR~'?, Homeland @ Security

SEDl FFRDC Attachment 5-8 HSHQDC-09-R-0008(D)

Legend: NA Not Aoplicable Su Su~er ior : Based on an offeror's past performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Sa Satisfaetow: Based on an offeror's past performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

IJ Unsatisfactory: Based on an offeror's past performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

N Neutral: No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance rating. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for thc offeror or key team membersisubcontractors or their key personnel. This is ncither a negative or positive assessment.

Comments: (Please provide a description of the work and contractor results)

Please submit your comments as an email attachment to:

Department of Homeland Security

RFP HSHQDC-09-R-00008

Attn: www.fedconnect.net

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .