Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted

Attached to
Maintenance and Deactivation (MDC) of Temporary Housing Units (THUs) in Minot, ND in support of DR-1981-ND
Solicitation number
HSFE08-12-R-1029
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions and Answers regarding RFP HSFE08-12-R-1029.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
52.212-2 Addendum - Evaluation - Commercial Items —
Attachment B - QASP.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - PWS.docx DOCX document
Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment D - Wage Determination.docx DOCX document
52.212-1 Addendum - Instructions to Offerors.docx DOCX document
HSFE08-12-R-1029.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - PWS.docx DOCX document
52.212-1 Addendum - Instructions to Offerors.docx DOCX document
52.212-2 Addendum - Evaluation - Commercial Items —
HSFE08-12-R-1029 MDC RFP.docx DOCX document
Attachment B - QASP.docx DOCX document
Attachment D - Wage Determination.docx DOCX document
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT C – Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), FEMA, recently released a Request for proposal for Maintenance and Deactivation of Temporary Housing Units. Offerors were asked to provide information on contracts similar in nature, size and complexity to the present requirement on which they had performed in the past. An offeror may submit you as a reference for past performance. (See blocks 1 & 2 below).

We need your opinion on how well the contractor performed on this contract. Please fill out the attached questionnaire and return it to the offeror in an envelope both taped and signed across the seal. DHS/FEMA may contact you to clarify or verify any information provided.

Your input will be confidential. Please note your comments will be used to form the basis for evaluation of this offeror. Thank you in advance for your assistance. If you have any questions please contact Bryan Boland, Contracting Officer at (701) 221-5126 or by email at bryan.boland@dhs.gov.

CERTIFICATION

By law, the Government will not disclose the names of individuals providing reference information during discussions with the contractor identified in Block 1 below.

Block 1. Contractor | Block 2. Contract Name/Identifier | I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

Evaluator’s Printed Name Title

Evaluator’s Mailing Address (Agency, Bldg/Room, Street, City, State, Zip)

________________________ __________________________________________
Evaluator’s SignatureDatePhoneFax

INSTRUCTIONS

Two forms are provided to document your opinion: 1) Performance Rating Form; and 2) Supplemental Comment Form. Please fill out each form in accordance with the instructions provided on each. Please use the following standards in arriving at your rating:

Outstanding - Contractor, on balance, exceeded client expectations and requirements Satisfactory - Contractor, on balance, met customer expectations and requirements Unsatisfactory - Contractor, on balance, was either marginal or did not meet customer expectations and requirements Other - The element is not applicable, no data has been obtained, or additional comments are provided

Performance Element
Outstanding
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Other/Comments

1. QUALITY OF SERVICES: The contractor provided high quality of service and performed successfully.

2. EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES: The contractor deployed, in a timely manner, the proper amount and type of personnel, facilities and other resources to support the project. Use of subcontractors was appropriate in supporting the project.

3. COMMUNICATION: The contractor worked and communicated well with client management, staff, and contracting officials as well as with his or her own staff and subcontractors.

4. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: The contractor planned and proposed realistic schedules, successfully monitored performance and completed work on time.

5. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: The contractor exhibited a commitment to customer satisfaction and achieved customer satisfaction.

6. RESPONSIVENESS AND ATTENTIVESNESS: The contractor exhibited reasonable and cooperative behavior in response to client changes, criticism/rejection of contract deliverables and in detecting and correcting errors, poor performance, and other problems.

7. COST CONTROL: The contractor successfully planned and proposed realistic costs and monitored performance, and consistently operated at or below budget.

8. SUBCONTRACTING PLAN: The contractor put forth good faith effort in meeting it small and disadvantaged business goals.

YES
NO

9. Given the choice would you do business with this contractor again?

10. Did either you or the contractor have to resort to litigation to resolve problems?

Supplemental Comment Form

Please provide any additional comments regarding your performance element ratings in the appropriate spaces below. Please add additional pages as necessary.

Performance Element #1, Quality of Services:

Performance Element #2, Effective and Efficient Use of Resources:

Performance Element #3, Communication:

Performance Element #4, Timeliness of Performance:

Performance Element #5, Customer Satisfaction:

Performance Element #6, Responsiveness and Attentiveness:

Performance Element #7, Cost Control:

Performance Element #8, Subcontracting Plan:

Question #8, Given the choice would you do business with this contractor again?:

Question #9, Did either you or the contractor have to resort to litigation to resolve problems?:

Additional Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .