SOLICITATION_AMENDMENT_0002_HSCGG117BPFA002_WAESCHE_HALL_REPLACE_ROOF_USCG_ACADEMY _PROJECT__5753515.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. DATE

3 NOV 2016

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

Contracting Officer USCG Civil Engineering Unit 475 Kilvert St. Suite 100 Warwick, RI 02886

Same as block #6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., STREET, COUNTY, STATE AND ZIP CODE)

THIS AMENDMENT MUST BE

ACKNOWLEDGED WITH YOUR BID

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

HSCGG1-17-B-PFA002

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10/04/2016

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

THE BID OPENING DATE REMAINS 2:00 P.M. TUESDAY 08 NOVEMBER 2016

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted or

(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE REFERENCED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET

FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (SPECIFY TYPE OF MODIFICATION AND AUTHORITY)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

1. The solicitation referenced in Block #9A is hereby amended as follows:

a. Page 2 of this amendment provides questions and answers in response to requests for information received to date.

b. A total of five (5) test reports are referenced herein and are provided as attached.

2. The bid opening date remains 2:00 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, 8 November 2016.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or Print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TERESA LAMPHERE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

15C. DATE SIGNED

16B UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

16C. DATE SIGNED

11/3/2016

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

HSCGG1-17-B-PFA002

Amendment 0002 11/3/2016

Question 1:

My firm conducted a site visit today at the above referenced project and we are interested in bidding on the project. In our discussion with LT. Luke Mayotte, he mentioned that a core cut was done previously. Please advise on how we can get the results of that core cut and whether or not a formal RFI is required.

Answer 1:

Roof cuts and testing were done in 2011 and 2013. Test results are provided as attached. The attached test results contain the raw data that the notes on the drawings are based on. In the 2011 test the flashing tar was found to be asbestos containing. All other samples of roofing material tested negative for asbestos. 2013 test of roofing material tested negative for asbestos flashing - tar was not tested. Per Bid drawing A-100, Demolition General Note 3, "Black mastic on flashing contains asbestos..." Also Bid drawing G-001, Cover Sheet, the project description notes "The existing modified bitumen roof membrane and silver coating do not contain asbestos. However the black tar on the metal counter flashing does contain asbestos and shall be removed and properly disposed of by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor."