Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
In Haul Winch Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HSCG8516QP4500A
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security US Coast Guard

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to In Haul Winch, newest first.
File Type Posted
Specification_change_4_inhaul_Winch.pdf PDF
D-000-0100.docx DOCX document
Amendment_3.docx DOCX document
Sol_Amendment_2.docx DOCX document
Sol_Amendment_1.docx DOCX document
R-573-2020_change_3.docx DOCX document
5330_15_In_haul_winch-JA_signature_page_CPACA_Signed.pdf PDF
5318_21_HSCG85-16-Q-P4500A__IN-HAUL_HYDRAULIC_WINCH.docx DOCX document
JA_MacTaggart_Scott_and_Company_Ltd_Redacted.pdf PDF
Delivery_Schedule_In-haul_winch_rev_2_(vendor).doc DOC document
R-573-2020_change_2.doc DOC document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. COAST GUARD

SURFACE FORCE LOGISTIC CENTER (SFLC), CPD-2 IBCTPL

300 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 600

NORFOLK, VA 23510-9112

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

I. INSTRUCTIONS

The company (i.e., contractor) that sent you this questionnaire intends to submit an offer in response to a U.S. Coast Guard solicitation and has identified you as a reference to validate their performance. This PPQ must be completed by the person most familiar with the contractors’ performance on a present or previous contract and then submitted directly to the U.S. Coast Guard by the person completing the PPQ. Please DO NOT sends the completed PPQ to the contractor being evaluated. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. We are thanking you in advance for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire.

Please submit the completed form to the Contract Specialist via one of the following methods: (1) E-mail to Kathryn.e.stark@uscg.mil or (2) E-mail to Rebecca.l.koger Attn: CPD-2 IBCTPL

Please contact the Contract Officer, Kathryn.e.stark, at (757) 628-4588 if you have any questions.

The completed PPQ is due on or before March 24, 2016 1:00 PM Eastern.

II. GENERAL INFORMATION

A.PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATOR & ORGANIZATION/COMPANY INFORMATION
1
Your Name:
2
Your Title:
3
Your Organization/

Company Name:

4
Address:
5
Your Phone Number:
6
Your Fax Number:
7
Your E-mail Address:
8
Date:
9
Your Signature:

B. CONTRACTOR NAME & CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1
Name of Contractor being evaluated:
2
Type of Instrument (e.g., Contract, Purchase Order, Task Order, Other):
3
Pricing Type (e.g., Fixed Price, Time & Material, Cost Reimbursement, Other):
4
Contract or Reference Number:
5
Subcontract Number (if applicable):
6
Order Number (if applicable):
7
Role of Contractor (Prime or Sub)

(if sub, also provide name of prime)

8
Description of Service/Supply:
9
Competitive (Y/N):
10
Follow-On (Y/N):
11
Date of Award:
12
Initial Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
13
Final Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
14
Period of Performance:
15
Place(s) of Performance:
16
Complexity of Work

(e.g., difficult, routine):

17
If applicable , type and extent of subcontracting:

III. GENERAL GUIDANCE

Please use the following ratings to score the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):

Past Performance Quality Ratings

Rating
Description
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
The offeror has no past performance history OR the Contracting Officer has determined that the past performance information provided is not directly related or similar to the requirements in the RFQ.

IV. EVALUATION: Rate the contractor in each of the following Evaluation Areas.

0
1
2
3
4
N/A
1.
Quality of Product or Service – please rate

Comments:

2.
Schedule - Timeliness of Performance – please rate

Comments:

0
1
2
3
4
N/A
3.
Cost Control – please rate

Comments:

4.
Business Relations – please rate

Comments:

5
Management of Key Personnel – please rate

Comments:

6
Utilization of Small Business

Comments:

Were Subcontractors Used? ____Yes _____No Comments for Subcontracts

V. SUMMARY

Would your organization/company award another contract to this Contractor (or use the services of the Contractor again)? |_| Yes / |_| No

In summary, if you care to, please give your overall assessment of this Contractor.

Do you have any additional comments to add?

“Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.”

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .