Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 73 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ALCO DEI/MDE Tech Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSCG80-16-R-P45216
About this file
Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_001.pdf | ||
| 16-P45216_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_SOW_-_ALCO_TECH_SUPPORT_FOR_WMEC_FLEET.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_3_-_Contract_Clauses.doc | DOC document | |
| 16-P45216_Solicitation.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Proposal: HSCG80-16-R-P45216
Attachment 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. COAST GUARD
SURFACE FORCES LOGISTICS CENTER (SFLC)
mEDIUM ENDURANCE CUTTER PRODUCT LINE (mecpl)
300 EAST MAIN STREET
nOROLK, VA 23510 Solicitation: HSCG80-16-R-P45216
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
In order to assess potential vendors, the MECPL contracting office is obtaining past performance information with respect to each offeror. This PPQ must be completed by the Past Performance Reference, NOT the Offeror, and submitted directly to the Contract Specialist by the Past Performance Reference. The completed PPQ shall not be released to the offeror. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. We are thanking you in advance for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire. Please submit the completed form to Jessica Loftus, Contract Specialist via email at Jessica.J.Loftus2@uscg.mil. Please contact Mrs. Loftus at (757) 628-4638 if you have any questions. The completed PPQ is due on or before April 13, 2016 @ 1200.
I. GENERAL GUIDANCE
Please use the following rating in scoring the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Exceeds |
| The Contractor's past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Contractor's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements |
| Marginal |
| The Contractor's past performance could have been improved. The Contractor required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The Contractor's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements. |
II. GENERAL INFORMATION
A.
AGENCY & RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:
| 1 |
| Name: |
| 2 |
| Title: |
| 3 |
| Organization: |
| 4 |
| Address: |
| 5 |
| Phone Number: |
| 6 |
| Fax Number: |
| 7 |
| E-mail Address: |
| 8 |
| Date: |
| 9 |
| Signature: |
B.
CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:
| 1 |
| Name of Contractor: |
| 1 |
| Type of Instrument |
(e.g. Contract/BPA/Order/Other):
| 2 |
| Contract Identification Number: |
| 3 |
| Order Number (If applicable): |
| 4 |
| Project Title and Service Description (Add rows if needed): |
| 5 |
| Type of Contract |
(e.g. Negotiated, Sealed Bid):
| 6 |
| Pricing Type (e.g. Fixed Price, T&M, |
Cost Reimbursement, other):
| 7 |
| Date of Award: |
| 8 |
| Contract Dollar Value/Ceiling: |
| 9 |
| Period of Performance: |
| 10 |
| Place(s) of Performance: |
C.
GENERAL INFORMATION
| 1 |
| Has this Contractor ever failed to provide services required by the contract? If yes, explain. |
III. EVALUATION: How Would You Rate This Contractor With Respect To:
A. Compliance with the SOW and specifications; conformance to standards of good workmanship, and responsiveness to technical direction:
| Rating |
| Exceeds |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check (
Summary:
B. Adherence to the contract delivery schedule:
| Rating |
| Exceeds |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check (
Summary:
Summary:
C. Working relationship with Contracting Officer, COR, and other points of contact:
| Rating |
| Exceeds |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check (
Summary:
In summary, if you care to, please give your overall assessment of this contractor.
Do you have additional comments to add?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .