Attachment_7-_SINS-2_Past_Performance_Questionaire.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Scalable Integrated Navigation System Two (SINS-2)
Solicitation number
HSCG44-16-R-001000
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 7 Past Performance Questionaire

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment A

Past Performance Questionnaire (Complete one form per reference)

Please fill out the following information in regards to the solicitation.

SECTION A – TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR

Offeror:

Contract Number:

BPA Number:

Order Number:

_____ Prime or _____ Subcontractor (Check one)

Dollar Amount:
Date Completed:
Contract Type:
_____ Fixed Price _____ Cost Reimbursement _____ Other (Specify)

(Check one)

Item/Service Description:

Contract Quantity/Period of Performance:

Customer/Business/Agency Name:

Customer POC (Note: Ensure POC information is valid and current) Name:

Address:

Phone:

E-mail:

SECTION B – TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE GOVERNMENT

The offeror in Section A provided you as reference for a solicitation they are a party to. Please complete the following.

Evaluation Indicate the contractor’s past performance for each category area and overall by identifying with an “x” of check mark for the most appropriate rating according to the scale shown below. Provide rationale, including specific examples, as appropriate, to support your ratings in the space provided for comments for each category area. If more space is needed, continue your comments in the “Additional Comments” section at the end of this questionnaire.

Use the rating definitions in Table 1 to perform contractor confidence assessments where appropriate.

TABLE 1 – CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATINGS

Rating
Description
Substantial Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Limited Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Use the rating definitions in Table 2 to perform contractor relevancy assessments where appropriate.

TABLE 1- RELEVANCY RATINGS

Rating
Description
Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Use the Table 3 to assess contractor past performance where appropriate.

TABLE 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS

Category
Rating

1. Confidence:

__Substantial Confidence __Satisfactory Confidence __Neutral Confidence __Limited Confidence __No Confidence

2. Relevancy:
__Relevant

__Not Relevant

Additional Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .