Attachment_7-_SINS-2_Past_Performance_Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Scalable Integrated Navigation System Two (SINS-2) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSCG44-16-R-001000
About this file
Attachment 7 Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_1-_SINS-2_Proposed_Pricing_Schedule_01Sep16.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_1-_SINS-2_Proposed_Pricing_Schedule_31Aug16.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| P0004__Questions_Clarification.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_1-_SINS-2_Proposed_Pricing_Schedule_P00003.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SINS-2_Questions_and_Answers_P00003.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_6-_SINS-2_PROPOSAL_CROSSWALK_P00003.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_2-_SINS-2_Specifications_P00003.docx | DOCX document | |
| EAIS_IDD_v5_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2-_SINS-2_Specifications_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_4-_DHS_Form_700-21.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6-_SINS-2_PROPOSAL_CROSSWALK.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_2-_SINS-2_Specifications_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_5-_DHS_Form_700-03.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3-_SINS-2_Packaging_Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1-_SINS-2_Proposed_Pricing_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment A
Past Performance Questionnaire (Complete one form per reference)
Please fill out the following information in regards to the solicitation.
SECTION A – TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
Offeror:
Contract Number:
BPA Number:
Order Number:
_____ Prime or _____ Subcontractor (Check one)
| Dollar Amount: |
| Date Completed: |
| Contract Type: |
| _____ Fixed Price _____ Cost Reimbursement _____ Other (Specify) |
(Check one)
Item/Service Description:
Contract Quantity/Period of Performance:
Customer/Business/Agency Name:
Customer POC (Note: Ensure POC information is valid and current) Name:
Address:
Phone:
E-mail:
SECTION B – TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE GOVERNMENT
The offeror in Section A provided you as reference for a solicitation they are a party to. Please complete the following.
Evaluation Indicate the contractor’s past performance for each category area and overall by identifying with an “x” of check mark for the most appropriate rating according to the scale shown below. Provide rationale, including specific examples, as appropriate, to support your ratings in the space provided for comments for each category area. If more space is needed, continue your comments in the “Additional Comments” section at the end of this questionnaire.
Use the rating definitions in Table 1 to perform contractor confidence assessments where appropriate.
TABLE 1 – CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATINGS
| Rating |
| Description |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral Confidence |
| No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. |
| Limited Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
Use the rating definitions in Table 2 to perform contractor relevancy assessments where appropriate.
TABLE 1- RELEVANCY RATINGS
| Rating |
| Description |
| Relevant |
| Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Not Relevant |
| Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
Use the Table 3 to assess contractor past performance where appropriate.
TABLE 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS
| Category |
| Rating |
1. Confidence:
__Substantial Confidence __Satisfactory Confidence __Neutral Confidence __Limited Confidence __No Confidence
| 2. Relevancy: |
| __Relevant |
__Not Relevant
Additional Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .