PastPerfQuest.doc

DOC document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Monobloc Propellers (Standard and Small Boats)
Solicitation number
HSCG40-08-R-60042
Issued by

About this file

Attachment J.3 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SolicitationII.doc DOC document
Amendment 5.doc DOC document
Amendment 3.doc DOC document
75C-WAGL_4400_2_1_-_- 1 .tif TIF image
Amend3-Q A.doc DOC document
SPEC-Change2.doc DOC document
Amendment 2.doc DOC document
SPEC-Change1.doc DOC document
Amendment 1.doc DOC document
SolicitationI.doc DOC document
Bar Code Spec Rev G.doc DOC document
SF 33.doc DOC document
DRAWINGS-PROPS.zip ZIP file
SpecProps.doc DOC document
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HSCG40-08-R-60042

Attachment J.3

Past Performance Questionnaire

Purpose: The U.S. Coast Guard has a requirement for various small and standard boat propellers to be manufactured in accordance with the Coast Guard Specification Number P-245-0146, and that are associated with the Coast Guard drawings that form a part of the solicitation requirements. This questionnaire is to be used by the Contract Specialist to obtain past performance information from a reference listed in an Offeror’s proposal.

Your company name

Product Description

Point of Contact

Contract No.

Delivery Order No.

Contracting Officer/Buyer

Contractor Name

Your E-Mail Address Phone/fax number

Date:

Questions

1. To what extent did the contractor adhere to the contract/delivery order schedule?

Considerably surpassed/exceeded delivery schedules [ ] Met delivery schedule (no excusable delays) [ ] Minimal delay (did not impact achievement of contract requirements) [ ] Extensive unexcused delays [ ]

Comments:

Past Performance Questionnaire

2. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from your company?

Completely successful [ ] Generally successful [ ] Little success [ ] No success [ ]

3. To what extend did the contractor display initiative in meeting requirements?

Displayed considerable initiative [ ] Displayed some initiative [ ] Displayed little initiative [ ] Displayed no initiative [ ]

4. Has the contract been partially or completely terminated for default?

[ ] YES

[ ] NO

If yes, briefly explain (i.e. inability to meet performance or delivery schedules)

5. Provide an overall rating of the contractor’s quality of the product supplied.

Excellent – conformed to contract/specification requirements [ ] Satisfactory – slight nonformance did not effect product [ ] Unsatisfactory – nonconformance inhibited product usefulness [ ] Poor – extensive nonconformance [ ]

If the contractor experienced extensive nonconformance, please explain below the circumstances surrounding nonconformance (i.e. inability to meet specification requirements).

Past Performance Questionnaire

6. Would you contract with the contractor again and would you refer this contractor to other potential sources?

YES [ ]

NO [ ]

7. Did the contractor manufacture the product?

YES [ ]

NO [ ]

If NO, please explain:

Thank you for your participation in this past performance questionnaire.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .