Attachment_B_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-_HSCEDM14R00002.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Detention Services, Southern Florida Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HSCEDM-14-R-00002
Issued by
Immigration and Customs Enforcement

About this file

Attachment B

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Detention Services, Southern Florida, newest first.
File Type Posted
Section_B-M_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_QASP_Amend0001.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_-_Government_Owned_Vehicles.pdf PDF
Attachment_E_-_Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet_Amend0001.xls XLS spreadsheet
SF-30_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-_Personal_Property_Operations_Handbook.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_Authorized_Restraint_Devices_Guidelines.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Past_Performance_Release_Letter_-_HSCEDM14R00002.docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_-_Interim_ICE_Firearms_Policy.pdf PDF
Attachment_E_-_Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_8_-_Vehicle_Management_Handbook.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_Interim_ICE_Use_of_Force_Policy.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_ICE_Body_Armor_Policy.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_-_ICE_Suitability_Screening_Requirements_for_contractor_personnel.pdf PDF
Attachment_D_-_ICE_Subcontracting_Plan_Outline.doc DOC document
Attachment_C_-_Past_Performance_Summary_Sheet_-_HSCEDM14R00002.docx DOCX document
HSCEDM-14-R-00002_Section_C.pdf PDF
Attachment_F_-_Solicitation_Questions.docx DOCX document
Attachment_10_-_Prison_Rape_Elimination_Act.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_-_QASP_04_03_14.pdf PDF
HSCEDM-14-R-00002_Section_A-B_and_D-M.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_WD_2005-2112_Revision_14.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT B

Past Performance Questionnaire

HSCEDM-14-R-00002 (South Florida Detention Management Services)

Please complete the questionnaire and email to robbi.gregg@ice.dhs.gov:

Section A: Past Performance Questionnaire (completed by offeror)

Offeror Name
DUNS No.:

Address:

Program Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type(s):

Date of Award:

Status:

Contracting Agency/Customer:

Period of Performance

Contract Value:

Exclude unexercised options

Ceiling:
Original:
Current:

Reason for Change(s) in Value:

Completion Date:

Original:
Current:
Estimate at Completion ($):

Type and extent of subcontracting:

Description of effort:

Section B: Points of Contact (completed by Respondent)

Name:

Title

Company/Agency

Address:

Phone:

Email:

Signature:

For each question, please place an “X” in the box corresponding to the rating. Please provide supporting rationale for all ratings except “Satisfactory” or “Not Applicable.” The narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed, clear and concise. Space for narrative comments is provided after each question, and the blocks will expand to accommodate the text as it is entered. An example of a “Very Good” rating is as follows:

RATING
DEFINITION
Excellent
The Offeror's past performance exceeded the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits.
Satisfactory
The Offeror's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements
Marginal
The Offeror's past performance could have been improved. The Offeror required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Unsatisfactory
The Offeror's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements.

Corporate Commitment

1. To what extent did the offeror solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from the customer?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. To what extent did the offeror supply adequate, timely, and qualified replacement personnel for all positions?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3. To what extent did the offeror use key personnel proposed in their offer as key personnel in the contract?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quality of Services

4. To what extent did the offeror provide high quality services that ensured maximum accuracy throughout, cost effectiveness, and overall client satisfaction?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5. To what extent was the offeror able to provide quality reports and documentation?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Timeliness

6. To what extent was the offeror’s ability to replace personnel identified and assigned to the project in a timely manner?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

7. How was the offeror’s responsiveness to emergency situations?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

8. How was the offeror’s ability to submit required proposals and invoices for temporary services in a timely manner?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Effective Use of Resources

9. To what extent did the offeror effectively plan work to ensure maximum utilization of resources?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Termination History

10. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
[ ]Yes [ ]Default ] Convenience

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

11. Are there any pending terminations?
[ ] Yes [ ] No

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Experience history

12. How effective has the offeror been in identifying user requirements?
[ ]E [ ]S [ ]M [ ]U [ ]N/A

Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .