Industry Day Briefing_draft 03 30 09_v5.ppt

Welcome to Industry Day

U.S. Customs and Border Protection Secure Border Initiative

Last Updated: 2/25/2009

Secure Border Initiative (SBI)

SBI’s Requirement For

Program Management Office Support Solution (PMOSS)

March 30, 2009

Agenda Agenda & Purpose

Facilities

Introductions

Ground Rules

RFP

HCA Comments

Information Briefing

Questions & Answers

Summary 9:30

9:35

9:40

9:45

9:50

10:10

10:15

11:00

12:00 Jonathan Todd

Jonathan Todd

Jonathan Todd

Jonathan Todd

Jonathan Todd

Tiffany Hixson

Mark Borkowski

Jonathan Todd

Jonathan Todd

the lobby or the atrium just outside the building

Purpose To highlight important aspects of the draft RFP

Provide Offerors with a better understanding of the Performance Work Statement (PWS)

To encourage potential Offerors to provide written feedback

Facilities Restrooms are on the right as you walk through the glass doors and toward the rotunda

Food Court on the lower level behind the steps

Introductions Mark Borkowski, SBI Executive Director

Tiffany Hixson, Executive Director, SBI Acquisition Office

James Riordan, SBInet Executive Program Manager

Rob Brown, Director, Business Management Operations

Kurtis Guth, Director, Systems Engineering

Kelly Good, Director, Operational Integration

Maggie Arnberg, Director of Deployment

John Wells, Project Manager, Tactical Infrastructure Program Office

Jeff Gwilliam, Chief of the Contracting Office

Jonathan Todd, Contracting Officer

Ground Rules The draft RFP is on the Federal Business Opportunities website at www.fbo.gov

No audio or video recording of the Industry Day Conference is permitted

Please silence or turn off any cellular phones or other electronic devices

Written comments can be dropped in the box provided or submitted via e-mail to SBI-PMOSupport@DHS.gov

Questions, answers and today’s briefing slides will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website no later than four days after this conference

Written responses will supersede oral responses

Draft RFP

Firm Fixed Price (FFP)

Section C- Performance Work Statement Notional Current and End State

A Solution

Change in scope as program staff matures

Quarterly adjustments

Section H- Special Contract Requirements (Clause H.26)—Organization Conflicts of Interest

(Clause H.27)—Limitation of Future Contracting

Section I- Contract Clauses I.20 3052.219-71 DHS Mentor- Protégé Program

I.21 3052.219-72 Evaluation of Prime Contractor

Participation in the DHS Mentor- Protégé Program

Section L- Instructions, Conditions… The proposal shall consist of three physically separated volumes:

Section M- Evaluation Factors Evaluation Factors

Factor 1: Management and Staffing Approach (See L.7.1) Factor 2: Technical Approach (See L.7.2) Factor 3: Past Performance (See L.7.3) Factor 4: Small Business Utilization and SB Subcontracting Plan (See L.7.4); and Factor 5: Cost (See L.8)

All technical (non-cost) evaluation factors, when combined, are more important than cost. Technical Evaluation Factor 1 is more important than Factors 2, 3 and 4. Factors 2, 3 and 4 are of equal importance. The elements under each factor are equally important.

Milestone Dates RFP Release 3 April

Proposals Due 4 May

Award 14 July

Informational Briefing

SBI Enhances Border Security The Secure Border Initiative (SBI) provides tactical infrastructure and technology as complements to personnel

Tactical infrastructure focus is 670 miles of fence to provide persistent impedance against illegal border activity between the ports of entry

Technology includes advanced sensors integrated with command, control, communications, and intelligence (C3I) to provide continuous surveillance and situational awareness of border security

SBI Functions Operational Integration Facilitate identification and communication of operational requirements, needs, desires

Technology Demonstration Research and assess new capabilities

Commodity Procurement Purchase commercially available stuff

System Development (and Deployment) Develop new capabilities based on requirements or perceived opportunities

Tactical Infrastructure Includes fencing, roads, lights…

Current focus is 670 miles of fence along the Southwest Border Provides persistence impedance

Future investments under review Based on prioritized requirements and available funding

SBInet Acquisition of technology (sensors, command & control systems) to enhance border security

“Project 28” provided proof of concept and initial operational capability in the Tucson Sector

Production tower design for Arizona is complete

Development of the common operating picture (COP, our command and control system) is continuing

Deployment of operational systems for Tucson-1 (TUS-1) and AJO-1 begin in CY 2009

Modest deployments begin on the Northern Border in CY2009

Production Surveillance Tower

Tower Sensors

Tucson-1 Layout

COMM Tower - Existing COMM Tower – New build Sensor Tower – New build Sensor Tower – P28 OBP Facility - Existing Legend #85 (Rose), RDT-80 ft, Buenos Aires #287 (Da La Osa Ranch), RDT-40 ft, Buenos Aires #291 (Sasabe POE), RDT-40 ft, GSA #41 (County Line), RDT-80 ft, State of Arizona #290 (Spears Ranch), RDT-40 ft, Private

#108 (TUS HQ)

#192 (Mt Lemmon) #103 (Keystone Peak) #300 (Pima Cty) #32 (M4), RDT-80 ft, Pima Cty #299 (Garcia Ranch), RDT-80 ft, Buenos Aires #298 (Blackberry Hill), RDT-80 ft, Coronado #181 (Freshal Relay), RDT-80 ft, Coronado #36 (Black Mesa), RDT-100 ft, Coronado #185 (Tres Belotas), RDT-120 ft, Coronado #35 (Guijas), RDT-80 ft, Buenos Aires Comm Link – New #187 (West Arivaca Relay), RDT-120 ft, Buenos Aires

Northern Border Project Initial Steps

St. Claire River

Niagara River 5 RVSS Towers St. Lawrence River

1 MSS

Northern Lake Champlain

Remote Video Surveillance System (RVSS) 80-foot Monopole Tower

Detroit Sector (qty 9) Buffalo Sector (qty 3)

Status: procured and in storage; awaiting deployment

Remote Video Surveillance System (RVSS) Camera Bundle

Night Conqueror IR camera (left) Hitachi Day Color camera on (right) Two bundles on each tower

Buffalo Sector—Possible RVSS Deployment

N

Mobile Surveillance System (MSS)

Detroit Sector (qty 1) Swanton Sector (qty 2) Status: Awarded 9/29/08 to Telephonics Delivery Schedule: May 2009 Day and night cameras Ground surveillance radar Laser illuminator Data displays Command and control links

Current Organizational Issues

Organizational Planning Clear definition of roles and relationships

Creation of structure for the future

Evolve gradually over the next year

Executive Director (SES) Deputy Executive Director (SES) Administration Operational Integration SBInet Program Tactical Infrastructure Program Business Management Operations System Engineering

6 FTE

5 FTE 4 Cont 50 FTE 15 Cont 10 FTE 6 Cont 15 FTE 5 Cont 55 FTE 15 Cont 40 FTE 10 Cont Notional Totals: 181 FTE, 50 Contractor. Does not include Contracting

Contracting

System Engineering Function

System Engineering

Business Management Operations Function

Bus Mgt Ops

Operational Integration Function

Operational Integration

Contractor Roles Substitute for lack of government personnel during transition to full government staffing

As an end state, PMOSS should augment core government capabilities to perform effective acquisition program management

Tactical Infrastructure Program In October 2007, CBP established the Tactical Infrastructure (TI) Program to develop and install the fences (pedestrian and vehicle), roads, and lighting solutions along the Southwest Border.

The TI Program is responsible for all TI construction; leading, managing, and working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), for example, to implement DHS’s TI goals.

Tactical Infrastructure What is it?

“Tactical Infrastructure” (TI) is a term used by CBP to describe physical components that help secure our borders, such as lighting, roads, pedestrian and vehicle fencing.

Why do we use it?

Installation of TI has proven to be an effective tool to slow, redirect, and deter illegal entries in areas where personnel and technology, alone, cannot sufficiently secure our borders.

Where does it go?

CBP determines fence locations through operational assessments made by local Border Patrol agents and Chiefs, based on illegal cross-border activity and the Border Patrol’s extensive field experience in these areas.

Other considerations?

Three main factors contribute to fence location decisions in addition to the initial Border Patrol operational assessments: (1) engineering assessments, which include construction costs; (2) environmental analysis; (3) and input from stakeholders.

TI Construction Environments Urban In an urban environment, an illegal entrant can cross the border in a matter of minutes. Here, pedestrian fence provides a critical barrier and buys agents additional time.

Rural In a rural environment agents have more time to bring an illegal incursion to the proper resolution. This makes it more likely that vehicles will be used for getting from the point of entry to staging areas and community infrastructure that supports and conceals them. In this environment, vehicle fence can be utilized to prevent vehicles from entering, and to limit the speed and carrying capability of illegal entrants, augmenting with sensor and surveillance technology to detect and track illegal entrants on foot.

Remote Remote environments may be completely uninhabited with no roads at or near the border. It could take hours or even days to cross the border and reach a road or community infrastructure. Vehicle fence is effective in remote areas where vehicles can travel cross country.

Ongoing Projects Pedestrian Fence 225 (PF225)

Vehicle Fence 300 (VF300)

Supply and Supply Chain Management The SSCM will ensure all fence construction materials are available – in sufficient quantities and quality, and at the appropriate locations – to meet construction schedules, and minimize all required resources and costs

TI Projects

Environmental & Land-Management Waivers DHS has issued environmental and land-management waivers to expedite installing additional physical barriers and roads at the border.

A substantial portion of the project areas addressed by these waivers has already undergone environmental reviews. In those areas where environmental reviews have not yet occurred, the department will conduct a review before any major construction begins.

Although the Secretary’s decision means certain environmental laws will be waived, DHS has not and will not compromise its demonstrated, ongoing commitment to responsible environmental stewardship.

Community Involvement DHS is committed to meeting national security requirements while respecting the needs of the border communities.

Since May 2007, DHS continues to hold extensive discussions with state and local stakeholders, including landowners, about the placement of the remaining miles of fences.

As part of these outreach efforts, more than 600 individual landowners have been contacted and over 100 meetings with local officials, public open houses and town halls have been held along the Southwest Border.

Questions & Answers

Summary

THANK YOU

For more information on SBI, please visit us on the Web: WWW.CBP.GOV/SBI Additional questions regarding PMOSS should be sent to SBI-PMOSupport@DHS.gov before the closing date

Program Management Office Support Solution (PMOSS)