Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 48 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AW 139 Pilot Training
- Solicitation number
- HSBP1009R2119
About this file
Past Performance Quetionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 Additional Instructions for Preparation of Proposals.doc | DOC document | |
| HSBP1009R2119 - Revision 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 SOW AW139.doc | DOC document | |
| HSBP1009R2119 - 2-13-09.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Additional Instructions for Preparation of Proposals.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 3 Evaluation Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 4 CBP SB Subcontracting Plan Outline.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete the following questionnaire and return by electronic mail to:
Joquita.pitt@dhs.gov This survey pertains to:
Department/Component:
Contract Number: ______________________Date of Survey: _______________
Name of Person Completing Survey:
Signature of Person Completing Survey:
Your Company/Agency:
Your role in this Contract (check one) :
( Contracting Officer
( Other
Contract Value (including options): $___________________________________
Performance Period: _______________________________________________
(Including Options)
Type of Contract: _________________________________________________
Approximate percentage of work being performed (or completed) by subcontractor(s): _______________%
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY
Information on subcontractor(s) (where the subcontractor completed more than
50% of work):
Subcontractor
Program Manager
Phone
General description of products/services required under the contract:
RATINGS
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support rating shall be noted on Page 4.
Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle “N/A” (not applicable/no opinion).
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Compliance with contract requirements:
N/A
2. Accuracy of reports:
N/A
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY
3. Effectiveness of personnel:
4. Technical Excellence:
N/A
COST CONTROL (Not applicable to Fixed Price Type Contracts)
1. Record of forecasting and controlling target costs:
2. Current, accurate and complete billings:
3. Relationship of negotiated costs to actual:
4. Cost efficiencies:
N/A
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
1. Met interim milestones:
2. Reliability:
3. Responsive to technical direction:
4. Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration:
5. Met delivery schedules:
N/A
6. Liquidate damages assessed: ( Yes ( No
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Effective management, including management of subcontracts:
2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:
3. Responsive to contract requirements:
4. Notification of problems:
5. Flexibility:
6. Pro-active vs. reactive:
N/A
SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS GOALS
1. The contractor met the goals set forth in its Subcontracting Plan. (See FAR 19.7 and 15.305(a)2(v):
( Yes
( No
( N/A
Comments (optional):
2. The contractor met Small Disadvantaged Business Participation goals. (See FAR 15.305(a)2(v) and FAR 19.1202):
( N/A
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:
2. Would you recommend selection of this firm again?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY
RATING GUIDELINES
| QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE |
| COST CONTROL |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| BUSINESS RELATIONS |
| 0-Unsatisfactory |
| Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives |
| Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively |
| Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective |
| 1-Poor |
| Major problems have been encountered |
| Contractor is having major difficulty managing costs effectively |
| Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective |
| 2-Fair |
| Some problems have been encountered |
| Contractor is having some problems managing costs effectively |
| Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective |
| 3-Good |
| Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified |
| Contractor is usually effective in managing costs |
| Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective |
| 4-Excellent |
| Contractor is in compliance with Contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services |
| Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete |
Billings
| Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective |
5-Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above four categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent."
HSBP1009R2119
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .