PPQ.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Consultation, Facilitation, Leadership Alignment and Strategic Collaboration
Solicitation number
HS0021-17-R-0005
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire in a microsoft word format for ease of use.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
HS0021-17-R-0005_Conformed.pdf PDF
ConFLASC_Q&A.pdf PDF
Pricing_Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HS0021-17-R-0005-0001.pdf PDF
Labor_Category_Table.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Past Performance Questionnaire Form

PART I:

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

The Offeror shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail the questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and technical representative responsible for the past/current contract. The Points Of Contacts shall electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Office no later than proposal due date, to James Modlin at james.a.modlin.civ@mail.mil or Kathy Storaker, kathy.l.storaker.civ@mail.mil with “ConFLASC PPQ for (insert prime Offeror’s name)” in the subject line of the e-mail.

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does.

This information, when filled in, shall be treated as Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104-3 and shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government Source Selection Team.

2. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SOLICITATION:

This solicitation is for the Defense Security Service (DSS) for Consultation, Facilitation, Leadership Alignment and Strategic Collaboration (ConFLASC), and the support services requirement is a critical program necessary to support the DSS with each mission area. The successful Offeror(s) will be awarded an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. The successful Offeror(s) may also be awarded a Task Order(s) through the same evaluation as the IDIQ. Additionally, the successful Offeror(s) will be provided the opportunity to propose on additional requirements (Task Order(s)) as they are identified from the DSS.

3. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

a. Name:

b. Title:

c. Date:

d. Telephone Number:

e. Address:

f. E-mail Address:

4. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor (Contractor/Company Name/Division and CAGE Code):

b. Address

c. Contract Number:

d. Contract Type (Firm Fixed Price; Cost Reimbursement; T&M):

e. Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

f. Contract Award Date:

g. Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

h. Work Performed (Provide additional information):

i. Was this contract competitively awarded? Yes _____No_____
j. Was this a follow-on contract? Yes _____No _____

k. Period of Performance:

l. Place of Performance:

m. Security (please mark the security requirements which were included in your contract’s DD Form 254):

Top Secret Facility Clearance

Top Secret Safeguarding

Secret Facility Clearance

n. Your Title (e.g. PCO, ACO, COR, etc.) and period of involvement with the contract:

Title Period of Involvement

4. ADJECTIVAL RATINGS

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART II: (To be completed by the Point of Contact – Respondent)

5. QUESTIONS:

Technical Performance

1. To what extent did the service provider satisfy technical performance requirements, on an overall basis? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

Comments:

2. To what extent did the service provider control schedule and cost to meet all project objectives? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

3. To what extent did the service provide good operational support, reliability and responsiveness to technical direction, initiative and adequacy of resources? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

4. To what extent did the service provider perform consultation support services? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

5. To what extent did the service provider perform facilitation support services? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

6. To what extent did the service provider perform leadership alignment support services? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

7. To what extent did the service provider perform strategic collaboration support services? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

8. To what extent did the service provider satisfy the types of work identified in the ConFLASC requirement: Consultation, Facilitation, Leadership Alignment and/or Strategic Collaboration? Please indicate the level of performance for each type of work.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

9. To what extent did the service provide offer effective project management (to include use and control of subcontractors)? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

10. To what extent was the service provider committed customer satisfaction and concern for its customers’ interest? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

Schedule Performance

1. To what extent did the Service provider meet required performance schedules, on an overall basis? Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

Cost Performance

1. To what extent did the contractor stay within cost estimates?

Please check one answer.

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable

Too soon to tell

Not applicable

6. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:

Please provide the following information:

a. Organization:

b. Name:

c. Title:

d. Date:

e. Telephone Number:

f. Address:

g. E-mail Address:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .