Exhibits A B - PP Martix Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EXERCISE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HQ0236-12-T-0003
- Issued by
- Defense Security Cooperation Agency
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 12-T-0003- AMD 04 | — | |
| 12-T-0003-AMD 03 | — | |
| PWS CISS Program Manager Revised 24 JAN 2011.pdf | ||
| 12-T-0003-AMD 02.pdf | ||
| 12-T-0003-AMD 01.pdf | ||
| 12-T-0003.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE MATRIX
Exhibit A
a. Contract Number:
b. Contract title and general scope of the contract:
c. Contract agency or organization:
d. Reference Name:
e. Reference Title:
f. Reference Address, Telephone number and E-mail address:
g. Reference Name:
h. Reference Title:
i. Reference Address, Telephone number and E-mail address:
j. Contract award date:
k. Contract period of performance
l. Actual value at time of award (total and per year)
m. Final or current contract value including all modifications and exercised options with an explanation of cost growth (if any)
n. Type of contract (e.g. Cost Plus Award Fee, Firm Fixed Price, etc.)
o. Prime contractor’s name and functions performed under this contract
p. Significant accomplishments and award received
q. Identify the portion of the total contract dollar value (per year) and nature of services self-performed by your firm.
r. The referenced contract involved the following:
___ Developing Exercises ___ Conducting Exercises ___ European and Eurasian global security issues
s. Describe in detail the quoted Exercise Program Manager’s experience under the referenced contract designing exercises, simulations and games to include description of teaching aids developed for a military or civilian higher educational institution. For each indicate if it was published, not published but shared by peers or for personal use only. If publications are identified, the quoters must include the title, publisher’s name and date. Experience designing exercises, simulations and games for elements of the U.S. Department of Defense will be an advantage, as this is expected to be frequently necessary.
t. Describe in detail the Exercise Program Manager’s experience under the referenced contract conducting exercises, simulations and games to include number of years conducting exercises, simulations and games, and the target audience. Experience conducting exercises, simulations and games for elements of the U.S. Department of Defense will be an advantage, as this is expected to be frequently necessary.
u. Describe in detail the Exercise Program Manager’s experience under the referenced contract with European and Eurasian global security challenges to include exercise preparation and related work undertaken in security studies institutions.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Exhibit B
(Name of Quoted Exercise Program Manager) is being considered in a Source Selection by the College of International and Security Studies (CISS) at the George C. Marshall Center in Garmisch, Germany. It would be appreciated if you would provide us with comments regarding the named exercise program manager's past performance. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the Federal Acquisition Regulation (15.1004) prohibits the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about a contractor’s past performance. In order to maintain the integrity of the source selection process, we respectfully request that you do not divulge the name of the contractor nor discuss your comments on this questionnaire with any other individuals. Please fax or e-mail this form as soon as possible to: Jim Miller at +49 (0) 8821 750 2603 or James.F.Miller1@marshallcenter.org.
Background:
The George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies (GCMC) is an international educational institution funded by the United States Department of Defense and the German Ministry of Defense. Its mission is to create a more stable security environment by advancing democratic defense institutions and relationships; promoting active, peaceful security cooperation; and enhancing enduring partnerships among the nations of North America, Europe and Eurasia and beyond. GCMC routinely hosts participants from around the world. Generally, they are members of the military, government or subject matter experts. They have the ability to affect change and are critical to the overall success of GCMC’s mission.
The GCMC College of International and Security Studies (CISS) specifically supports the GCMC mission by offering resident courses and non-resident activities designed to enhance and improve communication, collaboration planning, critical thinking, strategic leadership and international cooperation. The CISS resident course program’s and non-resident activity’s curriculum incorporates exercises, games, and simulations as a component of the interactive, participatory educational instruction program. The exercises, games, and simulations are used to engage program participants in selected topics relevant to current priority national and international security related issues; decision making processes at the international, strategic, interagency, and high operational levels; and the use of military forces and other types of governmental assistance in joint and combined operations to achieve defined security objectives across the full spectrum of operations.
The CISS utilizes a range of educational exercises, games and simulations with the objective(s) of addressing political, military, economic, social, cultural and environmental scenarios, which could lead to conflict between nations, states, alliances, or their citizens. Exercises, games and simulations may also address senior level decision-making, with issues related to budgeting, resourcing, domestic, and international economics, environmental issues, interagency decision-making process, national security strategy, national military strategy, stability operations, homeland security, and similar topics.
Exercises, games and simulations are a key part of the continuing adult learning experience. Successful design and execution of exercises, games and simulations tailored to the needs of each program, as well as the integration of lessons learned from student reviews of these exercises, games and simulations are critical to the success of the GCMC mission. Historically, when exercises, games and simulations failed to engage program participants, the GCMC goal to impart knowledge setting the conditions to achieve peace, stability and economic growth is diminished.
Your Project Information:
1. Contractor’s name (prime/sub):
2. Project title/contract number: ____________________________________________________
3. Date of award: ___________ 4. Actual completion date: ________
5. Contract currently in process: Yes No
6. Contract value per year:
7. Contract type: (FFP/CPAF/Etc.)
8. What types of exercises, simulations and games were designed by this exercise program manager under your contract? ___________________________________________________
9. What types of exercises, simulations and games were conducted by this exercise program manager under your contract? ____________________________________________________
10. What was the target audience for the exercises, simulations, and games designed? _______
11. What was the target audience for the exercises, simulations, and games conducted? _______ Reference Information:
Name: ________________________________________________ Date: ________________
Phone no.:________________________________ Fax no.:__________________________
Address:___________________________________________________________________
Your position or function in relation to project:______________________________________
Have you personally observed this exercise program manger? YES NO
Please evaluate the exercise program manager's performance using the following ratings.
| “VG” Very Good | The Exercise Program Manager’s performance clearly exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “G” Good | The Exercise Program Manager’s performance somewhat exceeded the contract requirements. |
| "S" Satisfactory | The Exercise Program Manager’s performance met the contract requirements. |
| "M" Marginal | The Exercise Program Manager’s performance met the minimum contract requirements but with difficulty. |
| "U" Unsatisfactory | The Exercise Program Manager’s performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements. |
Please provide any supporting information for the following: (Use additional sheets as needed)
1. Please describe the exercise program manager’s interpersonal skills.
Rating
2. Please describe the exercise program manager’s effectiveness and variety of conducting exercises, simulations and games employed.
Rating
3. Does the exercise program manager attempt to involve students in the process?
Rating
4. Does the exercise program manager provide meaningful learning activities to students?
Rating
5. Please describe the quality of exercises, simulations and games developed and used by the exercise program manager.
Rating
6. Please describe the exercise program manager’s ability to explain relevant concepts in English.
Rating
7. Please describe the feedback obtained from students for this exercise program manager.
Rating
8. Were your desired results achieved by this exercise program manager?
Rating
9. Please describe the exercise program manager’s teamwork with colleagues.
Rating
10. Is the exercise program manager consistently well prepared?
Rating
11. Please describe the relationship between the contractor and your contract team (if applicable).
Rating
12. Please describe the contractor's on-site management and coordination of subcontractors (if applicable).
Rating
13. Please describe the contractor's overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct.
Rating
14. Please describe the contractor's ability to provide the required work at a reasonable total price.
Rating
15. Has the contractor been given any of the following: Cure notice, show cause, letters of reprimand, suspension of payments, termination? If yes, please explain.
Rating
16. Was the customer satisfied with the end product?
Rating
17. Has the contractor been provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
Rating
18. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, please state reasons for not recommending this contractor for additional work.
Rating
19. Please provide any additional comments you think we should consider when making our selection:
Signature of Reference:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .