RFP 22R0050 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HQ003422R0050 Safety Glasses
- Solicitation number
- HQ003422R0050
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HQ003422R0050 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| HQ003422R0050-0001 Conform.pdf | ||
| HQ003422R0050 RFP Safety Glasses.pdf | ||
| RFP 22R0050 Safety Glasses NDA.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP 22R0050 Pricing Safety Glasses Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions:
The company that has provided this form to you is proposing to submit an offer to a Washington Headquarters Services/Acquisition Directorate (WHS/AD) solicitation to provide Safety Glasses.
Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition; therefore, your input is extremely important. Please fill in the questionnaire and emailed to the following contracting personnel: Lynette Thibodeaux and Stephenie Charlot before April 8, 2022:
LYNETTE.M.THIBODEAUX.CIV@MAIL.MIL
STEPHENIE.W.CHARLOT.CIV@MAIL.MIL
This information will not be disclosed to the offeror. However, a portion may be used for clarifications.
If you have any questions, please contact Lynette Thibodeaux at 202-913-5752.
| Contractor Name: |
| CAGE: |
| Contract Number: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Contract Value: |
| Complexity: |
Contract Role (Prime, Subktr, Team Mmbr):
Program Name:
Description of the Work Performed Under the Contract (Please be specific about tasks performed.)
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES
1155 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1155
SAFETY GLASSES HQ003422R0050
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Page | 4
Performance Survey:
| No. |
| Performance Questions |
| Response Definitions |
E=Excellent G=Good S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unacceptable N/A= Not Applicable
| Ratings (Type an “X” in the appropriate section for each response) |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules? |
| 2. |
| To what extent were the contractor's reports and documentation accurate and complete? |
| 3. |
| To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from the government counterparts? |
| 4.a. |
| To what extent did the contractor display initiative in meeting requirements? |
| 4.b. |
| Contractor’s ownership of problems and actively working to resolve them? |
| 5. |
| Did contractor commit adequate resources, in a timely fashion, to the contract to meet the requirements and to solve problems successfully? |
| 6. |
| NA |
| 7. |
| Communicating schedules, delays, and expectations and interfacing with Government employees? |
| 8. |
| Overall Responsiveness to Government requests? |
| 9. |
| Overall Contract Performance Rating? |
Additional Rater Comments about Contract Performance
Please list any other areas of concern or issues with the contractor.
Definitions:
Excellent: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Customer's benefit. The element assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer's benefit. The element assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The element assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified or taken satisfactory corrective action.
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery did not occur or is not likely to occur in a timely manner. The element assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective action appear or were ineffective.
Not applicable: Does not apply to the acquisition.
Rater Information
| Name |
| Title |
| Agency/Company |
| Phone: |
| Email: |
Signature (Digital or Ink)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .