J-L1_Attachment-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 300 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WHS Commissioning Services
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-15-R-0136
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
Attachment J-L1 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT J-L1: Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
HQ0034-15-R-0136
Dated: 22 February 2016
Pages: 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
TO: FACSIMILE:
PHONE: EMAIL:_________________________
Information Request
***NOTE: Offerors SHALL NOT complete this form on behalf of the reference. All completed questionnaires shall be returned directly to the Government and not to the offeror. If a completed questionnaire is submitted by the Offeror directly to the Government, the Questionnaire will NOT be evaluated. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Washington Headquarters Services is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract for the purchase of
Arc Flash Uniforms. [CONTRACTOR NAME] provided your name and organization as a reference regarding
[CONTRACT DESCRIPTION past performance under
(CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information in the following areas:
a.) Quality of Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information not later than 29 April 2016 at or before 11am Eastern Time (ET) to
Samia.c.bingham.civ@mail.mil
Washington Headquarters Services, Acquisition Directorate Attn: Samia Bingham
1225 South Clark Street
Suite 1202
Arlington, VA 22202
****TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE ONLY****
Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings:
Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), or Unsatisfactory (U). See next page for definition of ratings.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: _____________________________________________________________
B. Cage Code: _______________________________________
C. Contract number: ___________________________________________________________________________
D. Contract type (e.g. Fixed price, Cost reimbursement): ______________________________________________
E. Was the referenced contractor the prime contractor on this contract? Yes____ No____
Dated: 22 February 2016
Pages: 4
F. Type of Supply or Service: _____________________________
G. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
H. Period of performance: _______________________________________________________________________
I. Place of performance: _______________________________________________________________________
J. Initial Contract price: $_______________________________________________________________________
K. Current/final contract price: $__________________________________________________________________
L. Current status of contract (choose one)
[ ] Ongoing [ ] Complete [ ] Terminated for Convenience [ ] Terminated for Default [ ] Other (explain)
M. Reason(s) for differences between initial contract price and final contract price: __________________________
N. Description of commisioning services provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
SECTION 3: REVIEWER IDENTIFICATION
A. Reviewer's name:
B. Reviewer's title:
C. Reviewer's phone/email address:
Number of months the reviewer worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Neutral (N) or Unsatisfactory (U). See next page for definition of ratings.
Dated: 22 February 2016
Pages: 4
1. Please provide an overall rating of the contractor’s past performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
2. Please describe the quality of the work:
a. Conformance to contract requirements, accuracy of supply order and quality of uniforms..
b. Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction
3. Provide a detailed description of the Commissioning Services Project.
4. Did the contractor complete the project within schedule? Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling? If the answer is no, please explain the circumstances for delay.
5. If there were change orders (work that is added to or deleted from the original scope of work of a contract), please describe the contractor’s ability to successfully perform the contract requirements with the change in scope.
6. Please describe the Timeliness or Scheduling of Services/Deliveries, Emergencies, and/or Unforeseen
Requests?
Dated: 22 February 2016
Pages: 4
7. Please rate the level of effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business. Describe any problems.
8. Would you hire this contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Please provide comments using additional pages, if desired.
Reviewer’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Via Email to:
Samia Bingham
Contract Specialist
Washington Headquarters Services
Acquisition Directorate (WHS/AD)
EFCD/O&M-Pentagon
1225 South Clark St.
Arlington, VA 22202
Phone:703-545-1578 samia.c.bingham.civ@mail.mil mailto:samia.c.bingham.civ@mail.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .