J-4 Past Performance Questionaire.doc
DOC document 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Preventive Maintenance Mechanical Systems
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-11-R-0063
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
J-4 Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HQ0034-11-R-0063 0004.doc | DOC document | |
| MASTER Maintenance RFI Q and A FINAL 0004.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-3_Past_Performance_Data_Sheet V2.doc | DOC document | |
| HQ0034-11-R-0063-U03.pdf | ||
| MASTER Maintenance RFI Q and A FINAL.pdf | ||
| J-2 Pricing Submission Revised Amendment 0003.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sign in sheet.pdf | ||
| HQ0034-11-R-0063 MOD 0002.pdf | ||
| J-1 Equipment Inventory Revised Amendment 0002.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| J-2 Pricing Submission Revised Amendment 0002.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Amendment 1 Preventive Maintenance.doc | DOC document | |
| J-1 Equipment Inventory.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| J-3 Past Performance Data Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| HQ0034-11-R-0063.pdf | ||
| J-5 Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template.doc | DOC document | |
| J-2 Pricing Submission.doc | DOC document | |
| J-7 Davis Bacon Act Wage Determination.doc | DOC document | |
| J-6 Service Contract Act Wage Determination.doc | DOC document |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT J-4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Source Selection Sensitive
See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
TO:
FACSIMILE:
PHONE:
EMAIL:_________________________
Information Request
Washington Headquarters Services is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract for the provision of Pentagon Mechanical Systems Preventive Maintenance . [CONTRACTOR NAME] provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACT DESCRIPTION past performance under [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information in the following areas:
a.) Quality of Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors) In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information by 3:00 pm on 5 Aug 2011 to Janice T. Johnson at janice.johnson@whs.mil Information can also be sent via facsimile to the attention of Janice T.Johnson at FAX: (703) 697-6045.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD:
CONTRACT VALUE: $
1.
Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your firm.
2.
Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Outstanding (A), Very Good (B), Satisfactory (C), Poor (D), or Unacceptable (F). See next page for definition of ratings. For all ratings EXCEPT “Satisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| Outstanding |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Poor |
| Unacceptable |
OVERALL PAST PERFORMANCE RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the contractor’s past performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Service:
Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence.
b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries:
Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction
Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)
Quality of key personnel and how well key personnel managed their portion of the contract.
3.
Would you hire this contractor to provide services for your organization in the future? _____ Please provide comments using additional pages, if desired.
Signed:__________________________________
Print Name: ______________________________
PAST PERFORMANCE DEFINITIONS
The following definitions are to be used when assessing past performance:
OUTSTANDING/VERY LOW PERFORMANCE RISK (A)
No doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
VERY GOOD/LOW PERFORMANCE RISK (B)
Little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
SATISFACTORY/MODERATE PERFORMANCE RISK (C)
Some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
POOR/HIGH PERFORMANCE RISK (D)
Substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
UNACCEPTABLE/VERY HIGH PERFORMANCE RISK (F)
Extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
NEUTRAL (N)
The offeror, its subcontractors or team members and/or its key personnel have no significant performance record relevant or identifiable to the services to be performed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .