Copy_of_Attachment_05_Minimum_Standards_Tracking_and_Confirmation_Sheet_Cargo_1.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cargo Inspection Service
- Solicitation number
- HQ001318Q0007
- Issued by
-
Defense Security Cooperation Agency
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Eval Criteria
| Minimum Standard | Location in Submission | |
| Factor 1: Technical Capability | ||
| Sub Factor 1A Management/Performance Approach Plan and experience | a. Management/Performance Approach Plan. The minimum acceptability standard is a Management/Performance Approach document that addresses/schedules performance of each of the tasks that are listed in the PWS. – | |
| b. Contractor must have a minimum of three (3) years of experience in cargo inspection or similar service; | ||
| Inspector qualification and experience | a. have a High School Diploma or equivalent | |
| b. Possess Knowledge of the Denton Program and the Funded Transportation Program as outlined in the Humanitarian Assistance Transportation Program Guidelines. http://www.jag.navy.mil/distrib/instructions/ | ||
| c. The cargo inspector shall have – A minimum of three years total work experience similar to the requirement stated in the PWS. | ||
| d. Have the ability to get passport to conduct inspection Outside of the Continental United States (OCONUS). | ||
| Sub-Factor 1B – Understanding the Work | The proposal shall provide an overall methodology and organization structure that indicates a clear understanding of the work to be performed and the support required from the contractor organization; | |
| Subfactor 1 C. Quality Control Plan | The Quality Control Plan shall include the following: | |
| 1. Inspection System. At Paragraph 6.1.1 of the PWS. 2. Deficiency Prevention. At Paragraph 6.1.2 of the PWS. 3. Inspection Record. At Paragraph 6.1.3 of the PWS. | ||
| Fcator 2 Past Performance | The offeror’s present/past performance is recent, and relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. “Recent” is defined as a contract or subcontract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years. If the Offeror has not had Government contracts within the last three (3) years, information on recent commercial contracts and subcontracts may be submitted instead. The information must be clear as to whether the work by the Offeror was done as a prime contractor or a subcontractor. “Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation. Offerors who describe similar contracts and subcontracts should provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the similarity of the contracts to the requirements of this solicitation and PWS. |
Minimum Acceptability Standard Evaluaton Sheet
&P
File details come from the government source that posted it.